加拿大运动治疗新能力框架的发展与验证

M. Lafave, J. Owen, B. Eubank, R. Demont
{"title":"加拿大运动治疗新能力框架的发展与验证","authors":"M. Lafave, J. Owen, B. Eubank, R. Demont","doi":"10.4085/1947-380X-20-080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Competency-based education (CBE) is entrenched in educating health professionals in Canada. CBE is a framework that identifies desired performance characteristics in training competent, entry-level health professionals.\n \n \n \n To update, develop, and validate a new Canadian Athletic Therapists Association (CATA) framework for athletic therapy education.\n \n \n \n Framework development occurred in 4 phases and was developed through a multistage process that involved a scoping review (phase 1) and consensus methodology (ie, a blending of modified Ebel and modified Delphi consensus methods; phases 2–4).\n \n \n \n Phase 2: a total of 7 experts (program directors) from each Canadian accredited institution. Phase 3: a total of 14 experts (1 program director and educational expert from each accredited institution). Phase 4: a total of 7 experts (program directors) and 246 certified members of the CATA.\n \n \n \n Each phase consisted of a systematic process with 80% consensus agreement set a priori. In phase 1, a scoping review was conducted to identify common terminology that could be used to guide the framework development process and to identify competency frameworks used by other health professional organizations. Phase 2 consisted of adopting a common language that would serve to keep the expert group on the task at hand and avoid confusion. In phase 3, frameworks used by other health professional organizations were evaluated and used to determine the validity of the old CATA framework. In phase 4, the old CATA framework was updated and a new framework was developed and validated.\n \n \n \n In phase 1, the result of the scoping review yielded 368 papers, of which 5 were used to propose a common language for phase 2 and 9 highlighted competency frameworks used by other health professions for comparison in phase 3. In phase 3, the expert group voted unanimously to adopt and adapt the CanMEDS framework (ie, roles). In phase 4, the new CATA competency framework was validated, and most competencies achieved consensus. Competencies that did not achieve consensus in the first round of voting underwent face-to-face discussions via videoconferencing. After discussions, the remaining competencies were revised, and all newly worded competencies achieved consensus.\n \n \n \n The resultant framework was validated, and most competencies achieved consensus. The new athletic therapy competency framework outlines the 165 competencies resulting from this methodical process and will hopefully facilitate interdisciplinary communication and practice.\n","PeriodicalId":448792,"journal":{"name":"Athletic training education journal","volume":"5 19","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a New Competency Framework for Athletic Therapy in Canada\",\"authors\":\"M. Lafave, J. Owen, B. Eubank, R. Demont\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1947-380X-20-080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Competency-based education (CBE) is entrenched in educating health professionals in Canada. CBE is a framework that identifies desired performance characteristics in training competent, entry-level health professionals.\\n \\n \\n \\n To update, develop, and validate a new Canadian Athletic Therapists Association (CATA) framework for athletic therapy education.\\n \\n \\n \\n Framework development occurred in 4 phases and was developed through a multistage process that involved a scoping review (phase 1) and consensus methodology (ie, a blending of modified Ebel and modified Delphi consensus methods; phases 2–4).\\n \\n \\n \\n Phase 2: a total of 7 experts (program directors) from each Canadian accredited institution. Phase 3: a total of 14 experts (1 program director and educational expert from each accredited institution). Phase 4: a total of 7 experts (program directors) and 246 certified members of the CATA.\\n \\n \\n \\n Each phase consisted of a systematic process with 80% consensus agreement set a priori. In phase 1, a scoping review was conducted to identify common terminology that could be used to guide the framework development process and to identify competency frameworks used by other health professional organizations. Phase 2 consisted of adopting a common language that would serve to keep the expert group on the task at hand and avoid confusion. In phase 3, frameworks used by other health professional organizations were evaluated and used to determine the validity of the old CATA framework. In phase 4, the old CATA framework was updated and a new framework was developed and validated.\\n \\n \\n \\n In phase 1, the result of the scoping review yielded 368 papers, of which 5 were used to propose a common language for phase 2 and 9 highlighted competency frameworks used by other health professions for comparison in phase 3. In phase 3, the expert group voted unanimously to adopt and adapt the CanMEDS framework (ie, roles). In phase 4, the new CATA competency framework was validated, and most competencies achieved consensus. Competencies that did not achieve consensus in the first round of voting underwent face-to-face discussions via videoconferencing. After discussions, the remaining competencies were revised, and all newly worded competencies achieved consensus.\\n \\n \\n \\n The resultant framework was validated, and most competencies achieved consensus. The new athletic therapy competency framework outlines the 165 competencies resulting from this methodical process and will hopefully facilitate interdisciplinary communication and practice.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":448792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Athletic training education journal\",\"volume\":\"5 19\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Athletic training education journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1947-380X-20-080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athletic training education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1947-380X-20-080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在加拿大,以能力为基础的教育在卫生专业人员的教育中根深蒂固。CBE是一个框架,用于确定培训合格的初级卫生专业人员所需的绩效特征。更新、发展和验证新的加拿大运动治疗师协会(CATA)运动治疗教育框架。框架开发分4个阶段进行,并通过多阶段过程进行开发,其中包括范围审查(第一阶段)和共识方法(即混合修改后的Ebel和修改后的Delphi共识方法);阶段2 - 4)。第二阶段:各加拿大认证机构共7名专家(项目主任)。第三阶段:共14名专家(各认证机构1名项目主任和教育专家)。第四阶段:共有7名专家(项目主管)和246名CATA认证会员。每个阶段都是一个系统的过程,80%的共识是先验设定的。在第一阶段,进行了范围界定审查,以确定可用于指导框架制定进程的通用术语,并确定其他卫生专业组织使用的能力框架。第2阶段包括采用一种共同语言,使专家组能够专注于手头的任务并避免混淆。在第3阶段,对其他卫生专业组织使用的框架进行了评估,并用于确定旧的CATA框架的有效性。在第4阶段,更新旧的CATA框架,并开发和验证新框架。在第一阶段,范围审查的结果产生了368篇论文,其中5篇用于提出第二阶段的共同语言,9篇强调了其他卫生专业人员使用的能力框架,以便在第三阶段进行比较。在阶段3中,专家组一致投票通过并调整CanMEDS框架(即角色)。在第四阶段,新的CATA胜任力框架得到了验证,大多数胜任力达成了共识。在第一轮投票中未能达成协商一致意见的能力通过视频会议进行了面对面讨论。经过讨论,对剩余的胜任能力进行了修订,所有新措词的胜任能力都取得了协商一致意见。最终的框架得到了验证,并且大多数胜任能力达成了共识。新的运动治疗能力框架概述了这种有条不紊的过程产生的165种能力,并有望促进跨学科的交流和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of a New Competency Framework for Athletic Therapy in Canada
Competency-based education (CBE) is entrenched in educating health professionals in Canada. CBE is a framework that identifies desired performance characteristics in training competent, entry-level health professionals. To update, develop, and validate a new Canadian Athletic Therapists Association (CATA) framework for athletic therapy education. Framework development occurred in 4 phases and was developed through a multistage process that involved a scoping review (phase 1) and consensus methodology (ie, a blending of modified Ebel and modified Delphi consensus methods; phases 2–4). Phase 2: a total of 7 experts (program directors) from each Canadian accredited institution. Phase 3: a total of 14 experts (1 program director and educational expert from each accredited institution). Phase 4: a total of 7 experts (program directors) and 246 certified members of the CATA. Each phase consisted of a systematic process with 80% consensus agreement set a priori. In phase 1, a scoping review was conducted to identify common terminology that could be used to guide the framework development process and to identify competency frameworks used by other health professional organizations. Phase 2 consisted of adopting a common language that would serve to keep the expert group on the task at hand and avoid confusion. In phase 3, frameworks used by other health professional organizations were evaluated and used to determine the validity of the old CATA framework. In phase 4, the old CATA framework was updated and a new framework was developed and validated. In phase 1, the result of the scoping review yielded 368 papers, of which 5 were used to propose a common language for phase 2 and 9 highlighted competency frameworks used by other health professions for comparison in phase 3. In phase 3, the expert group voted unanimously to adopt and adapt the CanMEDS framework (ie, roles). In phase 4, the new CATA competency framework was validated, and most competencies achieved consensus. Competencies that did not achieve consensus in the first round of voting underwent face-to-face discussions via videoconferencing. After discussions, the remaining competencies were revised, and all newly worded competencies achieved consensus. The resultant framework was validated, and most competencies achieved consensus. The new athletic therapy competency framework outlines the 165 competencies resulting from this methodical process and will hopefully facilitate interdisciplinary communication and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信