{"title":"案例-工具评估的方法","authors":"A. Hierholzer, G. Herzwurm","doi":"10.1109/AST.1996.506485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the efficiency of international CASE tools, which were offered on the German market in 1994. In considering a catalogue of more than 400 criteria, which has been developed in cooperation with industry, 17 CASE tools are evaluated in the scope of a case study. Both the specific requirements of a CASE user and the common requirements derived from the ISO 9000 are taken into account as well.","PeriodicalId":427825,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Assessment of Software Tools","volume":" 17","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology of a CASE-tool assessment\",\"authors\":\"A. Hierholzer, G. Herzwurm\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AST.1996.506485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the efficiency of international CASE tools, which were offered on the German market in 1994. In considering a catalogue of more than 400 criteria, which has been developed in cooperation with industry, 17 CASE tools are evaluated in the scope of a case study. Both the specific requirements of a CASE user and the common requirements derived from the ISO 9000 are taken into account as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Assessment of Software Tools\",\"volume\":\" 17\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Assessment of Software Tools\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AST.1996.506485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Assessment of Software Tools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AST.1996.506485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper investigates the efficiency of international CASE tools, which were offered on the German market in 1994. In considering a catalogue of more than 400 criteria, which has been developed in cooperation with industry, 17 CASE tools are evaluated in the scope of a case study. Both the specific requirements of a CASE user and the common requirements derived from the ISO 9000 are taken into account as well.