到达和就位

Charles R. Cobb
{"title":"到达和就位","authors":"Charles R. Cobb","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvx072qg.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter outlines how emplacement was an important complement to displacement as a Native American adaption to continuing incursions of colonial powers. As with displacement, several key strategies of emplacement, or socially producing place, are explored. These include coalescence and colonization. As the late 1600s and 1700s progressed, the ongoing patterns of displacement and emplacement lent the southeastern landscape an increasingly fractal quality. Towns themselves may have incorporated distinct enclaves of newcomers, while nominal culture regions could contain discrete settlements of migrants forced out of shatter zones. By the mid- to late 1700s, the Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, Seminoles, Catawbas, Creeks, and other surviving Native American communities of the Southeast were all multidimensional coalescent entities. In addition, the Franciscan mission system in the Spanish colony of La Florida is presented as a distinct trajectory of emplacement in the Southeast.","PeriodicalId":127129,"journal":{"name":"The Archaeology of Southeastern Native American Landscapes of the Colonial Era","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arrival and Emplacement\",\"authors\":\"Charles R. Cobb\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvx072qg.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter outlines how emplacement was an important complement to displacement as a Native American adaption to continuing incursions of colonial powers. As with displacement, several key strategies of emplacement, or socially producing place, are explored. These include coalescence and colonization. As the late 1600s and 1700s progressed, the ongoing patterns of displacement and emplacement lent the southeastern landscape an increasingly fractal quality. Towns themselves may have incorporated distinct enclaves of newcomers, while nominal culture regions could contain discrete settlements of migrants forced out of shatter zones. By the mid- to late 1700s, the Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, Seminoles, Catawbas, Creeks, and other surviving Native American communities of the Southeast were all multidimensional coalescent entities. In addition, the Franciscan mission system in the Spanish colony of La Florida is presented as a distinct trajectory of emplacement in the Southeast.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Archaeology of Southeastern Native American Landscapes of the Colonial Era\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Archaeology of Southeastern Native American Landscapes of the Colonial Era\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx072qg.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Archaeology of Southeastern Native American Landscapes of the Colonial Era","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx072qg.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章概述了安置是如何成为印第安人适应殖民列强持续入侵的重要补充。与流离失所一样,本文探讨了安置或社会生产场所的几个关键策略。这包括合并和定植。随着17世纪末和18世纪的发展,不断发生的迁移和安置模式使东南部的景观具有越来越多的分形特征。城镇本身可能包含了不同的新移民聚居地,而名义上的文化区可能包含了被迫离开破碎地区的移民的离散定居点。到18世纪中后期,切罗基人、克里克人、乔克托人、契卡索人、塞米诺尔人、卡托巴人、克里克人,以及东南部其他幸存的美洲原住民社区都是多维度融合的实体。此外,方济各会传教系统在西班牙殖民地拉佛罗里达呈现为一个独特的轨迹,在东南安置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arrival and Emplacement
This chapter outlines how emplacement was an important complement to displacement as a Native American adaption to continuing incursions of colonial powers. As with displacement, several key strategies of emplacement, or socially producing place, are explored. These include coalescence and colonization. As the late 1600s and 1700s progressed, the ongoing patterns of displacement and emplacement lent the southeastern landscape an increasingly fractal quality. Towns themselves may have incorporated distinct enclaves of newcomers, while nominal culture regions could contain discrete settlements of migrants forced out of shatter zones. By the mid- to late 1700s, the Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, Seminoles, Catawbas, Creeks, and other surviving Native American communities of the Southeast were all multidimensional coalescent entities. In addition, the Franciscan mission system in the Spanish colony of La Florida is presented as a distinct trajectory of emplacement in the Southeast.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信