肺鳞状细胞癌活检的细胞分离分级提供了所有分期的预后信息,并且与切除标本分级一致

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Moritz Jesinghaus, Melanie Boxberg, Maxime Schmitt, Mark Kriegsmann, Alexander Harms, Corinna Lang, Thomas Muley, Hauke Winter, Katharina Kriegsmann, Arne Warth, Albrecht Stenzinger, Carsten Denkert, Hans Hoffmann, Seyer Safi, Wilko Weichert
{"title":"肺鳞状细胞癌活检的细胞分离分级提供了所有分期的预后信息,并且与切除标本分级一致","authors":"Moritz Jesinghaus,&nbsp;Melanie Boxberg,&nbsp;Maxime Schmitt,&nbsp;Mark Kriegsmann,&nbsp;Alexander Harms,&nbsp;Corinna Lang,&nbsp;Thomas Muley,&nbsp;Hauke Winter,&nbsp;Katharina Kriegsmann,&nbsp;Arne Warth,&nbsp;Albrecht Stenzinger,&nbsp;Carsten Denkert,&nbsp;Hans Hoffmann,&nbsp;Seyer Safi,&nbsp;Wilko Weichert","doi":"10.1002/cjp2.295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grading of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) based on tumour budding and cell nest size has been termed cellular dissociation grading (CDG) and was suggested as a robust outcome predictor when assessed in biopsies and resections of various extrapulmonary SCCs. In pulmonary SCC (pSCC), this has so far been shown only for resected cancers. As most lung cancers are inoperable, it is of utmost importance to clarify whether the prognostic impact of CDG is retained in the biopsy setting. Two independent pSCC biopsy cohorts from Munich (<i>n</i> = 134, non-resected) and Heidelberg (<i>n</i> = 135, resected) were assessed. Tumour budding and cell nest size measures were assembled into the three-tiered CDG system (G1–G3). Data were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and overall- (OS), disease-specific- (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Interobserver variability and concordance between biopsy and resection specimen were also investigated. CDG was highly congruent between biopsy and resection specimens (<i>κ</i> = 0.77, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In both pSCC cohorts, biopsy-derived CDG strongly impacted on OS, DSS, and DFS (e.g. DFS: <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In multivariate survival analyses, CDG remained a stage independent predictor of survival in both cohorts (DFS: <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 respectively; hazard ratio Munich cohort: CDG-G2: 4.31, CDG-G3; 5.14; Heidelberg cohort: CDG-G2: 5.87, CDG-G3: 9.07). Interobserver agreement for CDG was almost perfect (<i>κ</i> = 0.84, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). We conclude that assessment of CDG based on tumour budding and cell nest size is feasible on pSCC biopsies and harbours stage independent prognostic information in resectable as well as non-resectable pSCC. Integration of this grading approach into clinicopathological routine should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/51/CJP2-8-567.PMC9535098.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cellular dissociation grading on biopsies of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma provides prognostic information across all stages and is congruent with resection specimen grading\",\"authors\":\"Moritz Jesinghaus,&nbsp;Melanie Boxberg,&nbsp;Maxime Schmitt,&nbsp;Mark Kriegsmann,&nbsp;Alexander Harms,&nbsp;Corinna Lang,&nbsp;Thomas Muley,&nbsp;Hauke Winter,&nbsp;Katharina Kriegsmann,&nbsp;Arne Warth,&nbsp;Albrecht Stenzinger,&nbsp;Carsten Denkert,&nbsp;Hans Hoffmann,&nbsp;Seyer Safi,&nbsp;Wilko Weichert\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjp2.295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Grading of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) based on tumour budding and cell nest size has been termed cellular dissociation grading (CDG) and was suggested as a robust outcome predictor when assessed in biopsies and resections of various extrapulmonary SCCs. In pulmonary SCC (pSCC), this has so far been shown only for resected cancers. As most lung cancers are inoperable, it is of utmost importance to clarify whether the prognostic impact of CDG is retained in the biopsy setting. Two independent pSCC biopsy cohorts from Munich (<i>n</i> = 134, non-resected) and Heidelberg (<i>n</i> = 135, resected) were assessed. Tumour budding and cell nest size measures were assembled into the three-tiered CDG system (G1–G3). Data were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and overall- (OS), disease-specific- (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Interobserver variability and concordance between biopsy and resection specimen were also investigated. CDG was highly congruent between biopsy and resection specimens (<i>κ</i> = 0.77, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In both pSCC cohorts, biopsy-derived CDG strongly impacted on OS, DSS, and DFS (e.g. DFS: <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In multivariate survival analyses, CDG remained a stage independent predictor of survival in both cohorts (DFS: <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 respectively; hazard ratio Munich cohort: CDG-G2: 4.31, CDG-G3; 5.14; Heidelberg cohort: CDG-G2: 5.87, CDG-G3: 9.07). Interobserver agreement for CDG was almost perfect (<i>κ</i> = 0.84, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). We conclude that assessment of CDG based on tumour budding and cell nest size is feasible on pSCC biopsies and harbours stage independent prognostic information in resectable as well as non-resectable pSCC. Integration of this grading approach into clinicopathological routine should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/51/CJP2-8-567.PMC9535098.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjp2.295\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjp2.295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于肿瘤出芽和细胞巢大小的鳞状细胞癌(SCCs)分级被称为细胞解离分级(CDG),并被认为是在各种肺外鳞状细胞癌的活检和切除中评估的可靠结果预测指标。在肺SCC (pSCC)中,迄今为止仅在切除的癌症中显示出这种情况。由于大多数肺癌是不能手术的,因此明确CDG在活检中是否保留对预后的影响是至关重要的。对来自慕尼黑(n = 134,未切除)和海德堡(n = 135,切除)的两个独立pSCC活检队列进行评估。肿瘤出芽和细胞巢大小测量被组装成三层CDG系统(G1-G3)。数据与临床病理参数、总生存率(OS)、疾病特异性生存率(DSS)和无病生存率(DFS)相关。还研究了活检和切除标本之间的观察者之间的可变性和一致性。活检标本和切除标本的CDG高度一致(κ = 0.77, p < 0.001)。在两个pSCC队列中,活检衍生的CDG强烈影响OS、DSS和DFS(例如DFS: p < 0.001)。在多变量生存分析中,CDG仍然是两个队列中独立于分期的生存预测因子(DFS: p < 0.001;慕尼黑队列:CDG-G2: 4.31, CDG-G3;5.14;海德堡队列:CDG-G2: 5.87, CDG-G3: 9.07)。观察者间对CDG的一致性几乎是完美的(κ = 0.84, p < 0.001)。我们得出结论,基于肿瘤出芽和细胞巢大小的CDG评估在pSCC活检中是可行的,并且在可切除和不可切除的pSCC中包含分期独立的预后信息。应考虑将这种分级方法纳入临床病理常规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cellular dissociation grading on biopsies of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma provides prognostic information across all stages and is congruent with resection specimen grading

Cellular dissociation grading on biopsies of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma provides prognostic information across all stages and is congruent with resection specimen grading

Grading of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) based on tumour budding and cell nest size has been termed cellular dissociation grading (CDG) and was suggested as a robust outcome predictor when assessed in biopsies and resections of various extrapulmonary SCCs. In pulmonary SCC (pSCC), this has so far been shown only for resected cancers. As most lung cancers are inoperable, it is of utmost importance to clarify whether the prognostic impact of CDG is retained in the biopsy setting. Two independent pSCC biopsy cohorts from Munich (n = 134, non-resected) and Heidelberg (n = 135, resected) were assessed. Tumour budding and cell nest size measures were assembled into the three-tiered CDG system (G1–G3). Data were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and overall- (OS), disease-specific- (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Interobserver variability and concordance between biopsy and resection specimen were also investigated. CDG was highly congruent between biopsy and resection specimens (κ = 0.77, p < 0.001). In both pSCC cohorts, biopsy-derived CDG strongly impacted on OS, DSS, and DFS (e.g. DFS: p < 0.001). In multivariate survival analyses, CDG remained a stage independent predictor of survival in both cohorts (DFS: p < 0.001 respectively; hazard ratio Munich cohort: CDG-G2: 4.31, CDG-G3; 5.14; Heidelberg cohort: CDG-G2: 5.87, CDG-G3: 9.07). Interobserver agreement for CDG was almost perfect (κ = 0.84, p < 0.001). We conclude that assessment of CDG based on tumour budding and cell nest size is feasible on pSCC biopsies and harbours stage independent prognostic information in resectable as well as non-resectable pSCC. Integration of this grading approach into clinicopathological routine should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信