马塔米内拉区自然感染牛中间日锥虫感染诊断技术评价。

Jefferson Filgueira Alcindo, Maria Clara Guimarães Vieira, Thamiris Vilela Pereira Rocha, Cinthya Brillante Cardinot, Maurício Deschk, Gláucia Guimarães Amaral, Rafael Ferreira de Araujo, Carina Franciscato, Kayo José Garcia de Almeida Castilho Neto, Rosângela Zacarias Machado, Marcos Rogério André
{"title":"马塔米内拉区自然感染牛中间日锥虫感染诊断技术评价。","authors":"Jefferson Filgueira Alcindo,&nbsp;Maria Clara Guimarães Vieira,&nbsp;Thamiris Vilela Pereira Rocha,&nbsp;Cinthya Brillante Cardinot,&nbsp;Maurício Deschk,&nbsp;Gláucia Guimarães Amaral,&nbsp;Rafael Ferreira de Araujo,&nbsp;Carina Franciscato,&nbsp;Kayo José Garcia de Almeida Castilho Neto,&nbsp;Rosângela Zacarias Machado,&nbsp;Marcos Rogério André","doi":"10.1590/S1984-29612022007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic techniques for trypanosomiasis, caused by Trypanosoma vivax, in naturally infected cattle in Minas Gerais, Zona da Mata. The deaths of six lactating cows with similar clinical conditions-characterized by hyporexia, hypogalactia, and recumbency-had been reported from one property. Initially, two animals were examined and diagnosed with trypanosomiasis through identification of the protozoan in a blood smear. After the initial diagnosis, all lactating cows (n=37) on the property were examined, and blood samples were collected for tests including whole blood smear, buffy coat smear, Woo's technique, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Woo's test, buffy coat smears, and whole blood smears indicated that 4/37 (10.81%) animals were positive for trypanosomiasis, whereas ELISA and PCR indicated that 33/37 (89.19%) and 27/37 (72.97%) animals, respectively, were positive. The agreement obtained between parasitological techniques was classified as high, while between ELISA and PCR, no agreement. In conclusion, parasitological techniques have a low capacity to identify infected animals in the chronic stage of T. vivax infection. Therefore, techniques such as PCR and/or ELISA should be used to minimize the occurrence of false negatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":21270,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria","volume":"31 1","pages":"e018021"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of techniques for diagnosis of Trypanosoma vivax infections in naturally infected cattle in the Zona da Mata Mineira.\",\"authors\":\"Jefferson Filgueira Alcindo,&nbsp;Maria Clara Guimarães Vieira,&nbsp;Thamiris Vilela Pereira Rocha,&nbsp;Cinthya Brillante Cardinot,&nbsp;Maurício Deschk,&nbsp;Gláucia Guimarães Amaral,&nbsp;Rafael Ferreira de Araujo,&nbsp;Carina Franciscato,&nbsp;Kayo José Garcia de Almeida Castilho Neto,&nbsp;Rosângela Zacarias Machado,&nbsp;Marcos Rogério André\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1984-29612022007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic techniques for trypanosomiasis, caused by Trypanosoma vivax, in naturally infected cattle in Minas Gerais, Zona da Mata. The deaths of six lactating cows with similar clinical conditions-characterized by hyporexia, hypogalactia, and recumbency-had been reported from one property. Initially, two animals were examined and diagnosed with trypanosomiasis through identification of the protozoan in a blood smear. After the initial diagnosis, all lactating cows (n=37) on the property were examined, and blood samples were collected for tests including whole blood smear, buffy coat smear, Woo's technique, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Woo's test, buffy coat smears, and whole blood smears indicated that 4/37 (10.81%) animals were positive for trypanosomiasis, whereas ELISA and PCR indicated that 33/37 (89.19%) and 27/37 (72.97%) animals, respectively, were positive. The agreement obtained between parasitological techniques was classified as high, while between ELISA and PCR, no agreement. In conclusion, parasitological techniques have a low capacity to identify infected animals in the chronic stage of T. vivax infection. Therefore, techniques such as PCR and/or ELISA should be used to minimize the occurrence of false negatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"e018021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612022007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612022007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价由间日锥虫引起的锥虫病在米纳斯吉拉斯州达马塔区自然感染牛中的诊断技术。有6头哺乳期奶牛因类似的临床症状——低氧、低乳量和躺卧——死亡的报道来自同一属性。最初,对两只动物进行了检查,并通过血液涂片中原生动物的鉴定诊断为锥虫病。初步诊断后,对该牧场所有泌乳奶牛(n=37)进行检查,采集血样进行全血涂片、黄毛涂片、Woo技术、酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测。吴氏试验、白毛涂片和全血涂片检测结果为4/37 (10.81%),ELISA和PCR检测结果分别为33/37(89.19%)和27/37(72.97%)。两种方法的一致性较高,而ELISA和PCR的一致性不高。总之,寄生虫学技术在间日疟原虫慢性感染阶段鉴定受感染动物的能力较低。因此,应使用PCR和/或ELISA等技术来尽量减少假阴性的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of techniques for diagnosis of Trypanosoma vivax infections in naturally infected cattle in the Zona da Mata Mineira.

Evaluation of techniques for diagnosis of Trypanosoma vivax infections in naturally infected cattle in the Zona da Mata Mineira.

This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic techniques for trypanosomiasis, caused by Trypanosoma vivax, in naturally infected cattle in Minas Gerais, Zona da Mata. The deaths of six lactating cows with similar clinical conditions-characterized by hyporexia, hypogalactia, and recumbency-had been reported from one property. Initially, two animals were examined and diagnosed with trypanosomiasis through identification of the protozoan in a blood smear. After the initial diagnosis, all lactating cows (n=37) on the property were examined, and blood samples were collected for tests including whole blood smear, buffy coat smear, Woo's technique, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Woo's test, buffy coat smears, and whole blood smears indicated that 4/37 (10.81%) animals were positive for trypanosomiasis, whereas ELISA and PCR indicated that 33/37 (89.19%) and 27/37 (72.97%) animals, respectively, were positive. The agreement obtained between parasitological techniques was classified as high, while between ELISA and PCR, no agreement. In conclusion, parasitological techniques have a low capacity to identify infected animals in the chronic stage of T. vivax infection. Therefore, techniques such as PCR and/or ELISA should be used to minimize the occurrence of false negatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信