跨越rubicon:探索创伤性肢体游离组织移植术中不同的围手术期液体复苏策略-回顾性病例对照研究

Efstathios Karamanos, Rajaie Hazboun, Noah Saad, Alyssa Langley, Ahmed A. Makhani, Ameesh N. Dev, Howard T. Wang, Douglas Cromack
{"title":"跨越rubicon:探索创伤性肢体游离组织移植术中不同的围手术期液体复苏策略-回顾性病例对照研究","authors":"Efstathios Karamanos,&nbsp;Rajaie Hazboun,&nbsp;Noah Saad,&nbsp;Alyssa Langley,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Makhani,&nbsp;Ameesh N. Dev,&nbsp;Howard T. Wang,&nbsp;Douglas Cromack","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2021.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Free tissue transfer has added to the plastic surgeon's armamentarium and has afforded patients more chances towards limb salvage in recent decades following severe trauma. Venous congestion is a common occurrence, can be the result of several reasons and has devastating results in patients' outcomes. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of restrictive fluid administration. We hypothesized that a restrictive fluid administration in the intra – operative period would be associated with a lower incidence of venous congestion in patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of traumatic defects of the extremities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients undergoing a perforator free flap soft tissue reconstruction of traumatic defects of the extremities, from 2005 to 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patient's demographics, comorbidities and technical aspects of the operation were extracted. The study population was divided in two groups based on the amount of fluids administered (restrictive: &lt; 6 ml/kg/hr; liberal: ≥ 6 ml/kg/hr). Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the impact of fluid strategy on the development of clinically significant venous congestion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 75 patients were identified. Out of these, 24 patients had clinically significant venous congestion. Fluid administration strategy [AOR (95% CI): 1.53 (1.22, 1.92)], use of the superficial venous system [0.03 (0.01, 0.26)], operative time [1.98 (1.97, 1.99)] and age&gt;50 [5.60 (1.10, 28.52)]. A cut – off analysis identified 6 ml/kg/hr as the cut off point for fluid administration. Liberal fluid administration (≥6 ml/kg/hr) was independently associated with a higher incidence of venous congestion and return to the OR for flap debridement, both overall and after exclusion of anastomotic revisions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Venous congestion in free flap reconstruction following traumatic defects of the extremities remains high. Several factors are associated with congestion. Liberal fluid administration ≥6 ml/kg/hr is independently associated with this complications and should be avoided when possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 6-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orthop.2021.02.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crossing the rubicon: Exploring different peri – Operative fluid resuscitation strategies in traumatic extremity free tissue transfer- a retrospective case control study\",\"authors\":\"Efstathios Karamanos,&nbsp;Rajaie Hazboun,&nbsp;Noah Saad,&nbsp;Alyssa Langley,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Makhani,&nbsp;Ameesh N. Dev,&nbsp;Howard T. Wang,&nbsp;Douglas Cromack\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orthop.2021.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Free tissue transfer has added to the plastic surgeon's armamentarium and has afforded patients more chances towards limb salvage in recent decades following severe trauma. Venous congestion is a common occurrence, can be the result of several reasons and has devastating results in patients' outcomes. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of restrictive fluid administration. We hypothesized that a restrictive fluid administration in the intra – operative period would be associated with a lower incidence of venous congestion in patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of traumatic defects of the extremities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients undergoing a perforator free flap soft tissue reconstruction of traumatic defects of the extremities, from 2005 to 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patient's demographics, comorbidities and technical aspects of the operation were extracted. The study population was divided in two groups based on the amount of fluids administered (restrictive: &lt; 6 ml/kg/hr; liberal: ≥ 6 ml/kg/hr). Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the impact of fluid strategy on the development of clinically significant venous congestion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 75 patients were identified. Out of these, 24 patients had clinically significant venous congestion. Fluid administration strategy [AOR (95% CI): 1.53 (1.22, 1.92)], use of the superficial venous system [0.03 (0.01, 0.26)], operative time [1.98 (1.97, 1.99)] and age&gt;50 [5.60 (1.10, 28.52)]. A cut – off analysis identified 6 ml/kg/hr as the cut off point for fluid administration. Liberal fluid administration (≥6 ml/kg/hr) was independently associated with a higher incidence of venous congestion and return to the OR for flap debridement, both overall and after exclusion of anastomotic revisions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Venous congestion in free flap reconstruction following traumatic defects of the extremities remains high. Several factors are associated with congestion. Liberal fluid administration ≥6 ml/kg/hr is independently associated with this complications and should be avoided when possible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthoplastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 6-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orthop.2021.02.003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthoplastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X21000063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X21000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,自由组织移植增加了整形外科医生的装备,并为严重创伤后的患者提供了更多挽救肢体的机会。静脉充血是一种常见的现象,可能是多种原因的结果,对患者的预后具有破坏性的结果。最近的研究强调了限制性液体管理的重要性。我们假设,在手术期间限制性液体的管理将与静脉充血的发生率较低的患者接受创伤性肢体缺损自由皮瓣重建。方法回顾性分析2005 ~ 2019年行无穿支皮瓣修复四肢创伤性缺损的病例。提取患者的人口统计学、合并症和手术的技术方面。研究人群根据给予的液体量分为两组(限制性:<6毫升/公斤/小时;自由:≥6ml /kg/hr)。进行多变量分析以确定液体策略对临床显著静脉充血发展的影响。结果共鉴定出75例患者。其中,24例患者有明显的临床静脉充血。液体给药策略[AOR (95% CI): 1.53(1.22, 1.92)],浅表静脉系统使用[0.03(0.01,0.26)],手术时间[1.98(1.97,1.99)]和年龄[5.60(1.10,28.52)]。截断分析确定6毫升/公斤/小时为液体给药的截断点。自由液体给药(≥6 ml/kg/hr)与静脉充血和皮瓣清创的高发生率独立相关,无论是总体上还是排除吻合口修复后。结论外伤性肢体缺损游离皮瓣重建中静脉充血率居高不下。有几个因素与拥堵有关。自由液体给药≥6ml /kg/hr与该并发症独立相关,应尽可能避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crossing the rubicon: Exploring different peri – Operative fluid resuscitation strategies in traumatic extremity free tissue transfer- a retrospective case control study

Introduction

Free tissue transfer has added to the plastic surgeon's armamentarium and has afforded patients more chances towards limb salvage in recent decades following severe trauma. Venous congestion is a common occurrence, can be the result of several reasons and has devastating results in patients' outcomes. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of restrictive fluid administration. We hypothesized that a restrictive fluid administration in the intra – operative period would be associated with a lower incidence of venous congestion in patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of traumatic defects of the extremities.

Methods

All patients undergoing a perforator free flap soft tissue reconstruction of traumatic defects of the extremities, from 2005 to 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patient's demographics, comorbidities and technical aspects of the operation were extracted. The study population was divided in two groups based on the amount of fluids administered (restrictive: < 6 ml/kg/hr; liberal: ≥ 6 ml/kg/hr). Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the impact of fluid strategy on the development of clinically significant venous congestion.

Results

A total of 75 patients were identified. Out of these, 24 patients had clinically significant venous congestion. Fluid administration strategy [AOR (95% CI): 1.53 (1.22, 1.92)], use of the superficial venous system [0.03 (0.01, 0.26)], operative time [1.98 (1.97, 1.99)] and age>50 [5.60 (1.10, 28.52)]. A cut – off analysis identified 6 ml/kg/hr as the cut off point for fluid administration. Liberal fluid administration (≥6 ml/kg/hr) was independently associated with a higher incidence of venous congestion and return to the OR for flap debridement, both overall and after exclusion of anastomotic revisions.

Conclusions

Venous congestion in free flap reconstruction following traumatic defects of the extremities remains high. Several factors are associated with congestion. Liberal fluid administration ≥6 ml/kg/hr is independently associated with this complications and should be avoided when possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信