新型无针注射系统对麻醉过程中疼痛感知和牙科焦虑的影响:随机对照口裂研究。

Melek Belevcikli, Halenur Altan, Osman Demir
{"title":"新型无针注射系统对麻醉过程中疼痛感知和牙科焦虑的影响:随机对照口裂研究。","authors":"Melek Belevcikli,&nbsp;Halenur Altan,&nbsp;Osman Demir","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Pain management is one of the most important factors affecting the success of pediatric dentistry. Therefore, new needle- and pain-free local anesthesia techniques have been developed in parallel with technological advancements. The purpose of this study is to compare the pain perception and dental anxiety levels associated with a needle-free injection system (Comfort-in™) and the classic needle method during treatment-required infiltration anesthesia in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled crossover split-mouth clinical study included 94 children who required dental treatment with local anesthesia using a dental needle or needle-free injection system for the bilateral primary molars. The Wong-Baker Scale (WBS) was used to measure pain perception at different times, and the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS) was used to measure the anxiety level of the child. A statistical software package was used to process the data. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the needle-free injection system and dental needle method during the induction stage for filling and pulpotomy (P > 0.05). \"Pain on postoperative 1st day\" was similar in both types of anesthesia (P = 0.750).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The needle-free injection system was as effective as the dental needle method. The Comfort-in™ system was an acceptable alternative for patients during the postoperative period. Understanding how pain management may be provided during local anesthesia administration and a child's fear and anxiety regarding the dentist may lead to better dental compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/4c/jdapm-23-1.PMC9911968.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study.\",\"authors\":\"Melek Belevcikli,&nbsp;Halenur Altan,&nbsp;Osman Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Pain management is one of the most important factors affecting the success of pediatric dentistry. Therefore, new needle- and pain-free local anesthesia techniques have been developed in parallel with technological advancements. The purpose of this study is to compare the pain perception and dental anxiety levels associated with a needle-free injection system (Comfort-in™) and the classic needle method during treatment-required infiltration anesthesia in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled crossover split-mouth clinical study included 94 children who required dental treatment with local anesthesia using a dental needle or needle-free injection system for the bilateral primary molars. The Wong-Baker Scale (WBS) was used to measure pain perception at different times, and the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS) was used to measure the anxiety level of the child. A statistical software package was used to process the data. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the needle-free injection system and dental needle method during the induction stage for filling and pulpotomy (P > 0.05). \\\"Pain on postoperative 1st day\\\" was similar in both types of anesthesia (P = 0.750).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The needle-free injection system was as effective as the dental needle method. The Comfort-in™ system was an acceptable alternative for patients during the postoperative period. Understanding how pain management may be provided during local anesthesia administration and a child's fear and anxiety regarding the dentist may lead to better dental compliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/4c/jdapm-23-1.PMC9911968.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛管理是影响儿童牙科成功的最重要因素之一。因此,新的无针无痛局部麻醉技术随着技术的进步而发展。本研究的目的是比较无针注射系统(Comfort-in™)和经典针法在儿童治疗所需浸润麻醉期间的疼痛感知和牙科焦虑水平。方法:本研究纳入94例患儿,采用牙针或无针注射系统局部麻醉治疗双侧第一磨牙。采用Wong-Baker量表(WBS)和改良儿童牙科焦虑量表(MCDAS)分别测量患儿在不同时间的疼痛感受和焦虑程度。采用统计软件包对数据进行处理。差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结果:无针注射系统与牙针法在充填和截髓诱导阶段差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两种麻醉方式术后第1天的“疼痛”相似(P = 0.750)。结论:无针注射系统与牙针法注射效果相同。Comfort-in™系统是术后患者可接受的替代方案。了解如何在局部麻醉期间提供疼痛管理以及儿童对牙医的恐惧和焦虑可能会导致更好的牙科依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study.

Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study.

Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study.

Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study.

Backgrounds: Pain management is one of the most important factors affecting the success of pediatric dentistry. Therefore, new needle- and pain-free local anesthesia techniques have been developed in parallel with technological advancements. The purpose of this study is to compare the pain perception and dental anxiety levels associated with a needle-free injection system (Comfort-in™) and the classic needle method during treatment-required infiltration anesthesia in children.

Methods: This randomized controlled crossover split-mouth clinical study included 94 children who required dental treatment with local anesthesia using a dental needle or needle-free injection system for the bilateral primary molars. The Wong-Baker Scale (WBS) was used to measure pain perception at different times, and the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS) was used to measure the anxiety level of the child. A statistical software package was used to process the data. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: There was no significant difference between the needle-free injection system and dental needle method during the induction stage for filling and pulpotomy (P > 0.05). "Pain on postoperative 1st day" was similar in both types of anesthesia (P = 0.750).

Conclusions: The needle-free injection system was as effective as the dental needle method. The Comfort-in™ system was an acceptable alternative for patients during the postoperative period. Understanding how pain management may be provided during local anesthesia administration and a child's fear and anxiety regarding the dentist may lead to better dental compliance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信