滩海水沙中粪便指示菌、人类致病菌及来源追踪标记物的初步调查。

Environment research journal Pub Date : 2009-01-01
Kelly D Goodwin, Lisa Matragrano, David Wanless, Christopher D Sinigalliano, Michael J LaGier
{"title":"滩海水沙中粪便指示菌、人类致病菌及来源追踪标记物的初步调查。","authors":"Kelly D Goodwin,&nbsp;Lisa Matragrano,&nbsp;David Wanless,&nbsp;Christopher D Sinigalliano,&nbsp;Michael J LaGier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data suggesting that fecal indicating bacteria may persist and/or regrow in sand has raised concerns that fecal indicators may become uncoupled from sources of human fecal pollution. To investigate this possibility, wet and dry beach sand, beach water, riverine water, canal water, and raw sewage samples were screened by PCR for certain pathogenic microbes and molecular markers of human fecal pollution. The targets included in this study were human specific <i>Bacteroides</i> (HF8 marker), human-specific enterococci (esp gene), <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Escherichia coli</i> 0157:H7, <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i>, and adenovirus. Sewage samples were also tested for <i>Salmonella</i> species. The results were compared to concentrations of enterococci, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and <i>Bacteroides</i> species, as determined by membrane filtration methods. Molecular analysis yielded positive results for human specific <i>Bacteroides</i>, and <i>S. aureus</i>, in samples of raw sewage. Two of the environmental samples were positive for human specific <i>Bacteroides</i> and one was positive for <i>S. aureus</i>. The PCR screen was negative for other samples and targets, despite exceedance of EPA single sample guidelines for recreational waters on several of the sample dates (5/11 dates). However, estimates of the number of cells delivered to the PCR reaction suggested that few of the samples met the detection limit of the PCR reaction due to a variety of factors. The analysis indicated a need to improve nucleic acid processing in order to enable better delivery of DNA to downstream molecular methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":72927,"journal":{"name":"Environment research journal","volume":"2 4","pages":"395-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788672/pdf/nihms371456.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Preliminary Investigation of Fecal Indicator Bacteria, Human Pathogens, and Source Tracking Markers in Beach Water and Sand.\",\"authors\":\"Kelly D Goodwin,&nbsp;Lisa Matragrano,&nbsp;David Wanless,&nbsp;Christopher D Sinigalliano,&nbsp;Michael J LaGier\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Data suggesting that fecal indicating bacteria may persist and/or regrow in sand has raised concerns that fecal indicators may become uncoupled from sources of human fecal pollution. To investigate this possibility, wet and dry beach sand, beach water, riverine water, canal water, and raw sewage samples were screened by PCR for certain pathogenic microbes and molecular markers of human fecal pollution. The targets included in this study were human specific <i>Bacteroides</i> (HF8 marker), human-specific enterococci (esp gene), <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Escherichia coli</i> 0157:H7, <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i>, and adenovirus. Sewage samples were also tested for <i>Salmonella</i> species. The results were compared to concentrations of enterococci, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and <i>Bacteroides</i> species, as determined by membrane filtration methods. Molecular analysis yielded positive results for human specific <i>Bacteroides</i>, and <i>S. aureus</i>, in samples of raw sewage. Two of the environmental samples were positive for human specific <i>Bacteroides</i> and one was positive for <i>S. aureus</i>. The PCR screen was negative for other samples and targets, despite exceedance of EPA single sample guidelines for recreational waters on several of the sample dates (5/11 dates). However, estimates of the number of cells delivered to the PCR reaction suggested that few of the samples met the detection limit of the PCR reaction due to a variety of factors. The analysis indicated a need to improve nucleic acid processing in order to enable better delivery of DNA to downstream molecular methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment research journal\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"395-417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788672/pdf/nihms371456.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据表明,粪便指示细菌可能在沙子中持续存在和/或重新生长,这引起了人们的关注,即粪便指示物可能与人类粪便污染源分离。为探讨这一可能性,采用PCR技术对干湿沙滩、沙滩水、河流水、运河水和原始污水样本进行了病原微生物和人类粪便污染分子标记的筛选。研究对象包括人特异性拟杆菌(HF8标记)、人特异性肠球菌(esp基因)、金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌0157:H7、空肠弯曲杆菌和腺病毒。污水样本也进行了沙门氏菌检测。将结果与膜过滤法测定的肠球菌、大肠杆菌和拟杆菌的浓度进行比较。分子分析结果显示,在未经处理的污水样本中,人类特有的拟杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌呈阳性。两份环境样本对人类特异性拟杆菌呈阳性,一份对金黄色葡萄球菌呈阳性。尽管在几个采样日期(5/11日期)超过了EPA休闲水单一样本指南,但其他样品和目标的PCR筛选结果为阴性。然而,对传递到PCR反应的细胞数量的估计表明,由于各种因素,很少有样品达到PCR反应的检测限。分析表明需要改进核酸处理,以便更好地将DNA传递到下游分子方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Preliminary Investigation of Fecal Indicator Bacteria, Human Pathogens, and Source Tracking Markers in Beach Water and Sand.

Data suggesting that fecal indicating bacteria may persist and/or regrow in sand has raised concerns that fecal indicators may become uncoupled from sources of human fecal pollution. To investigate this possibility, wet and dry beach sand, beach water, riverine water, canal water, and raw sewage samples were screened by PCR for certain pathogenic microbes and molecular markers of human fecal pollution. The targets included in this study were human specific Bacteroides (HF8 marker), human-specific enterococci (esp gene), Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli 0157:H7, Campylobacter jejuni, and adenovirus. Sewage samples were also tested for Salmonella species. The results were compared to concentrations of enterococci, Escherichia coli, and Bacteroides species, as determined by membrane filtration methods. Molecular analysis yielded positive results for human specific Bacteroides, and S. aureus, in samples of raw sewage. Two of the environmental samples were positive for human specific Bacteroides and one was positive for S. aureus. The PCR screen was negative for other samples and targets, despite exceedance of EPA single sample guidelines for recreational waters on several of the sample dates (5/11 dates). However, estimates of the number of cells delivered to the PCR reaction suggested that few of the samples met the detection limit of the PCR reaction due to a variety of factors. The analysis indicated a need to improve nucleic acid processing in order to enable better delivery of DNA to downstream molecular methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信