2018年至2021年赞比亚不合格和伪造医疗产品召回情况及对质量监测系统的影响。

The journal of medicine access Pub Date : 2022-12-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27550834221141767
Billy Chabalenge, Elimas Jere, Namuchindo Nanyangwe, Christabel Hikaambo, Steward Mudenda, Michelo Banda, Aubrey Kalungia, Scott Matafwali
{"title":"2018年至2021年赞比亚不合格和伪造医疗产品召回情况及对质量监测系统的影响。","authors":"Billy Chabalenge, Elimas Jere, Namuchindo Nanyangwe, Christabel Hikaambo, Steward Mudenda, Michelo Banda, Aubrey Kalungia, Scott Matafwali","doi":"10.1177/27550834221141767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substandard and falsified (SF) medical products are removed from circulation through a process called 'product recall' by medicines regulatory agencies. In Zambia, the Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority (ZAMRA) is responsible for recalling SF medical products from the Zambian market through passive and active surveillance methods. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of recalls of SF medical products and to analyse the frequently recalled therapeutic categories, dosage forms, categories of defects that led to the recalls and their sources with respect to the country of the marketing authorisation holder (MAH) or manufacturer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional review of the product recalls issued by ZAMRA between January 2018 and December 2021. A search for all medical product alerts and recalls issued by ZAMRA was carried out by reviewing the internal post-marketing surveillance database kept at ZAMRA headquarters. Data were extracted using a structured Excel database and analysed using Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 alerts were received during the review period, of which 83 (69.7%) were product recalls. Oral solid dosage forms were the most recalled dosage form (53%). Furthermore, the number of recalls increased in 2020 (44.6%) and 2021 (22.9%), with the majority (20.5%) of the recalled products being substandard products classified as antiseptics and disinfectants and were attributed to the high demand during the COVID-19 pandemic. Manufacturing laboratory control issues were the reason for product recall in almost half (47.4%) of the cases. Most of the products recalled originated from India (38.6%), followed by Zambia (25.3%). Only one suspected falsified product was recalled between 2018 and 2021. A total of 66 recalls of the 83 products were initiated by ZAMRA, with only 17 voluntarily by foreign MAHs. No product recall was initiated by the local representatives of foreign manufacturers or MAH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of the pharmaceutical product recalls in Zambia were substandard products. Manufacturing laboratory control issues lead to most recalls and require investigation of the root causes, preventive action, and strict compliance with the good manufacturing practices guidelines by manufacturers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75087,"journal":{"name":"The journal of medicine access","volume":"6 ","pages":"27550834221141767"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/86/10.1177_27550834221141767.PMC9806395.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substandard and falsified medical product recalls in Zambia from 2018 to 2021 and implications on the quality surveillance systems.\",\"authors\":\"Billy Chabalenge, Elimas Jere, Namuchindo Nanyangwe, Christabel Hikaambo, Steward Mudenda, Michelo Banda, Aubrey Kalungia, Scott Matafwali\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27550834221141767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substandard and falsified (SF) medical products are removed from circulation through a process called 'product recall' by medicines regulatory agencies. In Zambia, the Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority (ZAMRA) is responsible for recalling SF medical products from the Zambian market through passive and active surveillance methods. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of recalls of SF medical products and to analyse the frequently recalled therapeutic categories, dosage forms, categories of defects that led to the recalls and their sources with respect to the country of the marketing authorisation holder (MAH) or manufacturer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional review of the product recalls issued by ZAMRA between January 2018 and December 2021. A search for all medical product alerts and recalls issued by ZAMRA was carried out by reviewing the internal post-marketing surveillance database kept at ZAMRA headquarters. Data were extracted using a structured Excel database and analysed using Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 alerts were received during the review period, of which 83 (69.7%) were product recalls. Oral solid dosage forms were the most recalled dosage form (53%). Furthermore, the number of recalls increased in 2020 (44.6%) and 2021 (22.9%), with the majority (20.5%) of the recalled products being substandard products classified as antiseptics and disinfectants and were attributed to the high demand during the COVID-19 pandemic. Manufacturing laboratory control issues were the reason for product recall in almost half (47.4%) of the cases. Most of the products recalled originated from India (38.6%), followed by Zambia (25.3%). Only one suspected falsified product was recalled between 2018 and 2021. A total of 66 recalls of the 83 products were initiated by ZAMRA, with only 17 voluntarily by foreign MAHs. No product recall was initiated by the local representatives of foreign manufacturers or MAH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of the pharmaceutical product recalls in Zambia were substandard products. Manufacturing laboratory control issues lead to most recalls and require investigation of the root causes, preventive action, and strict compliance with the good manufacturing practices guidelines by manufacturers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of medicine access\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"27550834221141767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/86/10.1177_27550834221141767.PMC9806395.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of medicine access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27550834221141767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of medicine access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27550834221141767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药品监管机构通过 "产品召回 "程序将不合格和伪造(SF)医疗产品从流通市场中清除。在赞比亚,赞比亚药品监管局(ZAMRA)负责通过被动和主动监测方法从赞比亚市场上召回 SF 医疗产品。本研究旨在描述自费医疗产品召回的普遍程度,并分析经常召回的治疗类别、剂型、导致召回的缺陷类别及其与营销授权持有人(MAH)或制造商所在国有关的来源:我们对 ZAMRA 在 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间发布的产品召回进行了描述性横断面回顾。通过审查 ZAMRA 总部保存的内部上市后监督数据库,对 ZAMRA 发布的所有医疗产品警示和召回进行了搜索。使用结构化 Excel 数据库提取数据,并使用 Microsoft Excel 进行分析:结果:在审查期间共收到 119 份警报,其中 83 份(69.7%)为产品召回。召回最多的剂型是口服固体制剂(53%)。此外,召回数量在 2020 年(44.6%)和 2021 年(22.9%)有所增加,其中大部分(20.5%)召回产品为不合格产品,归类为抗菌剂和消毒剂,原因是 COVID-19 大流行期间需求量大。近一半(47.4%)的产品召回原因是生产实验室控制问题。大部分召回产品来自印度(38.6%),其次是赞比亚(25.3%)。在2018年至2021年期间,仅有一款疑似伪造产品被召回。在83种产品中,共有66种产品是由赞比亚医疗卫生机构主动召回的,只有17种产品是由外国医疗卫生机构自愿召回的。外国制造商或 MAH 的当地代表没有发起任何产品召回:赞比亚召回的大部分药品都是不合格产品。生产实验室控制问题导致了大多数召回,需要对根本原因进行调查,采取预防措施,并要求生产商严格遵守良好生产规范准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Substandard and falsified medical product recalls in Zambia from 2018 to 2021 and implications on the quality surveillance systems.

Substandard and falsified medical product recalls in Zambia from 2018 to 2021 and implications on the quality surveillance systems.

Substandard and falsified medical product recalls in Zambia from 2018 to 2021 and implications on the quality surveillance systems.

Substandard and falsified medical product recalls in Zambia from 2018 to 2021 and implications on the quality surveillance systems.

Background: Substandard and falsified (SF) medical products are removed from circulation through a process called 'product recall' by medicines regulatory agencies. In Zambia, the Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority (ZAMRA) is responsible for recalling SF medical products from the Zambian market through passive and active surveillance methods. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of recalls of SF medical products and to analyse the frequently recalled therapeutic categories, dosage forms, categories of defects that led to the recalls and their sources with respect to the country of the marketing authorisation holder (MAH) or manufacturer.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional review of the product recalls issued by ZAMRA between January 2018 and December 2021. A search for all medical product alerts and recalls issued by ZAMRA was carried out by reviewing the internal post-marketing surveillance database kept at ZAMRA headquarters. Data were extracted using a structured Excel database and analysed using Microsoft Excel.

Results: A total of 119 alerts were received during the review period, of which 83 (69.7%) were product recalls. Oral solid dosage forms were the most recalled dosage form (53%). Furthermore, the number of recalls increased in 2020 (44.6%) and 2021 (22.9%), with the majority (20.5%) of the recalled products being substandard products classified as antiseptics and disinfectants and were attributed to the high demand during the COVID-19 pandemic. Manufacturing laboratory control issues were the reason for product recall in almost half (47.4%) of the cases. Most of the products recalled originated from India (38.6%), followed by Zambia (25.3%). Only one suspected falsified product was recalled between 2018 and 2021. A total of 66 recalls of the 83 products were initiated by ZAMRA, with only 17 voluntarily by foreign MAHs. No product recall was initiated by the local representatives of foreign manufacturers or MAH.

Conclusion: The majority of the pharmaceutical product recalls in Zambia were substandard products. Manufacturing laboratory control issues lead to most recalls and require investigation of the root causes, preventive action, and strict compliance with the good manufacturing practices guidelines by manufacturers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信