针对投资者保护的公平众筹及其含义的开放原则设置的紧迫性

Inda Rahadiyan, Paripurna P. Sugarda
{"title":"针对投资者保护的公平众筹及其含义的开放原则设置的紧迫性","authors":"Inda Rahadiyan, Paripurna P. Sugarda","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of equity crowdfunding (ECF) is part of capital market activities. Capital market activities prioritize the principle of transparency in order to safeguard the trust of the investors. However, Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulations regarding ECF do not provide clear and adequate arrangements for the obligations of the principle of transparency. The problems studied in this research include: First, what is the urgency of regulating the principle of transparency in ECF? Second, what are the implications of the void in the regulation of the ECF principle of transparency to investor protection? The type of research used is normative legal research. This study uses statutory and conceptual approaches with a qualitative descriptive analysis method. The results of the study conclude: First, considering the crucial role of the principle of transparency as the main principle of the capital market, the existence of regulations regarding the principle of transparency is also needed in the implementation of ECF as part of capital market activities. Second, the absence of regulation regarding transparency in the administration of ECF results in non-optimal legal protection for investors. This is understandable because the substance of the ECF can actually be compared to a public offering in the capital market. In addition, the current OJK regulations related to investor protection have not specifically accommodated the interests of ECF investors. This is due to the nature of the regulation which is still scattered in several regulations and the nature of the regulation which is still repressive.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"19 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urgensi Pengaturan Prinsip Keterbukaan Dalam Equity Crowdfunding Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Perlindungan Investor\",\"authors\":\"Inda Rahadiyan, Paripurna P. Sugarda\",\"doi\":\"10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The implementation of equity crowdfunding (ECF) is part of capital market activities. Capital market activities prioritize the principle of transparency in order to safeguard the trust of the investors. However, Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulations regarding ECF do not provide clear and adequate arrangements for the obligations of the principle of transparency. The problems studied in this research include: First, what is the urgency of regulating the principle of transparency in ECF? Second, what are the implications of the void in the regulation of the ECF principle of transparency to investor protection? The type of research used is normative legal research. This study uses statutory and conceptual approaches with a qualitative descriptive analysis method. The results of the study conclude: First, considering the crucial role of the principle of transparency as the main principle of the capital market, the existence of regulations regarding the principle of transparency is also needed in the implementation of ECF as part of capital market activities. Second, the absence of regulation regarding transparency in the administration of ECF results in non-optimal legal protection for investors. This is understandable because the substance of the ECF can actually be compared to a public offering in the capital market. In addition, the current OJK regulations related to investor protection have not specifically accommodated the interests of ECF investors. This is due to the nature of the regulation which is still scattered in several regulations and the nature of the regulation which is still repressive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

股权众筹的实施是资本市场活动的一部分。资本市场活动优先考虑透明度原则,以维护投资者的信任。然而,金融服务管理局(OJK)关于ECF的规定并没有为透明度原则的义务提供明确和充分的安排。本研究研究的问题包括:第一,规范ECF透明度原则的紧迫性是什么?其次,对ECF透明度原则的监管空白对投资者保护有何影响?所使用的研究类型是规范法律研究。本研究采用法定和概念方法,并采用定性描述性分析方法。研究结果表明:首先,考虑到透明度原则作为资本市场主要原则的关键作用,在实施ECF作为资本市场活动的一部分时,也需要有关透明度原则的法规的存在。其次,缺乏对ECF管理透明度的监管,导致投资者得不到最佳的法律保护。这是可以理解的,因为ECF的实质实际上可以比作资本市场上的公开发行。此外,目前OJK有关投资者保护的规定并没有特别照顾到ECF投资者的利益。这是由于监管的性质仍然分散在几个监管中,以及监管的性质仍然是压制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urgensi Pengaturan Prinsip Keterbukaan Dalam Equity Crowdfunding Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Perlindungan Investor
The implementation of equity crowdfunding (ECF) is part of capital market activities. Capital market activities prioritize the principle of transparency in order to safeguard the trust of the investors. However, Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulations regarding ECF do not provide clear and adequate arrangements for the obligations of the principle of transparency. The problems studied in this research include: First, what is the urgency of regulating the principle of transparency in ECF? Second, what are the implications of the void in the regulation of the ECF principle of transparency to investor protection? The type of research used is normative legal research. This study uses statutory and conceptual approaches with a qualitative descriptive analysis method. The results of the study conclude: First, considering the crucial role of the principle of transparency as the main principle of the capital market, the existence of regulations regarding the principle of transparency is also needed in the implementation of ECF as part of capital market activities. Second, the absence of regulation regarding transparency in the administration of ECF results in non-optimal legal protection for investors. This is understandable because the substance of the ECF can actually be compared to a public offering in the capital market. In addition, the current OJK regulations related to investor protection have not specifically accommodated the interests of ECF investors. This is due to the nature of the regulation which is still scattered in several regulations and the nature of the regulation which is still repressive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信