在智利一所大学实施能力教育3年后的教学实践

Carmen Gloria Pérez, Samantha Clem
{"title":"在智利一所大学实施能力教育3年后的教学实践","authors":"Carmen Gloria Pérez,&nbsp;Samantha Clem","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Over the last 10 years, most traditional Chilean universities have declared an institutional conversion to competency-based education (CBE).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study seeks to determine if those systemic changes are reaching a practical level by analyzing the conceptualizations that university professors have of their teaching practice and whether or not they are in line with CBE guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two self-written reports describing current teaching practices were taken from professors at a competency-based university. The Content Analysis technique was used, analyzing the frequency and standardization in which certain words or phrases appeared in the text and their relation or counter-relation to CBE, thus determining the conceptual patterns that regulate current teaching methods at the university.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results show that the most common words used to describe teaching practices were contrary with concepts that should be present in a competency system, including mainly teacher-centered lecture classes that values passing exams over mastering skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Professors have not internalized their role in the CBE system in which they currently find themselves. A traditional model of education is still prominent, and if that is to change professors need to receive further training on what CBE is and what is their specific role within that system. If additional steps are not taken to change the conceptualizations on teaching practices that the professors have, the university's conversion into CBE will remain as merely rhetorical and not practical.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1054","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching practices at a Chilean university 3 years after conversion to competency-based education\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Gloria Pérez,&nbsp;Samantha Clem\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cbe2.1054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Over the last 10 years, most traditional Chilean universities have declared an institutional conversion to competency-based education (CBE).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study seeks to determine if those systemic changes are reaching a practical level by analyzing the conceptualizations that university professors have of their teaching practice and whether or not they are in line with CBE guidelines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-two self-written reports describing current teaching practices were taken from professors at a competency-based university. The Content Analysis technique was used, analyzing the frequency and standardization in which certain words or phrases appeared in the text and their relation or counter-relation to CBE, thus determining the conceptual patterns that regulate current teaching methods at the university.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results show that the most common words used to describe teaching practices were contrary with concepts that should be present in a competency system, including mainly teacher-centered lecture classes that values passing exams over mastering skills.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Professors have not internalized their role in the CBE system in which they currently find themselves. A traditional model of education is still prominent, and if that is to change professors need to receive further training on what CBE is and what is their specific role within that system. If additional steps are not taken to change the conceptualizations on teaching practices that the professors have, the university's conversion into CBE will remain as merely rhetorical and not practical.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1054\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在过去的10年里,大多数传统的智利大学都宣布了向能力教育(CBE)的体制转变。本研究旨在通过分析大学教授对其教学实践的概念,以及他们是否符合CBE指南,来确定这些系统性变化是否达到了实际水平。方法选取某能力型大学教授的22份描述当前教学实践的自写报告。使用内容分析技术,分析某些单词或短语在文本中出现的频率和标准化,以及它们与CBE的关系或反关系,从而确定规范当前大学教学方法的概念模式。结果结果表明,用于描述教学实践的最常用词汇与能力体系中应该存在的概念相反,包括主要以教师为中心的讲座课程,重视通过考试而不是掌握技能。教授们还没有内化他们在CBE体系中的角色,他们目前发现自己在CBE体系中。传统的教育模式仍然很突出,如果要改变这种模式,教授需要接受进一步的培训,了解什么是CBE,以及他们在该体系中的具体角色是什么。如果不采取进一步措施改变教授们对教学实践的观念,那么大学向CBE的转变将仅仅是口头上的,而不是实际的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Teaching practices at a Chilean university 3 years after conversion to competency-based education

Teaching practices at a Chilean university 3 years after conversion to competency-based education

Background

Over the last 10 years, most traditional Chilean universities have declared an institutional conversion to competency-based education (CBE).

Objectives

This study seeks to determine if those systemic changes are reaching a practical level by analyzing the conceptualizations that university professors have of their teaching practice and whether or not they are in line with CBE guidelines.

Methods

Twenty-two self-written reports describing current teaching practices were taken from professors at a competency-based university. The Content Analysis technique was used, analyzing the frequency and standardization in which certain words or phrases appeared in the text and their relation or counter-relation to CBE, thus determining the conceptual patterns that regulate current teaching methods at the university.

Results

The results show that the most common words used to describe teaching practices were contrary with concepts that should be present in a competency system, including mainly teacher-centered lecture classes that values passing exams over mastering skills.

Conclusion

Professors have not internalized their role in the CBE system in which they currently find themselves. A traditional model of education is still prominent, and if that is to change professors need to receive further training on what CBE is and what is their specific role within that system. If additional steps are not taken to change the conceptualizations on teaching practices that the professors have, the university's conversion into CBE will remain as merely rhetorical and not practical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信