Dominik D Mattioli, Geb W Thomas, Steven A Long, Marcus Tatum, Donald D Anderson
{"title":"训练有素的分析师可通过透视图像对骨科技术技能进行快速客观的评估。","authors":"Dominik D Mattioli, Geb W Thomas, Steven A Long, Marcus Tatum, Donald D Anderson","doi":"10.1080/24725579.2022.2035022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skill assessment in orthopedics has traditionally relied on subjective impressions from a supervising surgeon. The feedback derived from these tools may be limited by bias and other practical issues. Objective analysis of intraoperative fluoroscopic images offers an inexpensive, repeatable, and precise assessment strategy without bias. Assessors generally refrain from using the scores of images obtained throughout the operation to evaluate skill for practical reasons. A new system was designed to facilitate rapid analysis of this fluoroscopy via minimally trained analysts. Four expert and four novice analysts independently measured one objective metric for skill using both a custom analysis software and a commercial alternative. Analysts were able to measure the objective metric three times faster when using the custom software, and without a practical difference in accuracy in comparison to the expert analysts using the commercial software. These results suggest that a well-designed fluoroscopy analysis system can facilitate inexpensive, reliable, and objective assessment of surgical skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":37744,"journal":{"name":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","volume":"12 3","pages":"212-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488091/pdf/nihms-1832409.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Trained Analysts Can Perform Fast, Objective Assessment of Orthopedic Technical Skill from Fluoroscopic Images.\",\"authors\":\"Dominik D Mattioli, Geb W Thomas, Steven A Long, Marcus Tatum, Donald D Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24725579.2022.2035022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Skill assessment in orthopedics has traditionally relied on subjective impressions from a supervising surgeon. The feedback derived from these tools may be limited by bias and other practical issues. Objective analysis of intraoperative fluoroscopic images offers an inexpensive, repeatable, and precise assessment strategy without bias. Assessors generally refrain from using the scores of images obtained throughout the operation to evaluate skill for practical reasons. A new system was designed to facilitate rapid analysis of this fluoroscopy via minimally trained analysts. Four expert and four novice analysts independently measured one objective metric for skill using both a custom analysis software and a commercial alternative. Analysts were able to measure the objective metric three times faster when using the custom software, and without a practical difference in accuracy in comparison to the expert analysts using the commercial software. These results suggest that a well-designed fluoroscopy analysis system can facilitate inexpensive, reliable, and objective assessment of surgical skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"212-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488091/pdf/nihms-1832409.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2022.2035022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2022.2035022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minimally Trained Analysts Can Perform Fast, Objective Assessment of Orthopedic Technical Skill from Fluoroscopic Images.
Skill assessment in orthopedics has traditionally relied on subjective impressions from a supervising surgeon. The feedback derived from these tools may be limited by bias and other practical issues. Objective analysis of intraoperative fluoroscopic images offers an inexpensive, repeatable, and precise assessment strategy without bias. Assessors generally refrain from using the scores of images obtained throughout the operation to evaluate skill for practical reasons. A new system was designed to facilitate rapid analysis of this fluoroscopy via minimally trained analysts. Four expert and four novice analysts independently measured one objective metric for skill using both a custom analysis software and a commercial alternative. Analysts were able to measure the objective metric three times faster when using the custom software, and without a practical difference in accuracy in comparison to the expert analysts using the commercial software. These results suggest that a well-designed fluoroscopy analysis system can facilitate inexpensive, reliable, and objective assessment of surgical skills.
期刊介绍:
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering aims to foster the healthcare systems community by publishing high quality papers that have a strong methodological focus and direct applicability to healthcare systems. Published quarterly, the journal supports research that explores: · Healthcare Operations Management · Medical Decision Making · Socio-Technical Systems Analysis related to healthcare · Quality Engineering · Healthcare Informatics · Healthcare Policy We are looking forward to accepting submissions that document the development and use of industrial and systems engineering tools and techniques including: · Healthcare operations research · Healthcare statistics · Healthcare information systems · Healthcare work measurement · Human factors/ergonomics applied to healthcare systems Research that explores the integration of these tools and techniques with those from other engineering and medical disciplines are also featured. We encourage the submission of clinical notes, or practice notes, to show the impact of contributions that will be published. We also encourage authors to collect an impact statement from their clinical partners to show the impact of research in the clinical practices.