利益相关者咨询委员会在严重精神疾病(SMI)研究中的有效参与:一项改善SMI和高血压患者依从性的临床试验的案例研究。

International journal of healthcare Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.5430/ijh.v8n2p9
Dafna Paltin, Jessica L Montoya, Celeste Weise, Carla Conroy, Ethan E Radatz, Kurt C Strange, David J Moore, Martha Sajatovic, Jennifer B Levin
{"title":"利益相关者咨询委员会在严重精神疾病(SMI)研究中的有效参与:一项改善SMI和高血压患者依从性的临床试验的案例研究。","authors":"Dafna Paltin,&nbsp;Jessica L Montoya,&nbsp;Celeste Weise,&nbsp;Carla Conroy,&nbsp;Ethan E Radatz,&nbsp;Kurt C Strange,&nbsp;David J Moore,&nbsp;Martha Sajatovic,&nbsp;Jennifer B Levin","doi":"10.5430/ijh.v8n2p9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poor adherence to antihypertensive medication occurs in 50-80% of patients. An ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) is evaluating a personalized mobile-health intervention in poorly adherent hypertensive persons with bipolar disorder. To enhance efficacy, the ongoing trial elicited guidance from a Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) comprised of patients, family members, clinicians, and health system administrators. Our goal is to describe the formation, role, decision-making process, and key contributions of the SAB as a means of demonstrating meaningful community engagement in mental health research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using models and measures from the field of implementation science, eleven SAB members convened across three meetings followed by quantitative surveys that assessed SAB member satisfaction and engagement during the meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant suggestions from the SAB included 1) expanding inclusion/exclusion criteria, and 2) operationalizing remote implementation of the RCT. Primary study implementation challenges identified by the SAB were 1) participant difficulty engaging in the mHealth intervention, and 2) identification of procedures for monitoring participant adherence to the RCT protocol and contacting under-engaged participants. Quantitative surveys indicated that all SAB members believed that the objectives of the meetings were clear, perceived that they were able to participate in the discussions, and that they were heard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing evidence demonstrates the feasibility of engaging with SABs in clinical research and that this process improves intervention design, increases participant engagement, reduces mental health-related stigma, and produces more effective implementation strategies. We encourage future investigators to use an implementation science framework in partnership with SABs to refine their proposed interventions and improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73454,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective engagement of a stakeholder advisory board in severe mental illness (SMI) research: A case study of a clinical trial to improve adherence among people with SMI and hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Dafna Paltin,&nbsp;Jessica L Montoya,&nbsp;Celeste Weise,&nbsp;Carla Conroy,&nbsp;Ethan E Radatz,&nbsp;Kurt C Strange,&nbsp;David J Moore,&nbsp;Martha Sajatovic,&nbsp;Jennifer B Levin\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/ijh.v8n2p9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poor adherence to antihypertensive medication occurs in 50-80% of patients. An ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) is evaluating a personalized mobile-health intervention in poorly adherent hypertensive persons with bipolar disorder. To enhance efficacy, the ongoing trial elicited guidance from a Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) comprised of patients, family members, clinicians, and health system administrators. Our goal is to describe the formation, role, decision-making process, and key contributions of the SAB as a means of demonstrating meaningful community engagement in mental health research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using models and measures from the field of implementation science, eleven SAB members convened across three meetings followed by quantitative surveys that assessed SAB member satisfaction and engagement during the meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant suggestions from the SAB included 1) expanding inclusion/exclusion criteria, and 2) operationalizing remote implementation of the RCT. Primary study implementation challenges identified by the SAB were 1) participant difficulty engaging in the mHealth intervention, and 2) identification of procedures for monitoring participant adherence to the RCT protocol and contacting under-engaged participants. Quantitative surveys indicated that all SAB members believed that the objectives of the meetings were clear, perceived that they were able to participate in the discussions, and that they were heard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing evidence demonstrates the feasibility of engaging with SABs in clinical research and that this process improves intervention design, increases participant engagement, reduces mental health-related stigma, and produces more effective implementation strategies. We encourage future investigators to use an implementation science framework in partnership with SABs to refine their proposed interventions and improve clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v8n2p9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v8n2p9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:50-80%的患者对降压药物依从性差。一项正在进行的随机对照试验(RCT)正在评估对患有双相情感障碍的顽固性高血压患者的个性化移动健康干预。为了提高疗效,正在进行的试验得到了由患者、家庭成员、临床医生和卫生系统管理人员组成的利益相关者咨询委员会(SAB)的指导。我们的目标是描述SAB的形成、作用、决策过程和关键贡献,以此来证明社区参与心理健康研究的意义。方法:使用实施科学领域的模型和措施,11名SAB成员召开了三次会议,随后进行了定量调查,评估了SAB成员在会议期间的满意度和参与度。结果:SAB的重要建议包括1)扩大纳入/排除标准,以及2)远程实施RCT。SAB确定的主要研究实施挑战是1)参与者难以参与mHealth干预,以及2)确定监测参与者遵守随机对照试验方案和联系参与不足参与者的程序。定量调查显示,南非广播公司的所有成员都认为会议的目标是明确的,认为他们能够参与讨论,并且他们被倾听了。结论:越来越多的证据表明,在临床研究中使用SAB是可行的,这一过程改进了干预设计,增加了参与者的参与度,减少了与心理健康相关的污名,并产生了更有效的实施策略。我们鼓励未来的研究人员与SAB合作,使用实施科学框架来完善他们提出的干预措施并改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective engagement of a stakeholder advisory board in severe mental illness (SMI) research: A case study of a clinical trial to improve adherence among people with SMI and hypertension.

Objective: Poor adherence to antihypertensive medication occurs in 50-80% of patients. An ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) is evaluating a personalized mobile-health intervention in poorly adherent hypertensive persons with bipolar disorder. To enhance efficacy, the ongoing trial elicited guidance from a Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) comprised of patients, family members, clinicians, and health system administrators. Our goal is to describe the formation, role, decision-making process, and key contributions of the SAB as a means of demonstrating meaningful community engagement in mental health research.

Methods: Using models and measures from the field of implementation science, eleven SAB members convened across three meetings followed by quantitative surveys that assessed SAB member satisfaction and engagement during the meeting.

Results: Significant suggestions from the SAB included 1) expanding inclusion/exclusion criteria, and 2) operationalizing remote implementation of the RCT. Primary study implementation challenges identified by the SAB were 1) participant difficulty engaging in the mHealth intervention, and 2) identification of procedures for monitoring participant adherence to the RCT protocol and contacting under-engaged participants. Quantitative surveys indicated that all SAB members believed that the objectives of the meetings were clear, perceived that they were able to participate in the discussions, and that they were heard.

Conclusions: Increasing evidence demonstrates the feasibility of engaging with SABs in clinical research and that this process improves intervention design, increases participant engagement, reduces mental health-related stigma, and produces more effective implementation strategies. We encourage future investigators to use an implementation science framework in partnership with SABs to refine their proposed interventions and improve clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信