被隔离的重要性:铬评论的实证研究

2015 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI:10.1109/ESEM.2015.7321215

Subhajit Datta, Devarshi Bhatt, Manish Jain, Proshanta Sarkar, S. Sarkar

{"title":"被隔离的重要性:铬评论的实证研究","authors":"Subhajit Datta, Devarshi Bhatt, Manish Jain, Proshanta Sarkar, S. Sarkar","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2015.7321215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As large scale software development has become more collaborative, and software teams more globally distributed, several studies have explored how developer interaction influences software development outcomes. The emphasis so far has been largely on outcomes like defect count, the time to close modification requests etc. In the paper, we examine data from the Chromium project to understand how different aspects of developer discussion relate to the closure time of reviews. On the basis of analyzing reviews discussed by 2000+ developers, our results indicate that quicker closure of reviews owned by a developer relates to higher reception of information and insights from peers. However, we also find evidence that higher engagement in collaboration by a developer is associated with slower closure of the reviews she owns. Within the scope of our study, these results lead us to conclude that peer review of code may have a distinct dynamic that is facilitated by developers working in relative isolation.","PeriodicalId":258843,"journal":{"name":"2015 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)","volume":"66 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Importance of Being Isolated: An Empirical Study on Chromium Reviews\",\"authors\":\"Subhajit Datta, Devarshi Bhatt, Manish Jain, Proshanta Sarkar, S. Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESEM.2015.7321215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As large scale software development has become more collaborative, and software teams more globally distributed, several studies have explored how developer interaction influences software development outcomes. The emphasis so far has been largely on outcomes like defect count, the time to close modification requests etc. In the paper, we examine data from the Chromium project to understand how different aspects of developer discussion relate to the closure time of reviews. On the basis of analyzing reviews discussed by 2000+ developers, our results indicate that quicker closure of reviews owned by a developer relates to higher reception of information and insights from peers. However, we also find evidence that higher engagement in collaboration by a developer is associated with slower closure of the reviews she owns. Within the scope of our study, these results lead us to conclude that peer review of code may have a distinct dynamic that is facilitated by developers working in relative isolation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2015.7321215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2015.7321215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

随着大规模软件开发变得更加协作，软件团队更加全球分布，一些研究已经探索了开发人员交互如何影响软件开发结果。到目前为止，重点主要放在诸如缺陷计数、关闭修改请求的时间等结果上。在本文中，我们检查了Chromium项目的数据，以了解开发人员讨论的不同方面与审查结束时间的关系。在分析2000多个开发人员讨论的评审的基础上，我们的结果表明，开发人员拥有的评审的更快结束与来自同行的信息和见解的更高接收有关。然而，我们也发现有证据表明，开发人员在合作中的参与度越高，她所拥有的评论的关闭速度就越慢。在我们的研究范围内，这些结果使我们得出这样的结论:代码的同行评审可能具有一种不同的动态，这是由相对独立的开发人员促进的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Importance of Being Isolated: An Empirical Study on Chromium Reviews

As large scale software development has become more collaborative, and software teams more globally distributed, several studies have explored how developer interaction influences software development outcomes. The emphasis so far has been largely on outcomes like defect count, the time to close modification requests etc. In the paper, we examine data from the Chromium project to understand how different aspects of developer discussion relate to the closure time of reviews. On the basis of analyzing reviews discussed by 2000+ developers, our results indicate that quicker closure of reviews owned by a developer relates to higher reception of information and insights from peers. However, we also find evidence that higher engagement in collaboration by a developer is associated with slower closure of the reviews she owns. Within the scope of our study, these results lead us to conclude that peer review of code may have a distinct dynamic that is facilitated by developers working in relative isolation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2015 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)

自引率

0.00%

发文量