内部律师与非执行董事:关于最佳实践的讨论

R. Moorhead, T. Clark, A. Brener, P. Gilbert, S. Vaughan
{"title":"内部律师与非执行董事:关于最佳实践的讨论","authors":"R. Moorhead, T. Clark, A. Brener, P. Gilbert, S. Vaughan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3410929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-executive directors (NEDs) perform a central role in corporate governance, in providing effective challenge to executives. In-house lawyers (IHLs) are central to an organisation’s ability to function effectively and within the law. The relationships between the two constituencies is sometimes not as strong as it might be. In this paper we set out a tentative framework to enable businesses to ensure that NEDs and IHLs have a stronger understanding of each other’s roles and how they can support each other in those roles.","PeriodicalId":330356,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","volume":"5 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-House Lawyers and Non-Executive Directors: A Discussion About Best Practice\",\"authors\":\"R. Moorhead, T. Clark, A. Brener, P. Gilbert, S. Vaughan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3410929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-executive directors (NEDs) perform a central role in corporate governance, in providing effective challenge to executives. In-house lawyers (IHLs) are central to an organisation’s ability to function effectively and within the law. The relationships between the two constituencies is sometimes not as strong as it might be. In this paper we set out a tentative framework to enable businesses to ensure that NEDs and IHLs have a stronger understanding of each other’s roles and how they can support each other in those roles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3410929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3410929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非执行董事(NEDs)在公司治理中发挥着核心作用,向高管提供有效的挑战。内部律师(IHLs)是一个组织在法律范围内有效运作的核心。这两个选区之间的关系有时并不像想象的那么牢固。在本文中,我们提出了一个试探性框架,使企业能够确保需求分析人员和内部服务人员对彼此的角色有更深入的了解,以及他们如何在这些角色中相互支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-House Lawyers and Non-Executive Directors: A Discussion About Best Practice
Non-executive directors (NEDs) perform a central role in corporate governance, in providing effective challenge to executives. In-house lawyers (IHLs) are central to an organisation’s ability to function effectively and within the law. The relationships between the two constituencies is sometimes not as strong as it might be. In this paper we set out a tentative framework to enable businesses to ensure that NEDs and IHLs have a stronger understanding of each other’s roles and how they can support each other in those roles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信