稀疏矩阵并行固定精度低秩逼近的精度与代价

Robert Ernstbrunner, Viktoria Mayer, W. Gansterer
{"title":"稀疏矩阵并行固定精度低秩逼近的精度与代价","authors":"Robert Ernstbrunner, Viktoria Mayer, W. Gansterer","doi":"10.1109/ipdps53621.2022.00051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study a randomized and a deterministic algorithm for the fixed-precision low-rank approximation problem of large sparse matrices. The Randomized QB Factorization (RandQB_EI) constructs a reduced and dense representation of the originally sparse matrix based on randomization. The representation resulting from the deterministic Truncated LU Factorization with Column and Row Tournament Pivoting (LU_CRTP) is sparse, but fill-in introduced in the factorization process can affect sparsity and performance. We therefore attempt to mitigate fill-in with an incomplete LU_CRTP variant with thresholding (ILUT_CRTP). We analyze this approach and identify potential problems that may arise in practice. We design parallel implementations of RandQB_EI, LU_CRTP and ILUT_CRTP. We experimentally evaluate strong scaling properties for different problems and the runtime required for achieving a given approximation quality. Our results show that LU_CRTP tends to be particularly competitive for low approximation quality. However, when a lot of fill-in occurs, LU_CRTP is outperformed by RandQB_EI especially for higher approximation quality. ILUT_CRTP outperforms both LU_CRTP and RandQB_EI and can achieve speedups up to 40 over LU_CRTP, depending on the amount of fill-in.","PeriodicalId":321801,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)","volume":"20 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy vs. Cost in Parallel Fixed-Precision Low-Rank Approximations of Sparse Matrices\",\"authors\":\"Robert Ernstbrunner, Viktoria Mayer, W. Gansterer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ipdps53621.2022.00051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study a randomized and a deterministic algorithm for the fixed-precision low-rank approximation problem of large sparse matrices. The Randomized QB Factorization (RandQB_EI) constructs a reduced and dense representation of the originally sparse matrix based on randomization. The representation resulting from the deterministic Truncated LU Factorization with Column and Row Tournament Pivoting (LU_CRTP) is sparse, but fill-in introduced in the factorization process can affect sparsity and performance. We therefore attempt to mitigate fill-in with an incomplete LU_CRTP variant with thresholding (ILUT_CRTP). We analyze this approach and identify potential problems that may arise in practice. We design parallel implementations of RandQB_EI, LU_CRTP and ILUT_CRTP. We experimentally evaluate strong scaling properties for different problems and the runtime required for achieving a given approximation quality. Our results show that LU_CRTP tends to be particularly competitive for low approximation quality. However, when a lot of fill-in occurs, LU_CRTP is outperformed by RandQB_EI especially for higher approximation quality. ILUT_CRTP outperforms both LU_CRTP and RandQB_EI and can achieve speedups up to 40 over LU_CRTP, depending on the amount of fill-in.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ipdps53621.2022.00051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ipdps53621.2022.00051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究了求解大稀疏矩阵定精度低秩逼近问题的一种随机和确定性算法。随机QB分解(RandQB_EI)是基于随机化构造原始稀疏矩阵的简化和密集表示。采用行列比武旋转的确定性截断LU分解(LU_CRTP)方法得到的表示是稀疏的,但在分解过程中引入的填充会影响稀疏性和性能。因此,我们尝试使用带有阈值的不完整LU_CRTP变体(ILUT_CRTP)来减轻填充。我们分析了这种方法,并确定了在实践中可能出现的潜在问题。我们设计了并行实现的RandQB_EI, LU_CRTP和ILUT_CRTP。我们通过实验评估了不同问题的强缩放特性以及实现给定近似质量所需的运行时间。我们的结果表明,LU_CRTP对于低近似质量具有特别的竞争力。然而,当大量填充发生时,LU_CRTP被RandQB_EI优于,特别是在更高的近似质量方面。ILUT_CRTP优于LU_CRTP和RandQB_EI,并且可以比LU_CRTP实现高达40的加速,这取决于填充的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy vs. Cost in Parallel Fixed-Precision Low-Rank Approximations of Sparse Matrices
We study a randomized and a deterministic algorithm for the fixed-precision low-rank approximation problem of large sparse matrices. The Randomized QB Factorization (RandQB_EI) constructs a reduced and dense representation of the originally sparse matrix based on randomization. The representation resulting from the deterministic Truncated LU Factorization with Column and Row Tournament Pivoting (LU_CRTP) is sparse, but fill-in introduced in the factorization process can affect sparsity and performance. We therefore attempt to mitigate fill-in with an incomplete LU_CRTP variant with thresholding (ILUT_CRTP). We analyze this approach and identify potential problems that may arise in practice. We design parallel implementations of RandQB_EI, LU_CRTP and ILUT_CRTP. We experimentally evaluate strong scaling properties for different problems and the runtime required for achieving a given approximation quality. Our results show that LU_CRTP tends to be particularly competitive for low approximation quality. However, when a lot of fill-in occurs, LU_CRTP is outperformed by RandQB_EI especially for higher approximation quality. ILUT_CRTP outperforms both LU_CRTP and RandQB_EI and can achieve speedups up to 40 over LU_CRTP, depending on the amount of fill-in.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信