在公司法和金融法的背景下,英国的大流行应对——法律之内和法律之外

Iain Macneil, Irene-Marié Esser
{"title":"在公司法和金融法的背景下,英国的大流行应对——法律之内和法律之外","authors":"Iain Macneil, Irene-Marié Esser","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3636292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This short paper focuses on the response to the pandemic in corporate law and capital markets regulation and the role that the law played in it.\r\n\r\nFirst, the pandemic has brought the interests of stakeholders into more direct focus in corporate governance than was previously the case. But questions remain as to whether this represents only a temporary adjustment in response to the crisis or, alternatively, a more enduring trend. And if the latter, it prompts consideration of the appropriate techniques for stakeholder engagement and participation in corporate governance.\r\n\r\nSecond, the pandemic has disrupted the relationship between financial firms and their customers and the operation of capital markets. Conduct regulators have responded with a series of interventions. We examine whether those interventions are ad hoc or, alternatively, if they can be linked to key regulatory trends that emerged in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis. This approach provides a basis for assessing the implications of the pandemic for the future trajectory of conduct regulation. \r\n\r\nConclusions are then drawn on the way forward and the likely role that the law will play.","PeriodicalId":354906,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal","volume":"9 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pandemic Response in the UK in the Context of Corporate and Financial Law – within and without Law\",\"authors\":\"Iain Macneil, Irene-Marié Esser\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3636292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This short paper focuses on the response to the pandemic in corporate law and capital markets regulation and the role that the law played in it.\\r\\n\\r\\nFirst, the pandemic has brought the interests of stakeholders into more direct focus in corporate governance than was previously the case. But questions remain as to whether this represents only a temporary adjustment in response to the crisis or, alternatively, a more enduring trend. And if the latter, it prompts consideration of the appropriate techniques for stakeholder engagement and participation in corporate governance.\\r\\n\\r\\nSecond, the pandemic has disrupted the relationship between financial firms and their customers and the operation of capital markets. Conduct regulators have responded with a series of interventions. We examine whether those interventions are ad hoc or, alternatively, if they can be linked to key regulatory trends that emerged in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis. This approach provides a basis for assessing the implications of the pandemic for the future trajectory of conduct regulation. \\r\\n\\r\\nConclusions are then drawn on the way forward and the likely role that the law will play.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3636292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3636292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇短文的重点是公司法和资本市场监管对大流行的反应以及法律在其中发挥的作用。首先,与以前相比,大流行使利益攸关方的利益更直接地成为公司治理的焦点。但问题在于,这是否只是应对危机的暂时调整,还是一种更持久的趋势?如果是后者,则促使考虑利益相关者参与和参与公司治理的适当技术。第二,疫情扰乱了金融企业与客户的关系,扰乱了资本市场的运行。行为监管机构采取了一系列干预措施。我们将研究这些干预措施是临时性的,还是可以与2008年全球金融危机后出现的关键监管趋势联系起来。这种方法为评估大流行对未来行为监管轨迹的影响提供了基础。然后就未来的道路和法律可能发挥的作用得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Pandemic Response in the UK in the Context of Corporate and Financial Law – within and without Law
This short paper focuses on the response to the pandemic in corporate law and capital markets regulation and the role that the law played in it. First, the pandemic has brought the interests of stakeholders into more direct focus in corporate governance than was previously the case. But questions remain as to whether this represents only a temporary adjustment in response to the crisis or, alternatively, a more enduring trend. And if the latter, it prompts consideration of the appropriate techniques for stakeholder engagement and participation in corporate governance. Second, the pandemic has disrupted the relationship between financial firms and their customers and the operation of capital markets. Conduct regulators have responded with a series of interventions. We examine whether those interventions are ad hoc or, alternatively, if they can be linked to key regulatory trends that emerged in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis. This approach provides a basis for assessing the implications of the pandemic for the future trajectory of conduct regulation. Conclusions are then drawn on the way forward and the likely role that the law will play.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信