弥合“规范差距”:机制设计与社会正义

PSN: Justice (Topic) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3242882

Zoë Hitzig

{"title":"弥合“规范差距”:机制设计与社会正义","authors":"Zoë Hitzig","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3242882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I draw on contemporary debates in political philosophy to understand the limits and hazards of using mechanism design to offer technical solutions to problems in which technical and social issues are intertwined. Using Boston’s experience with K-12 school choice reform over the last half century as a case study, I argue that mechanism design introduces what I call a \"normative gap\" between the goals pursued by economic designers and those pursued by policymakers.","PeriodicalId":138110,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Justice (Topic)","volume":"27 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the 'Normative Gap': Mechanism Design and Social Justice\",\"authors\":\"Zoë Hitzig\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3242882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I draw on contemporary debates in political philosophy to understand the limits and hazards of using mechanism design to offer technical solutions to problems in which technical and social issues are intertwined. Using Boston’s experience with K-12 school choice reform over the last half century as a case study, I argue that mechanism design introduces what I call a \\\"normative gap\\\" between the goals pursued by economic designers and those pursued by policymakers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Justice (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Justice (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3242882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Justice (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3242882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

我利用当代政治哲学的辩论来理解使用机制设计为技术和社会问题交织在一起的问题提供技术解决方案的局限性和危害。以波士顿过去半个世纪的K-12学校选择改革经验为例，我认为，机制设计在经济设计师追求的目标和政策制定者追求的目标之间引入了我所谓的“规范差距”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Bridging the 'Normative Gap': Mechanism Design and Social Justice

I draw on contemporary debates in political philosophy to understand the limits and hazards of using mechanism design to offer technical solutions to problems in which technical and social issues are intertwined. Using Boston’s experience with K-12 school choice reform over the last half century as a case study, I argue that mechanism design introduces what I call a "normative gap" between the goals pursued by economic designers and those pursued by policymakers.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PSN: Justice (Topic)

自引率

0.00%

发文量