Stephen M. Simi, Joe Uidenich, S. Mulholland, J. Head
{"title":"基于模型的工具设计的FACE™技术标准,版本3.0和2.1","authors":"Stephen M. Simi, Joe Uidenich, S. Mulholland, J. Head","doi":"10.1109/AERO47225.2020.9172601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The promise of model-based systems engineering (MBSE), as described by DO-178C's supplement, DO-330 [1], [2] is with a sufficiently described system and software model, one should be able to auto-generate system's control software, testing, and lifecycle documentation. If aligned to a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA), like the Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE) Technical Standard [3], and if aligned to Military Aircraft Airworthiness Qualification efforts, the lifecycle artifacts can be used and reused across a fleet of dissimilar aircraft systems, enhancing aircraft capabilities across the battlespace [4]. The Open Group FACE Consortium [https://www.opengroup.org/face] has long requested metrics regarding time savings and level of effort (LOE) using the Modular Open Systems Approach described by the FACE Approach. This paper presents three (3) working use cases of using the TES-SAVi AWESUM® MBSE tool suite converting FACE Technical Standard data models. AWESUM® now has the capability to convert software developed to the FACE Technical Standard from Standard, Editions 2.x to 3, up to the interface validation process. Designed as a complete lifecycle tools suite, AWESUM® has the ability to address the complete lifecycle objectives described by DO-178C, support software aligned to the FACE Technical Standard, and support Military Airworthiness Qualification processes [5]. The use cases reported within this paper include the conversion of the BALSA (Basic Avionics Lightweight Source Archetype) User Supplied Model (USM) v2 with ~100 data elements to USM v3; secondly, the v2 to v3 conversion of a US Army Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) topic requesting common reusable FACE development efforts, namely the Army Common Engine FADEC Interface (CEFI) FACE component, which was intentionally designed to leverage BALSA as its starting point for design; and thirdly a sizable real-world application, the conversion of a Raytheon Missile Systems' (RMS) program with ~15,000 data elements. This third product is a FACE Domain Specific Data Model (DSDM) awarded FACE Conformance Certification in April 2019 to FACE Technical Standard, Edition 2.1. This DSDM is based on the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Control Segment (UCS) Version 3.4 [6]. This paper records the efficiencies of MBSE tools applied to FACE Technical Standard development efforts, lessons learned, and metrics on level of effort (LOE) saved. Should the products be ported and reused across a fleet of dissimilar aircraft platforms, the reuse efficiencies further increase.","PeriodicalId":114560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference","volume":"41 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-based Tools designed for the FACE™ Technical Standard, Editions 3.0 & 2.1\",\"authors\":\"Stephen M. Simi, Joe Uidenich, S. Mulholland, J. Head\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AERO47225.2020.9172601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The promise of model-based systems engineering (MBSE), as described by DO-178C's supplement, DO-330 [1], [2] is with a sufficiently described system and software model, one should be able to auto-generate system's control software, testing, and lifecycle documentation. If aligned to a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA), like the Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE) Technical Standard [3], and if aligned to Military Aircraft Airworthiness Qualification efforts, the lifecycle artifacts can be used and reused across a fleet of dissimilar aircraft systems, enhancing aircraft capabilities across the battlespace [4]. The Open Group FACE Consortium [https://www.opengroup.org/face] has long requested metrics regarding time savings and level of effort (LOE) using the Modular Open Systems Approach described by the FACE Approach. This paper presents three (3) working use cases of using the TES-SAVi AWESUM® MBSE tool suite converting FACE Technical Standard data models. AWESUM® now has the capability to convert software developed to the FACE Technical Standard from Standard, Editions 2.x to 3, up to the interface validation process. Designed as a complete lifecycle tools suite, AWESUM® has the ability to address the complete lifecycle objectives described by DO-178C, support software aligned to the FACE Technical Standard, and support Military Airworthiness Qualification processes [5]. The use cases reported within this paper include the conversion of the BALSA (Basic Avionics Lightweight Source Archetype) User Supplied Model (USM) v2 with ~100 data elements to USM v3; secondly, the v2 to v3 conversion of a US Army Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) topic requesting common reusable FACE development efforts, namely the Army Common Engine FADEC Interface (CEFI) FACE component, which was intentionally designed to leverage BALSA as its starting point for design; and thirdly a sizable real-world application, the conversion of a Raytheon Missile Systems' (RMS) program with ~15,000 data elements. This third product is a FACE Domain Specific Data Model (DSDM) awarded FACE Conformance Certification in April 2019 to FACE Technical Standard, Edition 2.1. This DSDM is based on the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Control Segment (UCS) Version 3.4 [6]. This paper records the efficiencies of MBSE tools applied to FACE Technical Standard development efforts, lessons learned, and metrics on level of effort (LOE) saved. Should the products be ported and reused across a fleet of dissimilar aircraft platforms, the reuse efficiencies further increase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference\",\"volume\":\"41 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO47225.2020.9172601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO47225.2020.9172601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于模型的系统工程(MBSE)的承诺,正如DO-178C的补充,DO-330[1],[2]所描述的那样,是一个充分描述的系统和软件模型,一个人应该能够自动生成系统的控制软件,测试,和生命周期文档。如果与模块化开放系统方法(MOSA)相一致,如未来机载能力环境(FACE)技术标准[3],如果与军用飞机适航资格认证工作相一致,则生命周期工件可以在不同飞机系统的机队中使用和重用,从而增强整个战场空间的飞机能力[4]。Open Group FACE Consortium [https://www.opengroup.org/face]长期以来一直要求使用FACE方法所描述的模块化开放系统方法来节省时间和工作水平(LOE)。本文介绍了使用es - savi AWESUM®MBSE工具套件转换FACE技术标准数据模型的三(3)个工作用例。AWESUM®现在有能力将开发的软件从第2版标准转换为FACE技术标准。X到3,直到接口验证过程。作为一个完整的生命周期工具套件,AWESUM®能够满足DO-178C所描述的完整生命周期目标,支持与FACE技术标准一致的软件,并支持军用适航资格认证流程[5]。本文中报告的用例包括将具有约100个数据元素的BALSA(基本航空电子轻量级源原型)用户提供模型(USM) v2转换为USM v3;其次,美国陆军小企业创新研究(SBIR)主题的v2到v3转换,要求共同的可重用FACE开发工作,即陆军通用引擎FADEC接口(CEFI) FACE组件,该组件被有意设计为利用BALSA作为其设计起点;第三是一个相当大的实际应用,转换雷声导弹系统(RMS)程序,大约有15,000个数据元素。第三个产品是FACE领域特定数据模型(DSDM),于2019年4月获得FACE技术标准2.1版的FACE一致性认证。该DSDM基于无人机系统(UAS)控制段(UCS) 3.4版本[6]。本文记录了应用于FACE技术标准开发工作的MBSE工具的效率、获得的经验教训,以及节省的工作水平(LOE)的度量。如果在不同的飞机平台上移植和重用这些产品,那么重用效率将进一步提高。
Model-based Tools designed for the FACE™ Technical Standard, Editions 3.0 & 2.1
The promise of model-based systems engineering (MBSE), as described by DO-178C's supplement, DO-330 [1], [2] is with a sufficiently described system and software model, one should be able to auto-generate system's control software, testing, and lifecycle documentation. If aligned to a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA), like the Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE) Technical Standard [3], and if aligned to Military Aircraft Airworthiness Qualification efforts, the lifecycle artifacts can be used and reused across a fleet of dissimilar aircraft systems, enhancing aircraft capabilities across the battlespace [4]. The Open Group FACE Consortium [https://www.opengroup.org/face] has long requested metrics regarding time savings and level of effort (LOE) using the Modular Open Systems Approach described by the FACE Approach. This paper presents three (3) working use cases of using the TES-SAVi AWESUM® MBSE tool suite converting FACE Technical Standard data models. AWESUM® now has the capability to convert software developed to the FACE Technical Standard from Standard, Editions 2.x to 3, up to the interface validation process. Designed as a complete lifecycle tools suite, AWESUM® has the ability to address the complete lifecycle objectives described by DO-178C, support software aligned to the FACE Technical Standard, and support Military Airworthiness Qualification processes [5]. The use cases reported within this paper include the conversion of the BALSA (Basic Avionics Lightweight Source Archetype) User Supplied Model (USM) v2 with ~100 data elements to USM v3; secondly, the v2 to v3 conversion of a US Army Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) topic requesting common reusable FACE development efforts, namely the Army Common Engine FADEC Interface (CEFI) FACE component, which was intentionally designed to leverage BALSA as its starting point for design; and thirdly a sizable real-world application, the conversion of a Raytheon Missile Systems' (RMS) program with ~15,000 data elements. This third product is a FACE Domain Specific Data Model (DSDM) awarded FACE Conformance Certification in April 2019 to FACE Technical Standard, Edition 2.1. This DSDM is based on the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Control Segment (UCS) Version 3.4 [6]. This paper records the efficiencies of MBSE tools applied to FACE Technical Standard development efforts, lessons learned, and metrics on level of effort (LOE) saved. Should the products be ported and reused across a fleet of dissimilar aircraft platforms, the reuse efficiencies further increase.