工作文件20:腐败与人权

Anne Peters
{"title":"工作文件20:腐败与人权","authors":"Anne Peters","doi":"10.12685/bigwp.2015.20.1-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a fact that states with a high corruption rate (or a high corruption perception) are at the same time those with a bad human rights situation. Beyond this coincidence, the paper seeks to identify a concrete legal relationship between corruption and deficient human rights protection. This seems relevant and practical terms, because the extant international norms against corruption have so far yielded only modest success; their implementation could be improved with the help of human rights arguments and instruments. \nThis paper therefore discusses a dual question: \n \nCan corrupt behaviour be conceptualised as a human rights violation? \nShould corrupt behaviour be categorised and sanctioned as a human rights violation? \n \nThe author's answer is that such a juridic reconstruction is plausible under specific conditions, especially for petty corruption, but that we should be aware of the risks of such reframing of the issue.","PeriodicalId":447485,"journal":{"name":"Basel Institute on Governance Working Papers","volume":"246 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working Paper 20: Corruption and human rights\",\"authors\":\"Anne Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.12685/bigwp.2015.20.1-34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is a fact that states with a high corruption rate (or a high corruption perception) are at the same time those with a bad human rights situation. Beyond this coincidence, the paper seeks to identify a concrete legal relationship between corruption and deficient human rights protection. This seems relevant and practical terms, because the extant international norms against corruption have so far yielded only modest success; their implementation could be improved with the help of human rights arguments and instruments. \\nThis paper therefore discusses a dual question: \\n \\nCan corrupt behaviour be conceptualised as a human rights violation? \\nShould corrupt behaviour be categorised and sanctioned as a human rights violation? \\n \\nThe author's answer is that such a juridic reconstruction is plausible under specific conditions, especially for petty corruption, but that we should be aware of the risks of such reframing of the issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basel Institute on Governance Working Papers\",\"volume\":\"246 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basel Institute on Governance Working Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12685/bigwp.2015.20.1-34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basel Institute on Governance Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12685/bigwp.2015.20.1-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

事实上,腐败率高(或腐败观念高)的国家同时也是人权状况较差的国家。除了这种巧合之外,本文还试图找出腐败与缺乏人权保护之间的具体法律关系。这似乎是相关和实际的条件,因为现有的反腐败国际准则迄今只取得了有限的成功;在人权论点和文书的帮助下,它们的执行可以得到改善。因此,本文讨论了一个双重问题:腐败行为能否被概念化为侵犯人权?腐败行为是否应该被归类为侵犯人权的行为并受到制裁?作者的回答是,这种司法重构在特定条件下是合理的,特别是对于轻微的腐败,但我们应该意识到这种重构问题的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working Paper 20: Corruption and human rights
It is a fact that states with a high corruption rate (or a high corruption perception) are at the same time those with a bad human rights situation. Beyond this coincidence, the paper seeks to identify a concrete legal relationship between corruption and deficient human rights protection. This seems relevant and practical terms, because the extant international norms against corruption have so far yielded only modest success; their implementation could be improved with the help of human rights arguments and instruments. This paper therefore discusses a dual question: Can corrupt behaviour be conceptualised as a human rights violation? Should corrupt behaviour be categorised and sanctioned as a human rights violation? The author's answer is that such a juridic reconstruction is plausible under specific conditions, especially for petty corruption, but that we should be aware of the risks of such reframing of the issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信