家庭暴力受害者应对、家庭问题解决与情绪状况的比较研究

C. Clements, Richard L. Ogle
{"title":"家庭暴力受害者应对、家庭问题解决与情绪状况的比较研究","authors":"C. Clements, Richard L. Ogle","doi":"10.1300/J513v06n01_03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Domestic violence research has been limited by lack of appropriate comparison groups. In the present study, shelter-living, abused women were compared to community-living, abused women, maritally distressed women, and non-distressed non-abused women on relationship characteristics, emotional status, and family problem solving and coping. Shelter-living abused women reported more physical violence in the past year than community-living abused women. Both abused groups reported higher levels of depression and anxiety than non-abused groups. Community-living women reported greater use of aggressive solutions to family problems than other groups. Differences between community-living and shelter-living abused women point to the utility of including appropriate comparison groups in studies of abused women.","PeriodicalId":360233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychological Trauma","volume":"43 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison Study of Coping, Family Problem-Solving and Emotional Status in Victims of Domestic Violence\",\"authors\":\"C. Clements, Richard L. Ogle\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J513v06n01_03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Domestic violence research has been limited by lack of appropriate comparison groups. In the present study, shelter-living, abused women were compared to community-living, abused women, maritally distressed women, and non-distressed non-abused women on relationship characteristics, emotional status, and family problem solving and coping. Shelter-living abused women reported more physical violence in the past year than community-living abused women. Both abused groups reported higher levels of depression and anxiety than non-abused groups. Community-living women reported greater use of aggressive solutions to family problems than other groups. Differences between community-living and shelter-living abused women point to the utility of including appropriate comparison groups in studies of abused women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychological Trauma\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychological Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J513v06n01_03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychological Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J513v06n01_03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

家庭暴力研究一直受到缺乏合适的比较群体的限制。本研究比较了收容型受虐妇女与社区型受虐妇女、婚姻痛苦妇女和非婚姻痛苦、非受虐妇女在人际关系特征、情感状态、家庭问题解决与应对等方面的差异。据报告,在过去一年中,生活在庇护所的受虐待妇女比生活在社区的受虐待妇女遭受更多的身体暴力。两组受虐者的抑郁和焦虑程度都高于未受虐者。据报告,社区生活的妇女比其他群体更多地使用激进的解决办法来解决家庭问题。受虐待妇女在社区生活和在庇护所生活之间的差异表明,在受虐待妇女的研究中纳入适当的比较组是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison Study of Coping, Family Problem-Solving and Emotional Status in Victims of Domestic Violence
ABSTRACT Domestic violence research has been limited by lack of appropriate comparison groups. In the present study, shelter-living, abused women were compared to community-living, abused women, maritally distressed women, and non-distressed non-abused women on relationship characteristics, emotional status, and family problem solving and coping. Shelter-living abused women reported more physical violence in the past year than community-living abused women. Both abused groups reported higher levels of depression and anxiety than non-abused groups. Community-living women reported greater use of aggressive solutions to family problems than other groups. Differences between community-living and shelter-living abused women point to the utility of including appropriate comparison groups in studies of abused women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信