国家合法性和就业部门

C. Hindermann
{"title":"国家合法性和就业部门","authors":"C. Hindermann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3187242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on Social Identity Theory (SIT), this paper analyzes whether state employees (in-group) have higher state legitimacy beliefs than employees working in the private sector (out-group). Using the fifth and the sixth waves of the World Values Survey and using a legitimacy measure that is based on Norris (1999), multi-level analyses provide evidence in favor of our hypothesis. State employees show significantly higher state legitimacy beliefs than employees working in the private sector. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is driven by social comparisons (SIT) or is simply a result of labor market selection mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":365899,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","volume":"16 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Legitimacy and Sector of Employment\",\"authors\":\"C. Hindermann\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3187242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on Social Identity Theory (SIT), this paper analyzes whether state employees (in-group) have higher state legitimacy beliefs than employees working in the private sector (out-group). Using the fifth and the sixth waves of the World Values Survey and using a legitimacy measure that is based on Norris (1999), multi-level analyses provide evidence in favor of our hypothesis. State employees show significantly higher state legitimacy beliefs than employees working in the private sector. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is driven by social comparisons (SIT) or is simply a result of labor market selection mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3187242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3187242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于社会认同理论(SIT),本文分析了国家雇员(内群体)是否比私营部门雇员(外群体)具有更高的国家合法性信念。利用世界价值观调查的第五和第六波,并使用基于诺里斯(1999)的合法性测量,多层次分析为我们的假设提供了支持的证据。国家雇员对国家合法性的信念明显高于私营部门雇员。然而,目前尚不清楚这种影响是由社会比较(SIT)驱动的,还是仅仅是劳动力市场选择机制的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State Legitimacy and Sector of Employment
Based on Social Identity Theory (SIT), this paper analyzes whether state employees (in-group) have higher state legitimacy beliefs than employees working in the private sector (out-group). Using the fifth and the sixth waves of the World Values Survey and using a legitimacy measure that is based on Norris (1999), multi-level analyses provide evidence in favor of our hypothesis. State employees show significantly higher state legitimacy beliefs than employees working in the private sector. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is driven by social comparisons (SIT) or is simply a result of labor market selection mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信