话语层面意见关系:一个注释研究

SIGDIAL Workshop Pub Date : 2008-06-19 DOI:10.3115/1622064.1622092

Swapna Somasundaran, Josef Ruppenhofer, J. Wiebe

{"title":"话语层面意见关系:一个注释研究","authors":"Swapna Somasundaran, Josef Ruppenhofer, J. Wiebe","doi":"10.3115/1622064.1622092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work proposes opinion frames as a representation of discourse-level associations that arise from related opinion targets and which are common in task-oriented meeting dialogs. We define the opinion frames and explain their interpretation. Additionally we present an annotation scheme that realizes the opinion frames and via human annotation studies, we show that these can be reliably identified.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"23 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discourse Level Opinion Relations: An Annotation Study\",\"authors\":\"Swapna Somasundaran, Josef Ruppenhofer, J. Wiebe\",\"doi\":\"10.3115/1622064.1622092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work proposes opinion frames as a representation of discourse-level associations that arise from related opinion targets and which are common in task-oriented meeting dialogs. We define the opinion frames and explain their interpretation. Additionally we present an annotation scheme that realizes the opinion frames and via human annotation studies, we show that these can be reliably identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3115/1622064.1622092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1622064.1622092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 46

摘要

这项工作提出了意见框架作为话语层面关联的代表，这些关联来自相关的意见目标，在任务导向的会议对话中很常见。我们定义意见框架并解释其解释。此外，我们提出了一种实现意见框架的注释方案，并通过人类注释研究，我们表明这些意见框架可以可靠地识别。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Discourse Level Opinion Relations: An Annotation Study

This work proposes opinion frames as a representation of discourse-level associations that arise from related opinion targets and which are common in task-oriented meeting dialogs. We define the opinion frames and explain their interpretation. Additionally we present an annotation scheme that realizes the opinion frames and via human annotation studies, we show that these can be reliably identified.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

SIGDIAL Workshop

自引率

0.00%

发文量