{"title":"普通法双重危险原则的历史:从古典到现代","authors":"G. Coffey","doi":"10.30958/ajl.8-3-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The double jeopardy principle is a guarantee of individual liberty that has ancient origins. The development of the principle has been incremental, and its meaning has varied through the ages. The research question and attending analyses presented in this article advances an examination of the evolution of the double jeopardy principle in historical context. Through doctrinal analysis the hypothesis advances the supposition that the common law principle was firmly established by the post-medieval period. Through an examination of landmarks in the development of the principle the article examines theoretical underpinnings and considers the extent to which the criminal justice system developed a public prosecution model of criminal justice. The incremental development of this fundamental principle of criminal justice can be explained in terms of the deficiencies in medieval criminal procedure, prejudices and practices of medieval trial procedure and punishments imposed on convicted offenders. Jurisprudence on the application of the principle indicates significant developments following the Restoration. Keywords: Double jeopardy; Ne bis in idem; Autrefois acquit; Autrefois convict; Criminous clerks; Restoration","PeriodicalId":184533,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","volume":"402 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A History of the Common Law Double Jeopardy Principle: From Classical Antiquity to Modern Era\",\"authors\":\"G. Coffey\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/ajl.8-3-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The double jeopardy principle is a guarantee of individual liberty that has ancient origins. The development of the principle has been incremental, and its meaning has varied through the ages. The research question and attending analyses presented in this article advances an examination of the evolution of the double jeopardy principle in historical context. Through doctrinal analysis the hypothesis advances the supposition that the common law principle was firmly established by the post-medieval period. Through an examination of landmarks in the development of the principle the article examines theoretical underpinnings and considers the extent to which the criminal justice system developed a public prosecution model of criminal justice. The incremental development of this fundamental principle of criminal justice can be explained in terms of the deficiencies in medieval criminal procedure, prejudices and practices of medieval trial procedure and punishments imposed on convicted offenders. Jurisprudence on the application of the principle indicates significant developments following the Restoration. Keywords: Double jeopardy; Ne bis in idem; Autrefois acquit; Autrefois convict; Criminous clerks; Restoration\",\"PeriodicalId\":184533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"volume\":\"402 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.8-3-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.8-3-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
双重危险原则是一种对个人自由的保障,它有着古老的起源。这一原则的发展是渐进的,其含义也随着时代的变化而变化。本文提出的研究问题和相关分析,对双重危险原则在历史背景下的演变进行了考察。通过理论分析,该假设提出了英美法系原则在后中世纪时期牢固确立的假设。通过对该原则发展的里程碑的考察,本文考察了理论基础,并考虑了刑事司法系统发展刑事司法公诉模式的程度。这一刑事司法基本原则的逐步发展可以从中世纪刑事诉讼程序的缺陷、中世纪审判程序的偏见和做法以及对被定罪罪犯的惩罚来解释。关于该原则适用的法理学表明了在复辟之后的重大发展。关键词:双重诉讼;Ne bis in idem;过去即使无罪释放;过去即使定罪;犯了罪的职员;恢复
A History of the Common Law Double Jeopardy Principle: From Classical Antiquity to Modern Era
The double jeopardy principle is a guarantee of individual liberty that has ancient origins. The development of the principle has been incremental, and its meaning has varied through the ages. The research question and attending analyses presented in this article advances an examination of the evolution of the double jeopardy principle in historical context. Through doctrinal analysis the hypothesis advances the supposition that the common law principle was firmly established by the post-medieval period. Through an examination of landmarks in the development of the principle the article examines theoretical underpinnings and considers the extent to which the criminal justice system developed a public prosecution model of criminal justice. The incremental development of this fundamental principle of criminal justice can be explained in terms of the deficiencies in medieval criminal procedure, prejudices and practices of medieval trial procedure and punishments imposed on convicted offenders. Jurisprudence on the application of the principle indicates significant developments following the Restoration. Keywords: Double jeopardy; Ne bis in idem; Autrefois acquit; Autrefois convict; Criminous clerks; Restoration