改进了全基因组基因-环境相互作用的两步检测

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Eric S. Kawaguchi, Andre E. Kim, Juan Pablo Lewinger, W. James Gauderman
{"title":"改进了全基因组基因-环境相互作用的两步检测","authors":"Eric S. Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Andre E. Kim,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Lewinger,&nbsp;W. James Gauderman","doi":"10.1002/gepi.22509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two-step tests for gene–environment (<math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>×</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $G\\times E$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) interactions exploit marginal single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects to improve the power of a genome-wide interaction scan. They combine a screening step based on marginal effects used to “bin” SNPs for weighted hypothesis testing in the second step to deliver greater power over single-step tests while preserving the genome-wide Type I error. However, the presence of many SNPs with detectable marginal effects on the trait of interest can reduce power by “displacing” true interactions with weaker marginal effects and by adding to the number of tests that need to be corrected for multiple testing. We introduce a new significance-based allocation into bins for Step-2 <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>×</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $G\\times E$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> testing that overcomes the displacement issue and propose a computationally efficient approach to account for multiple testing within bins. Simulation results demonstrate that these simple improvements can provide substantially greater power than current methods under several scenarios. An application to a multistudy collaboration for understanding colorectal cancer reveals a <i>G</i> × Sex interaction located near the SMAD7 gene.</p>","PeriodicalId":12710,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Epidemiology","volume":"47 2","pages":"152-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gepi.22509","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved two-step testing of genome-wide gene–environment interactions\",\"authors\":\"Eric S. Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Andre E. Kim,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Lewinger,&nbsp;W. James Gauderman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gepi.22509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two-step tests for gene–environment (<math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>G</mi>\\n \\n <mo>×</mo>\\n \\n <mi>E</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $G\\\\times E$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) interactions exploit marginal single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects to improve the power of a genome-wide interaction scan. They combine a screening step based on marginal effects used to “bin” SNPs for weighted hypothesis testing in the second step to deliver greater power over single-step tests while preserving the genome-wide Type I error. However, the presence of many SNPs with detectable marginal effects on the trait of interest can reduce power by “displacing” true interactions with weaker marginal effects and by adding to the number of tests that need to be corrected for multiple testing. We introduce a new significance-based allocation into bins for Step-2 <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>G</mi>\\n \\n <mo>×</mo>\\n \\n <mi>E</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $G\\\\times E$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> testing that overcomes the displacement issue and propose a computationally efficient approach to account for multiple testing within bins. Simulation results demonstrate that these simple improvements can provide substantially greater power than current methods under several scenarios. An application to a multistudy collaboration for understanding colorectal cancer reveals a <i>G</i> × Sex interaction located near the SMAD7 gene.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetic Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"152-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gepi.22509\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetic Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.22509\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.22509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基因-环境(G × E$ G\乘以E$)相互作用的两步测试利用边际单核苷酸多态性(SNP)效应来提高全基因组相互作用扫描的能力。他们在第二步中结合了基于边际效应的筛选步骤,用于“bin”snp加权假设检验,以提供比单步检验更大的能力,同时保留全基因组I型误差。然而,许多snp的存在对感兴趣的性状具有可检测到的边际效应,可以通过用较弱的边际效应"取代"真正的相互作用,以及通过增加需要为多次测试纠正的测试数量,从而降低功率。我们在步骤2 G × E$ G\ × E$测试中引入了一种新的基于显著性的分配方法,克服了位移问题,并提出了一种计算效率高的方法来解释箱内的多个测试。仿真结果表明,在几种情况下,这些简单的改进可以提供比当前方法更大的功率。一项用于了解结直肠癌的多研究合作应用揭示了位于SMAD7基因附近的G × Sex相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improved two-step testing of genome-wide gene–environment interactions

Improved two-step testing of genome-wide gene–environment interactions

Two-step tests for gene–environment ( G × E $G\times E$ ) interactions exploit marginal single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects to improve the power of a genome-wide interaction scan. They combine a screening step based on marginal effects used to “bin” SNPs for weighted hypothesis testing in the second step to deliver greater power over single-step tests while preserving the genome-wide Type I error. However, the presence of many SNPs with detectable marginal effects on the trait of interest can reduce power by “displacing” true interactions with weaker marginal effects and by adding to the number of tests that need to be corrected for multiple testing. We introduce a new significance-based allocation into bins for Step-2 G × E $G\times E$ testing that overcomes the displacement issue and propose a computationally efficient approach to account for multiple testing within bins. Simulation results demonstrate that these simple improvements can provide substantially greater power than current methods under several scenarios. An application to a multistudy collaboration for understanding colorectal cancer reveals a G × Sex interaction located near the SMAD7 gene.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetic Epidemiology
Genetic Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetic Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed journal for discussion of research on the genetic causes of the distribution of human traits in families and populations. Emphasis is placed on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to human disease as revealed by genetic, epidemiological, and biologic investigations. Genetic Epidemiology primarily publishes papers in statistical genetics, a research field that is primarily concerned with development of statistical, bioinformatical, and computational models for analyzing genetic data. Incorporation of underlying biology and population genetics into conceptual models is favored. The Journal seeks original articles comprising either applied research or innovative statistical, mathematical, computational, or genomic methodologies that advance studies in genetic epidemiology. Other types of reports are encouraged, such as letters to the editor, topic reviews, and perspectives from other fields of research that will likely enrich the field of genetic epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信