{"title":"髋臼移位骨折复位后临时外固定能否预防创伤后异位骨化?","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To recommend appropriate immobilization after the initial reduction of acetabular displaced fractures in order to minimize the risk of heterotopic ossification formation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study of patients treated in our surgical department during the years 2005-2018.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>There were 94 patients included in statistical analysis. The factors of injury severity, course of surgery and hospitalization and incidence of complications were recorded. The functional and X-ray results were evaluated at least one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were divided into the two groups according to the type of fixation after closed reduction, the external fixation (EF) and the skeletal traction (ST) group. According to the type of fracture there were 33 patients with central displacement and 61 patients with posterior displacement. Ossification grade III. And IV. Occur in 20% of our sample. There was greater incidence of Brooker grade III. And IV. Ossification in the ST group, but statistically insignificant, p = 0.57. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of ossifications regarding the severity of the head injury, p = 0.11, or to the severity of the injury p = 0.54. The combination of posterior displacement and ST results in higher risk for ossifications, specifically in our group at 11.48% compared to the combination of posterior displacement and EF where it is 8.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Skeletal traction for posterior displaced acetabular fracture appears to be a more risky procedure for the development of ossifications than external fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19098,"journal":{"name":"Neuro endocrinology letters","volume":"43 6","pages":"308-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could temporary external fixation after reduction of displaced acetabular fractures prevent posttraumatic heterotopic ossification?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To recommend appropriate immobilization after the initial reduction of acetabular displaced fractures in order to minimize the risk of heterotopic ossification formation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study of patients treated in our surgical department during the years 2005-2018.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>There were 94 patients included in statistical analysis. The factors of injury severity, course of surgery and hospitalization and incidence of complications were recorded. The functional and X-ray results were evaluated at least one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were divided into the two groups according to the type of fixation after closed reduction, the external fixation (EF) and the skeletal traction (ST) group. According to the type of fracture there were 33 patients with central displacement and 61 patients with posterior displacement. Ossification grade III. And IV. Occur in 20% of our sample. There was greater incidence of Brooker grade III. And IV. Ossification in the ST group, but statistically insignificant, p = 0.57. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of ossifications regarding the severity of the head injury, p = 0.11, or to the severity of the injury p = 0.54. The combination of posterior displacement and ST results in higher risk for ossifications, specifically in our group at 11.48% compared to the combination of posterior displacement and EF where it is 8.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Skeletal traction for posterior displaced acetabular fracture appears to be a more risky procedure for the development of ossifications than external fixation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"308-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro endocrinology letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Could temporary external fixation after reduction of displaced acetabular fractures prevent posttraumatic heterotopic ossification?
Objectives: To recommend appropriate immobilization after the initial reduction of acetabular displaced fractures in order to minimize the risk of heterotopic ossification formation.
Design: Retrospective study of patients treated in our surgical department during the years 2005-2018.
Materials and methods: There were 94 patients included in statistical analysis. The factors of injury severity, course of surgery and hospitalization and incidence of complications were recorded. The functional and X-ray results were evaluated at least one year after surgery.
Results: The patients were divided into the two groups according to the type of fixation after closed reduction, the external fixation (EF) and the skeletal traction (ST) group. According to the type of fracture there were 33 patients with central displacement and 61 patients with posterior displacement. Ossification grade III. And IV. Occur in 20% of our sample. There was greater incidence of Brooker grade III. And IV. Ossification in the ST group, but statistically insignificant, p = 0.57. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of ossifications regarding the severity of the head injury, p = 0.11, or to the severity of the injury p = 0.54. The combination of posterior displacement and ST results in higher risk for ossifications, specifically in our group at 11.48% compared to the combination of posterior displacement and EF where it is 8.2%.
Conclusion: Skeletal traction for posterior displaced acetabular fracture appears to be a more risky procedure for the development of ossifications than external fixation.
期刊介绍:
Neuroendocrinology Letters is an international, peer-reviewed interdisciplinary journal covering the fields of Neuroendocrinology, Neuroscience, Neurophysiology, Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychoneuroimmunology, Reproductive Medicine, Chronobiology, Human Ethology and related fields for RAPID publication of Original Papers, Review Articles, State-of-the-art, Clinical Reports and other contributions from all the fields covered by Neuroendocrinology
Letters.
Papers from both basic research (methodology, molecular and cellular biology, anatomy, histology, biology, embryology, teratology, normal and pathological physiology, biophysics, pharmacology, pathology and experimental pathology, biochemistry, neurochemistry, enzymology, chronobiology, receptor studies, endocrinology, immunology and neuroimmunology, animal physiology, animal breeding and ethology, human ethology, psychology and others) and from clinical research (neurology, psychiatry and child psychiatry, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, endocrinology, immunology, cardiovascular studies, internal medicine, oncology and others) will be considered.
The Journal publishes Original papers and Review Articles. Brief reports, Special Communications, proved they are based on adequate experimental evidence, Clinical Studies, Case Reports, Commentaries, Discussions, Letters to the Editor (correspondence column), Book Reviews, Congress Reports and other categories of articles (philosophy, art, social issues, medical and health policies, biomedical history, etc.) will be taken under consideration.