抗体亲和力:免疫遗传学方面和与免疫复合物疾病的关系。

M W Steward
{"title":"抗体亲和力:免疫遗传学方面和与免疫复合物疾病的关系。","authors":"M W Steward","doi":"10.1136/jcp.s3-13.1.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Itisnowwidely accepted that theimmuneresponse isundera variety ofgenetic controls which, in several instances, arelinked tothemajorhistocompatibility locus (McDevitt andBenacerraf, 1969; Benacerraf andMcDevitt, 1972;Benacerraf and Katz,1975). Thefunctional expression ofsuch autosomal-dominant genetic control ismediated through theco-operative interactions ofB andT lymphocytes andmacrophages. Inaddition, afurther aspect ofthegenetic control oftheimmuneresponse hasbeendescribed byBiozzi andhiscoworkers (Biozzi etal., 1968) inwhichthecharacteristic of 'general immuneresponsiveness' ispolygenically controlled byagroupofabout 10independent loci. Thecontrol ofthischaracteristic appears tobe antigen non-specific andtobeexpressed primarily at thelevel ofthemacrophage. Morerecently, however, evidence hasbeenaccumulating whichindicates that there isanadditional genetically-controlled parameteroftheimmuneresponse, that ofthequality or affinity ofantibody. Inthis paper theevidence forthe genetic control ofantibody affinity anditspossible relationship tothedevelopment ofimmunecomplex disease will bediscussed. Evidence forgenetic control ofantibody affinity Although strain-related variations in thefine specificity ofantibodies toavariety ofantigens in mice, guinea-pigs, andrats havebeenrecognised by workers inseveral laboratories forsometime(for example, Yoshida etal., 1970; Pauletal., 1970), direct evidence forthegenetic control ofantibody affinity hasonlyrecently becomeavailable. The demonstration ofconsistent strain-related variations inmiceoftheaffinity ofantibody produced to humanserumalbumin (HSA), transferrin (HST), the DNP hapten, and streptococcal carbohydrate injected insaline (Soothill andSteward, 1971; Petty etal., 1972; andunpublished observations) wasthe first indication that affinity wasgenetically determined. However, suchstrain-related differences werenot observed whentheantigen wasadministered in complete Freund's adjuvant (Soothill andSteward, 1971). Subsequently breeding studies wereperformed withinbred strains ofmiceproducing either highor lowaffinity antibody toHSA orHST injected in saline. Analysis oftheaffinity ofantibody produced in theparents, Fl hybrids, andbackcrosses hasdemonstrated thatantibody affinity isunder polygenic control. Themeanaffinity value intheFl hybrids ofahigh-affinity strain andalow-affinity strain wasintermediate between themeanvalues of thetwoparental strains. Inthebackcrosses segregation ofaffinity values wasobserved, whichwas consistent withsomeformofgenetic control. Thus thedistribution ofaffinity values inthe(F1x high affinity parent) backcrosses wasnotsignificantly different fromthatofthehighaffinity parents and thedistribution ofaffinity values inthe(F1x low affinity parent) backcrosses wasnotsignificantly different fromthatofthelowaffinity parents.","PeriodicalId":75996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathology. Supplement (Royal College of Pathologists)","volume":"13 ","pages":"120-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jcp.s3-13.1.120","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibody affinity: immunogenetic aspects and relationship to immune complex disease.\",\"authors\":\"M W Steward\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jcp.s3-13.1.120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Itisnowwidely accepted that theimmuneresponse isundera variety ofgenetic controls which, in several instances, arelinked tothemajorhistocompatibility locus (McDevitt andBenacerraf, 1969; Benacerraf andMcDevitt, 1972;Benacerraf and Katz,1975). Thefunctional expression ofsuch autosomal-dominant genetic control ismediated through theco-operative interactions ofB andT lymphocytes andmacrophages. Inaddition, afurther aspect ofthegenetic control oftheimmuneresponse hasbeendescribed byBiozzi andhiscoworkers (Biozzi etal., 1968) inwhichthecharacteristic of 'general immuneresponsiveness' ispolygenically controlled byagroupofabout 10independent loci. Thecontrol ofthischaracteristic appears tobe antigen non-specific andtobeexpressed primarily at thelevel ofthemacrophage. Morerecently, however, evidence hasbeenaccumulating whichindicates that there isanadditional genetically-controlled parameteroftheimmuneresponse, that ofthequality or affinity ofantibody. Inthis paper theevidence forthe genetic control ofantibody affinity anditspossible relationship tothedevelopment ofimmunecomplex disease will bediscussed. Evidence forgenetic control ofantibody affinity Although strain-related variations in thefine specificity ofantibodies toavariety ofantigens in mice, guinea-pigs, andrats havebeenrecognised by workers inseveral laboratories forsometime(for example, Yoshida etal., 1970; Pauletal., 1970), direct evidence forthegenetic control ofantibody affinity hasonlyrecently becomeavailable. The demonstration ofconsistent strain-related variations inmiceoftheaffinity ofantibody produced to humanserumalbumin (HSA), transferrin (HST), the DNP hapten, and streptococcal carbohydrate injected insaline (Soothill andSteward, 1971; Petty etal., 1972; andunpublished observations) wasthe first indication that affinity wasgenetically determined. However, suchstrain-related differences werenot observed whentheantigen wasadministered in complete Freund's adjuvant (Soothill andSteward, 1971). Subsequently breeding studies wereperformed withinbred strains ofmiceproducing either highor lowaffinity antibody toHSA orHST injected in saline. Analysis oftheaffinity ofantibody produced in theparents, Fl hybrids, andbackcrosses hasdemonstrated thatantibody affinity isunder polygenic control. Themeanaffinity value intheFl hybrids ofahigh-affinity strain andalow-affinity strain wasintermediate between themeanvalues of thetwoparental strains. Inthebackcrosses segregation ofaffinity values wasobserved, whichwas consistent withsomeformofgenetic control. Thus thedistribution ofaffinity values inthe(F1x high affinity parent) backcrosses wasnotsignificantly different fromthatofthehighaffinity parents and thedistribution ofaffinity values inthe(F1x low affinity parent) backcrosses wasnotsignificantly different fromthatofthelowaffinity parents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical pathology. Supplement (Royal College of Pathologists)\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"120-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jcp.s3-13.1.120\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical pathology. Supplement (Royal College of Pathologists)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.s3-13.1.120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pathology. Supplement (Royal College of Pathologists)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.s3-13.1.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibody affinity: immunogenetic aspects and relationship to immune complex disease.
Itisnowwidely accepted that theimmuneresponse isundera variety ofgenetic controls which, in several instances, arelinked tothemajorhistocompatibility locus (McDevitt andBenacerraf, 1969; Benacerraf andMcDevitt, 1972;Benacerraf and Katz,1975). Thefunctional expression ofsuch autosomal-dominant genetic control ismediated through theco-operative interactions ofB andT lymphocytes andmacrophages. Inaddition, afurther aspect ofthegenetic control oftheimmuneresponse hasbeendescribed byBiozzi andhiscoworkers (Biozzi etal., 1968) inwhichthecharacteristic of 'general immuneresponsiveness' ispolygenically controlled byagroupofabout 10independent loci. Thecontrol ofthischaracteristic appears tobe antigen non-specific andtobeexpressed primarily at thelevel ofthemacrophage. Morerecently, however, evidence hasbeenaccumulating whichindicates that there isanadditional genetically-controlled parameteroftheimmuneresponse, that ofthequality or affinity ofantibody. Inthis paper theevidence forthe genetic control ofantibody affinity anditspossible relationship tothedevelopment ofimmunecomplex disease will bediscussed. Evidence forgenetic control ofantibody affinity Although strain-related variations in thefine specificity ofantibodies toavariety ofantigens in mice, guinea-pigs, andrats havebeenrecognised by workers inseveral laboratories forsometime(for example, Yoshida etal., 1970; Pauletal., 1970), direct evidence forthegenetic control ofantibody affinity hasonlyrecently becomeavailable. The demonstration ofconsistent strain-related variations inmiceoftheaffinity ofantibody produced to humanserumalbumin (HSA), transferrin (HST), the DNP hapten, and streptococcal carbohydrate injected insaline (Soothill andSteward, 1971; Petty etal., 1972; andunpublished observations) wasthe first indication that affinity wasgenetically determined. However, suchstrain-related differences werenot observed whentheantigen wasadministered in complete Freund's adjuvant (Soothill andSteward, 1971). Subsequently breeding studies wereperformed withinbred strains ofmiceproducing either highor lowaffinity antibody toHSA orHST injected in saline. Analysis oftheaffinity ofantibody produced in theparents, Fl hybrids, andbackcrosses hasdemonstrated thatantibody affinity isunder polygenic control. Themeanaffinity value intheFl hybrids ofahigh-affinity strain andalow-affinity strain wasintermediate between themeanvalues of thetwoparental strains. Inthebackcrosses segregation ofaffinity values wasobserved, whichwas consistent withsomeformofgenetic control. Thus thedistribution ofaffinity values inthe(F1x high affinity parent) backcrosses wasnotsignificantly different fromthatofthehighaffinity parents and thedistribution ofaffinity values inthe(F1x low affinity parent) backcrosses wasnotsignificantly different fromthatofthelowaffinity parents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信