与传统的家庭运动计划相比,优化的家庭康复技术可减少上肢损伤:一项亚急性中风的随机、对照、单盲试验

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Veronica A Swanson, Christopher Johnson, Daniel K Zondervan, Nicole Bayus, Phylicia McCoy, Yat Fung Joshua Ng, Jenna Schindele Bs, David J Reinkensmeyer, Susan Shaw
{"title":"与传统的家庭运动计划相比,优化的家庭康复技术可减少上肢损伤:一项亚急性中风的随机、对照、单盲试验","authors":"Veronica A Swanson,&nbsp;Christopher Johnson,&nbsp;Daniel K Zondervan,&nbsp;Nicole Bayus,&nbsp;Phylicia McCoy,&nbsp;Yat Fung Joshua Ng,&nbsp;Jenna Schindele Bs,&nbsp;David J Reinkensmeyer,&nbsp;Susan Shaw","doi":"10.1177/15459683221146995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper extremity (UE) stroke rehabilitation requires patients to perform exercises at home, yet patients show limited benefit from paper-based home exercise programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of 2 home exercise programs for reducing UE impairment: a paper-based approach and a sensorized exercise system that incorporates recommended design features for home rehabilitation technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 27 participants in the subacute phase of stroke were assigned to the sensorized exercise (n = 14) or conventional therapy group (n = 13), though 2 participants in the conventional therapy group were lost to follow-up. Participants were instructed to perform self-guided movement training at home for at least 3 hours/week for 3 consecutive weeks. The sensorized exercise group used FitMi, a computer game with 2 puck-like sensors that encourages movement intensity and auto-progresses users through 40 exercises. The conventional group used a paper book of exercises. The primary outcome measure was the change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) score from baseline to follow-up. Secondary measures included the Modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity (MAS) and the Visual Analog Pain (VAP) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who used FitMi improved by an average of 8.0 ± 4.6 points on the UEFM scale compared to 3.0 ± 6.1 points for the conventional participants, a significant difference (<i>t</i>-test, <i>P</i> = .029). FitMi participants exhibited no significant changes in UE MAS or VAP scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A sensor-based exercise system incorporating a suite of recommended design features significantly and safely reduced UE impairment compared to a paper-based, home exercise program.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03503617.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"37 1","pages":"53-65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896541/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized Home Rehabilitation Technology Reduces Upper Extremity Impairment Compared to a Conventional Home Exercise Program: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial in Subacute Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica A Swanson,&nbsp;Christopher Johnson,&nbsp;Daniel K Zondervan,&nbsp;Nicole Bayus,&nbsp;Phylicia McCoy,&nbsp;Yat Fung Joshua Ng,&nbsp;Jenna Schindele Bs,&nbsp;David J Reinkensmeyer,&nbsp;Susan Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683221146995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper extremity (UE) stroke rehabilitation requires patients to perform exercises at home, yet patients show limited benefit from paper-based home exercise programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of 2 home exercise programs for reducing UE impairment: a paper-based approach and a sensorized exercise system that incorporates recommended design features for home rehabilitation technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 27 participants in the subacute phase of stroke were assigned to the sensorized exercise (n = 14) or conventional therapy group (n = 13), though 2 participants in the conventional therapy group were lost to follow-up. Participants were instructed to perform self-guided movement training at home for at least 3 hours/week for 3 consecutive weeks. The sensorized exercise group used FitMi, a computer game with 2 puck-like sensors that encourages movement intensity and auto-progresses users through 40 exercises. The conventional group used a paper book of exercises. The primary outcome measure was the change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) score from baseline to follow-up. Secondary measures included the Modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity (MAS) and the Visual Analog Pain (VAP) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who used FitMi improved by an average of 8.0 ± 4.6 points on the UEFM scale compared to 3.0 ± 6.1 points for the conventional participants, a significant difference (<i>t</i>-test, <i>P</i> = .029). FitMi participants exhibited no significant changes in UE MAS or VAP scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A sensor-based exercise system incorporating a suite of recommended design features significantly and safely reduced UE impairment compared to a paper-based, home exercise program.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03503617.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"53-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9896541/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221146995\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221146995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:上肢(UE)卒中康复需要患者在家进行锻炼,但患者从基于纸张的家庭锻炼计划中获益有限。目的:比较两种家庭锻炼方案在减少UE损伤方面的有效性:一种是基于纸张的方法,另一种是包含推荐设计功能的家庭康复技术的传感运动系统。方法:在这项单盲、随机对照试验中,27例卒中亚急性期患者被分为感知运动组(n = 14)和常规治疗组(n = 13),常规治疗组有2例患者没有随访。参与者被要求在家中进行自我指导的运动训练,每周至少3小时,连续3周。感应式锻炼组使用FitMi,这是一款电脑游戏,有两个类似冰球的传感器,可以鼓励运动强度,并自动引导用户完成40项锻炼。传统组使用纸质练习本。主要结局指标是上肢Fugl-Meyer (ufm)评分从基线到随访的变化。辅助测量包括改良Ashworth痉挛量表(MAS)和视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAP)。结果:使用FitMi的受试者在UEFM量表上平均提高8.0±4.6分,而使用常规受试者在UEFM量表上平均提高3.0±6.1分,差异有统计学意义(t检验,P = 0.029)。FitMi参与者在UE MAS或VAP评分方面没有明显变化。结论:与基于纸张的家庭锻炼计划相比,基于传感器的锻炼系统结合了一套推荐的设计功能,显著且安全地减少了UE损伤。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03503617。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimized Home Rehabilitation Technology Reduces Upper Extremity Impairment Compared to a Conventional Home Exercise Program: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial in Subacute Stroke.

Optimized Home Rehabilitation Technology Reduces Upper Extremity Impairment Compared to a Conventional Home Exercise Program: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial in Subacute Stroke.

Optimized Home Rehabilitation Technology Reduces Upper Extremity Impairment Compared to a Conventional Home Exercise Program: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial in Subacute Stroke.

Optimized Home Rehabilitation Technology Reduces Upper Extremity Impairment Compared to a Conventional Home Exercise Program: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial in Subacute Stroke.

Background: Upper extremity (UE) stroke rehabilitation requires patients to perform exercises at home, yet patients show limited benefit from paper-based home exercise programs.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of 2 home exercise programs for reducing UE impairment: a paper-based approach and a sensorized exercise system that incorporates recommended design features for home rehabilitation technology.

Methods: In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 27 participants in the subacute phase of stroke were assigned to the sensorized exercise (n = 14) or conventional therapy group (n = 13), though 2 participants in the conventional therapy group were lost to follow-up. Participants were instructed to perform self-guided movement training at home for at least 3 hours/week for 3 consecutive weeks. The sensorized exercise group used FitMi, a computer game with 2 puck-like sensors that encourages movement intensity and auto-progresses users through 40 exercises. The conventional group used a paper book of exercises. The primary outcome measure was the change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) score from baseline to follow-up. Secondary measures included the Modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity (MAS) and the Visual Analog Pain (VAP) scale.

Results: Participants who used FitMi improved by an average of 8.0 ± 4.6 points on the UEFM scale compared to 3.0 ± 6.1 points for the conventional participants, a significant difference (t-test, P = .029). FitMi participants exhibited no significant changes in UE MAS or VAP scores.

Conclusions: A sensor-based exercise system incorporating a suite of recommended design features significantly and safely reduced UE impairment compared to a paper-based, home exercise program.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03503617.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信