影响临床与社区服务机构合作的因素。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Michaela J Kerrissey, Sara J Singer
{"title":"影响临床与社区服务机构合作的因素。","authors":"Michaela J Kerrissey,&nbsp;Sara J Singer","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaboration between clinical and community-based social service organizations is increasingly seen as vital for preventing and managing chronic diseases but has been challenging to establish and sustain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify organizational barriers and facilitators for clinic-community collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We employed multiple methods to study a national sample of nonprofit community-based organizations that each collaborated with local clinical organizations for diabetes prevention in the United States. We used qualitative data collected longitudinally through 65 semistructured interviews from 2016 to 2017 at seven of these organizations and their clinical collaborators to understand their relationships. We employed survey data ( N = 247 with 73% response rate) to measure and explore relationships among qualitatively identified themes and collaboration performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We documented three levels of organizational challenges to community-clinic collaboration. Interorganizational challenges pertain to facing only weakly aligned interests across organizations. Interpersonal challenges pertain to misperceptions and miscommunications that occur as frontline employees from differing organizations seek to work together. Task-related challenges pertain to the inadequacy of current processes to effectively link services across clinical and community settings. We found that bridging leadership , provisional teamwork, and learning processes helped to overcome these challenges by enabling iterative progress. Follow-up national survey results indicated that these facilitators were significantly associated with collaboration performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because community-clinic collaboration presents substantial interorganizational, interpersonal, and task-related challenges, financial incentives alone are likely insufficient for success.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Resources that help develop capacity to work across community and clinical settings may be vital and warrant dedicated funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting collaboration between clinical and community service organizations.\",\"authors\":\"Michaela J Kerrissey,&nbsp;Sara J Singer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaboration between clinical and community-based social service organizations is increasingly seen as vital for preventing and managing chronic diseases but has been challenging to establish and sustain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify organizational barriers and facilitators for clinic-community collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We employed multiple methods to study a national sample of nonprofit community-based organizations that each collaborated with local clinical organizations for diabetes prevention in the United States. We used qualitative data collected longitudinally through 65 semistructured interviews from 2016 to 2017 at seven of these organizations and their clinical collaborators to understand their relationships. We employed survey data ( N = 247 with 73% response rate) to measure and explore relationships among qualitatively identified themes and collaboration performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We documented three levels of organizational challenges to community-clinic collaboration. Interorganizational challenges pertain to facing only weakly aligned interests across organizations. Interpersonal challenges pertain to misperceptions and miscommunications that occur as frontline employees from differing organizations seek to work together. Task-related challenges pertain to the inadequacy of current processes to effectively link services across clinical and community settings. We found that bridging leadership , provisional teamwork, and learning processes helped to overcome these challenges by enabling iterative progress. Follow-up national survey results indicated that these facilitators were significantly associated with collaboration performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because community-clinic collaboration presents substantial interorganizational, interpersonal, and task-related challenges, financial incentives alone are likely insufficient for success.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Resources that help develop capacity to work across community and clinical settings may be vital and warrant dedicated funding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000359\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:临床和社区社会服务组织之间的合作日益被视为预防和管理慢性病的关键,但建立和维持合作一直具有挑战性。目的:本研究的目的是找出临床-社区合作的组织障碍和促进因素。方法/方法:我们采用多种方法研究非营利性社区组织的全国样本,每个组织都与美国当地的糖尿病预防临床组织合作。我们使用了2016年至2017年在其中7个组织及其临床合作者中通过65次半结构化访谈纵向收集的定性数据,以了解它们之间的关系。我们采用调查数据(N = 247,回复率73%)来衡量和探索定性确定的主题与协作绩效之间的关系。结果:我们记录了社区诊所合作的三个层次的组织挑战。跨组织的挑战只涉及到跨组织的弱一致的利益。人际关系挑战是指来自不同组织的一线员工在寻求合作时产生的误解和沟通不端。与任务相关的挑战是,目前的流程不足以有效地将临床和社区环境中的服务联系起来。我们发现桥梁式的领导,临时的团队合作,以及学习过程通过实现迭代的进展来帮助克服这些挑战。后续的全国调查结果表明,这些促进因素与合作绩效显著相关。结论:由于社区诊所合作存在大量的组织间、人际关系和任务相关的挑战,仅靠经济激励可能不足以成功。实践意义:帮助发展跨社区和临床环境工作能力的资源可能是至关重要的,需要专门的资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting collaboration between clinical and community service organizations.

Background: Collaboration between clinical and community-based social service organizations is increasingly seen as vital for preventing and managing chronic diseases but has been challenging to establish and sustain.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify organizational barriers and facilitators for clinic-community collaboration.

Methodology/approach: We employed multiple methods to study a national sample of nonprofit community-based organizations that each collaborated with local clinical organizations for diabetes prevention in the United States. We used qualitative data collected longitudinally through 65 semistructured interviews from 2016 to 2017 at seven of these organizations and their clinical collaborators to understand their relationships. We employed survey data ( N = 247 with 73% response rate) to measure and explore relationships among qualitatively identified themes and collaboration performance.

Results: We documented three levels of organizational challenges to community-clinic collaboration. Interorganizational challenges pertain to facing only weakly aligned interests across organizations. Interpersonal challenges pertain to misperceptions and miscommunications that occur as frontline employees from differing organizations seek to work together. Task-related challenges pertain to the inadequacy of current processes to effectively link services across clinical and community settings. We found that bridging leadership , provisional teamwork, and learning processes helped to overcome these challenges by enabling iterative progress. Follow-up national survey results indicated that these facilitators were significantly associated with collaboration performance.

Conclusions: Because community-clinic collaboration presents substantial interorganizational, interpersonal, and task-related challenges, financial incentives alone are likely insufficient for success.

Practice implications: Resources that help develop capacity to work across community and clinical settings may be vital and warrant dedicated funding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信