品牌争议解决(气味浓烈对配方的案例研究)

Wajah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-10-14 DOI:10.33087/wjh.v6i2.879
Haura Jauza Hafizah, Rani Apriani
{"title":"品牌争议解决(气味浓烈对配方的案例研究)","authors":"Haura Jauza Hafizah, Rani Apriani","doi":"10.33087/wjh.v6i2.879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A brand is the essence of an item or service that refers to the quality and value of its owner. Famous brands are popular and familiar brands and have a high reputation. The abuse of their genuine brand is the product of those who want to seek profits that would harm their true owners. The study will examine the process of settling their disputes and the judge's ruling in the issue of pepsodent strong v formula strong. The study uses normative jurisdictional methods based on laws in Indonesia that apply to the primary law code, legislation no. 20 in 2016 on brands and geographical indications and secondary legal materials: journal, article, paper associated with brand. The results of the research on brand dispute resolution in Indonesia there are two ways, namely litigation by commercial courts and non-litigation through alternative dispute resolution or arbitration. The settlement used in the case of Hardwood Private Limited and PT Unilever tbk. carried out by Litigation in the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta Court.","PeriodicalId":283705,"journal":{"name":"Wajah Hukum","volume":" January","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek (Studi Kasus Pepsodent Strong vs Formula Strong)\",\"authors\":\"Haura Jauza Hafizah, Rani Apriani\",\"doi\":\"10.33087/wjh.v6i2.879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A brand is the essence of an item or service that refers to the quality and value of its owner. Famous brands are popular and familiar brands and have a high reputation. The abuse of their genuine brand is the product of those who want to seek profits that would harm their true owners. The study will examine the process of settling their disputes and the judge's ruling in the issue of pepsodent strong v formula strong. The study uses normative jurisdictional methods based on laws in Indonesia that apply to the primary law code, legislation no. 20 in 2016 on brands and geographical indications and secondary legal materials: journal, article, paper associated with brand. The results of the research on brand dispute resolution in Indonesia there are two ways, namely litigation by commercial courts and non-litigation through alternative dispute resolution or arbitration. The settlement used in the case of Hardwood Private Limited and PT Unilever tbk. carried out by Litigation in the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wajah Hukum\",\"volume\":\" January\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wajah Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wajah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

品牌是一个项目或服务的本质,指的是其所有者的质量和价值。名牌是受欢迎和熟悉的品牌,具有很高的声誉。滥用他们的真正品牌是那些想要寻求利润的人的产物,这将损害他们真正的所有者。该研究将考察他们解决纠纷的过程和法官在人强vs公式强问题上的裁决。本研究采用了基于适用于主要法典的印度尼西亚法律的规范性司法方法。2016年20篇关于品牌和地理标志及二手法律资料:与品牌相关的期刊、文章、论文。印尼品牌纠纷解决的研究结果有两种方式,即通过商事法庭诉讼和通过替代性争议解决或仲裁的非诉讼方式。在Hardwood Private Limited和PT Unilever tbk案中使用的和解协议。由雅加达中央法院商事法庭的诉讼进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek (Studi Kasus Pepsodent Strong vs Formula Strong)
A brand is the essence of an item or service that refers to the quality and value of its owner. Famous brands are popular and familiar brands and have a high reputation. The abuse of their genuine brand is the product of those who want to seek profits that would harm their true owners. The study will examine the process of settling their disputes and the judge's ruling in the issue of pepsodent strong v formula strong. The study uses normative jurisdictional methods based on laws in Indonesia that apply to the primary law code, legislation no. 20 in 2016 on brands and geographical indications and secondary legal materials: journal, article, paper associated with brand. The results of the research on brand dispute resolution in Indonesia there are two ways, namely litigation by commercial courts and non-litigation through alternative dispute resolution or arbitration. The settlement used in the case of Hardwood Private Limited and PT Unilever tbk. carried out by Litigation in the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信