超标量处理器分支预测方案的比较[j]

A. A. Youssif, N. A. Ismail, F. Torkey
{"title":"超标量处理器分支预测方案的比较[j]","authors":"A. A. Youssif, N. A. Ismail, F. Torkey","doi":"10.1109/ICEEC.2004.1374437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instruction-level parallelism (ILP) in superscalar architectures makes use of deep pipelines in order to execute multiple instructions per cycle. The fvequency and behavior of branch instructions seriously affect performance of ILP processors. Various mechanisms, both at the compiler, as well as the processor level, have been proposed to predict the branch behavior. In this work, we have investigated various branch predictors at processor level to do a fair comparison among them. A practical implementation is described using several SPECintOO and SPECfpOO benchmarks and similar key parameters for evaluating these predictors. The branch-prediction schemes chosen for these comparisons are statically tokenhot-taken, bimodal, Combination, correlation, twolevel adaptive, hybrid, and gshare branch predictors. The results show that predictors which do not use global history registers, or which hash the global history register with the branch address or other values will bene$t fvom the predictor table interference reduction and increasing the table lengths. Two-level, gshare, and hybrid are the most promising predictor schemes available.","PeriodicalId":180043,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 2004. ICEEC '04.","volume":"18 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of branch prediction schemes for superscalar processors ICEEC 2004\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Youssif, N. A. Ismail, F. Torkey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEEC.2004.1374437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Instruction-level parallelism (ILP) in superscalar architectures makes use of deep pipelines in order to execute multiple instructions per cycle. The fvequency and behavior of branch instructions seriously affect performance of ILP processors. Various mechanisms, both at the compiler, as well as the processor level, have been proposed to predict the branch behavior. In this work, we have investigated various branch predictors at processor level to do a fair comparison among them. A practical implementation is described using several SPECintOO and SPECfpOO benchmarks and similar key parameters for evaluating these predictors. The branch-prediction schemes chosen for these comparisons are statically tokenhot-taken, bimodal, Combination, correlation, twolevel adaptive, hybrid, and gshare branch predictors. The results show that predictors which do not use global history registers, or which hash the global history register with the branch address or other values will bene$t fvom the predictor table interference reduction and increasing the table lengths. Two-level, gshare, and hybrid are the most promising predictor schemes available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 2004. ICEEC '04.\",\"volume\":\"18 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 2004. ICEEC '04.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEC.2004.1374437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 2004. ICEEC '04.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEC.2004.1374437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

超标量体系结构中的指令级并行(ILP)利用深度管道在每个周期内执行多条指令。分支指令的频率和行为严重影响着ILP处理器的性能。在编译器和处理器级别,已经提出了各种机制来预测分支行为。在这项工作中,我们研究了处理器级别的各种分支预测器,以便在它们之间进行公平的比较。使用几个SPECintOO和SPECfpOO基准测试和用于评估这些预测器的类似关键参数描述了一个实际实现。为这些比较选择的分支预测方案是静态标记热取、双峰、组合、相关、两级自适应、混合和gshare分支预测器。结果表明,不使用全局历史寄存器或使用分支地址或其他值对全局历史寄存器进行散列的预测器将从减少预测表干扰和增加表长度中获益$t。两级、gshare和hybrid是目前最有前途的预测方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of branch prediction schemes for superscalar processors ICEEC 2004
Instruction-level parallelism (ILP) in superscalar architectures makes use of deep pipelines in order to execute multiple instructions per cycle. The fvequency and behavior of branch instructions seriously affect performance of ILP processors. Various mechanisms, both at the compiler, as well as the processor level, have been proposed to predict the branch behavior. In this work, we have investigated various branch predictors at processor level to do a fair comparison among them. A practical implementation is described using several SPECintOO and SPECfpOO benchmarks and similar key parameters for evaluating these predictors. The branch-prediction schemes chosen for these comparisons are statically tokenhot-taken, bimodal, Combination, correlation, twolevel adaptive, hybrid, and gshare branch predictors. The results show that predictors which do not use global history registers, or which hash the global history register with the branch address or other values will bene$t fvom the predictor table interference reduction and increasing the table lengths. Two-level, gshare, and hybrid are the most promising predictor schemes available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信