IONM的误解第三部分:刺激重复率对术中体感觉诱发电位振幅和潜伏期的影响。

Q3 Health Professions
David W Allison, Justin W Silverstein, Shanti S Thirumalai, Randy S D'Amico
{"title":"IONM的误解第三部分:刺激重复率对术中体感觉诱发电位振幅和潜伏期的影响。","authors":"David W Allison,&nbsp;Justin W Silverstein,&nbsp;Shanti S Thirumalai,&nbsp;Randy S D'Amico","doi":"10.1080/21646821.2022.2141553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rate at which stimulation is applied to peripheral nerves is critical to generating high-quality intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in a timely manner. Guidelines based on a limited study and anecdotal evidence present differing, incorrect, or incomplete stimulation rate recommendations. We examined the effect stimulating the ulnar and tibial nerves at 1.05, 2.79, 5.69, and 8.44 Hz had on cortical, subcortical, and peripheral response amplitude and latency in 10 subjects with neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and 10 without NMB in the operating room under general anesthesia. As the stimulation repetition rate increased, the amplitude of upper and lower extremity cortical responses decreased equally in both groups. The ulnar nerve N20 cortical response amplitude decreased 27.9% at 2.79 Hz, 48.8% at 5.69 Hz, and 53.8% at 8.44 Hz. The tibial nerve P37 cortical response amplitude decreased 30.3% at 2.79 Hz, 53.8% at 5.69 Hz, and 56.8% at 8.44 Hz. Neither upper or lower extremity peripheral or subcortical amplitudes nor upper and lower extremity subcortical or peripheral latencies were affected by increasing repetition rate in either group. Low SSEP stimulation repetition rates ensure the highest quality cortical responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":22816,"journal":{"name":"The Neurodiagnostic Journal","volume":"62 4","pages":"239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misconceptions in IONM Part III: Stimulation Repetition Rate Effects on Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude and Latency.\",\"authors\":\"David W Allison,&nbsp;Justin W Silverstein,&nbsp;Shanti S Thirumalai,&nbsp;Randy S D'Amico\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21646821.2022.2141553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rate at which stimulation is applied to peripheral nerves is critical to generating high-quality intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in a timely manner. Guidelines based on a limited study and anecdotal evidence present differing, incorrect, or incomplete stimulation rate recommendations. We examined the effect stimulating the ulnar and tibial nerves at 1.05, 2.79, 5.69, and 8.44 Hz had on cortical, subcortical, and peripheral response amplitude and latency in 10 subjects with neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and 10 without NMB in the operating room under general anesthesia. As the stimulation repetition rate increased, the amplitude of upper and lower extremity cortical responses decreased equally in both groups. The ulnar nerve N20 cortical response amplitude decreased 27.9% at 2.79 Hz, 48.8% at 5.69 Hz, and 53.8% at 8.44 Hz. The tibial nerve P37 cortical response amplitude decreased 30.3% at 2.79 Hz, 53.8% at 5.69 Hz, and 56.8% at 8.44 Hz. Neither upper or lower extremity peripheral or subcortical amplitudes nor upper and lower extremity subcortical or peripheral latencies were affected by increasing repetition rate in either group. Low SSEP stimulation repetition rates ensure the highest quality cortical responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Neurodiagnostic Journal\",\"volume\":\"62 4\",\"pages\":\"239-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Neurodiagnostic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21646821.2022.2141553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neurodiagnostic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21646821.2022.2141553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对周围神经施加刺激的速度对于及时产生高质量的术中体感诱发电位(ssep)至关重要。基于有限研究和轶事证据的指南提出了不同的、不正确的或不完整的刺激率建议。我们观察了在手术中,以1.05、2.79、5.69和8.44 Hz刺激尺神经和胫骨神经对10例神经肌肉阻断(NMB)和10例非NMB患者的皮层、皮层下和外周反应振幅和潜伏期的影响。随着刺激重复频率的增加,两组的上肢和下肢皮质反应幅度均下降。在2.79 Hz、5.69 Hz和8.44 Hz下,尺神经N20皮层反应幅度分别下降27.9%、48.8%和53.8%。在2.79 Hz、5.69 Hz和8.44 Hz下,胫神经P37皮质反应幅度分别下降30.3%、53.8%和56.8%。两组重复频率的增加均不影响上肢或下肢外周或皮层下的振幅,也不影响上肢和下肢皮层下或外周的潜伏期。低SSEP刺激重复率确保了最高质量的皮层反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misconceptions in IONM Part III: Stimulation Repetition Rate Effects on Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude and Latency.

The rate at which stimulation is applied to peripheral nerves is critical to generating high-quality intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in a timely manner. Guidelines based on a limited study and anecdotal evidence present differing, incorrect, or incomplete stimulation rate recommendations. We examined the effect stimulating the ulnar and tibial nerves at 1.05, 2.79, 5.69, and 8.44 Hz had on cortical, subcortical, and peripheral response amplitude and latency in 10 subjects with neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and 10 without NMB in the operating room under general anesthesia. As the stimulation repetition rate increased, the amplitude of upper and lower extremity cortical responses decreased equally in both groups. The ulnar nerve N20 cortical response amplitude decreased 27.9% at 2.79 Hz, 48.8% at 5.69 Hz, and 53.8% at 8.44 Hz. The tibial nerve P37 cortical response amplitude decreased 30.3% at 2.79 Hz, 53.8% at 5.69 Hz, and 56.8% at 8.44 Hz. Neither upper or lower extremity peripheral or subcortical amplitudes nor upper and lower extremity subcortical or peripheral latencies were affected by increasing repetition rate in either group. Low SSEP stimulation repetition rates ensure the highest quality cortical responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Neurodiagnostic Journal
The Neurodiagnostic Journal Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Neurodiagnostic Journal is the official journal of ASET - The Neurodiagnostic Society. It serves as an educational resource for Neurodiagnostic professionals, a vehicle for introducing new techniques and innovative technologies in the field, patient safety and advocacy, and an avenue for sharing best practices within the Neurodiagnostic Technology profession. The journal features original articles about electroencephalography (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), nerve conduction (NC), polysomnography (PSG), autonomic testing, and long-term monitoring (LTM) in the intensive care (ICU) and epilepsy monitoring units (EMU). Subject matter also includes education, training, lab management, legislative and licensure needs, guidelines for standards of care, and the impact of our profession in healthcare and society. The journal seeks to foster ideas, commentary, and news from technologists, physicians, clinicians, managers/leaders, and professional organizations, and to introduce trends and the latest developments in the field of neurodiagnostics. Media reviews, case studies, ASET Annual Conference proceedings, review articles, and quizzes for ASET-CEUs are also published in The Neurodiagnostic Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信