基于gpu的NSEC3散列打破

Matthäus Wander, Lorenz Schwittmann, Christopher Boelmann, Torben Weis
{"title":"基于gpu的NSEC3散列打破","authors":"Matthäus Wander, Lorenz Schwittmann, Christopher Boelmann, Torben Weis","doi":"10.1109/NCA.2014.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When a client queries for a non-existent name in the Domain Name System (DNS), the server responds with a negative answer. With the DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC), the server can either use NSEC or NSEC3 for authenticated negative answers. NSEC3 claims to protect DNSSEC servers against domain enumeration, but incurs significant CPU and bandwidth overhead. Thus, DNSSEC server admins must choose between more efficiency (NSEC) or privacy (NSEC3). We present a GPU-based attack on NSEC3 that revealed 64% of all DNSSEC names in the com domain in 4.5 days. This attack shows that the NSEC3 privacy promises are weak and thus DNSSEC server admins must carefully decide whether the limited privacy is worth the overhead. Furthermore, we show that an increase of the cryptographic strength of NSEC3 puts attackers at an advantage, since the cost of an attack does not rise faster than the costs incurred on the DNSSEC server.","PeriodicalId":399462,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications","volume":"35 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GPU-Based NSEC3 Hash Breaking\",\"authors\":\"Matthäus Wander, Lorenz Schwittmann, Christopher Boelmann, Torben Weis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NCA.2014.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When a client queries for a non-existent name in the Domain Name System (DNS), the server responds with a negative answer. With the DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC), the server can either use NSEC or NSEC3 for authenticated negative answers. NSEC3 claims to protect DNSSEC servers against domain enumeration, but incurs significant CPU and bandwidth overhead. Thus, DNSSEC server admins must choose between more efficiency (NSEC) or privacy (NSEC3). We present a GPU-based attack on NSEC3 that revealed 64% of all DNSSEC names in the com domain in 4.5 days. This attack shows that the NSEC3 privacy promises are weak and thus DNSSEC server admins must carefully decide whether the limited privacy is worth the overhead. Furthermore, we show that an increase of the cryptographic strength of NSEC3 puts attackers at an advantage, since the cost of an attack does not rise faster than the costs incurred on the DNSSEC server.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NCA.2014.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NCA.2014.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

当客户端查询域名系统(DNS)中不存在的名称时,服务器会以否定的答案响应。使用DNS安全扩展(DNSSEC),服务器可以使用NSEC或NSEC3来验证否定答案。NSEC3声称可以保护DNSSEC服务器不受域枚举的影响,但这会导致大量的CPU和带宽开销。因此,DNSSEC服务器管理员必须在提高效率(NSEC)或保护隐私(NSEC3)之间做出选择。我们提出了一种基于gpu的NSEC3攻击,在4.5天内泄露了com域中所有DNSSEC名称的64%。这种攻击表明NSEC3的隐私承诺很弱,因此DNSSEC服务器管理员必须仔细决定有限的隐私是否值得开销。此外,我们表明,NSEC3加密强度的增加使攻击者处于优势地位,因为攻击的成本不会比DNSSEC服务器上发生的成本上升得更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GPU-Based NSEC3 Hash Breaking
When a client queries for a non-existent name in the Domain Name System (DNS), the server responds with a negative answer. With the DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC), the server can either use NSEC or NSEC3 for authenticated negative answers. NSEC3 claims to protect DNSSEC servers against domain enumeration, but incurs significant CPU and bandwidth overhead. Thus, DNSSEC server admins must choose between more efficiency (NSEC) or privacy (NSEC3). We present a GPU-based attack on NSEC3 that revealed 64% of all DNSSEC names in the com domain in 4.5 days. This attack shows that the NSEC3 privacy promises are weak and thus DNSSEC server admins must carefully decide whether the limited privacy is worth the overhead. Furthermore, we show that an increase of the cryptographic strength of NSEC3 puts attackers at an advantage, since the cost of an attack does not rise faster than the costs incurred on the DNSSEC server.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信