小开胸主动脉瓣手术后胸筋膜间平面阻滞及预后。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sreekanth R Cheruku, Amanda A Fox, Hooman Heravi, Neelan Doolabh, Jennifer Davis, Jenny He, Christopher Deonarine, Lauren Bereuter, Joan Reisch, Farzin Ahmed, Lisa Skariah, Anthony Machi
{"title":"小开胸主动脉瓣手术后胸筋膜间平面阻滞及预后。","authors":"Sreekanth R Cheruku,&nbsp;Amanda A Fox,&nbsp;Hooman Heravi,&nbsp;Neelan Doolabh,&nbsp;Jennifer Davis,&nbsp;Jenny He,&nbsp;Christopher Deonarine,&nbsp;Lauren Bereuter,&nbsp;Joan Reisch,&nbsp;Farzin Ahmed,&nbsp;Lisa Skariah,&nbsp;Anthony Machi","doi":"10.1177/10892532221136386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i> Thoracic interfascial plane blocks are increasingly used for pain management after minimally invasive thoracotomy for valve repair and replacement procedures. We hypothesized that the addition of these blocks to the intercostal nerve block injected by the surgeon would further reduce pain scores and opioid utilization. <i>Methods.</i> In this retrospective cohort study, 400 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive thoracotomy for mitral or aortic valve replacement and were extubated within 2 hours of surgery were enrolled. The maximum pain score and opioid utilization on the day of surgery and other outcome variables were compared between patients who received interfascial plane blocks and those who did not. <i>Results.</i>193 (48%) received at least one interfascial plane block while 207 (52%) received no interfascial plane block. Patients who received a thoracic interfascial plane block had a maximum VAS score on the day of surgery (mean 7.4 ± 2.5) after the block was administered which was significantly lower than patients in the control group who did not receive the block (mean 7.9 ± 2.2) (<i>P</i> = .02). Opioid consumption in the interfascial plane block group on the day of surgery was not significantly different from the control group. <i>Conclusion.</i> Compared to intercostal blocks alone, the addition of thoracic interfascial plane blocks was associated with a modest reduction in maximum VAS score on the day of surgery. However, no difference in opioid consumption was noted. Patients who received interfascial plane blocks also had decreased blood transfusion requirements and a shorter hospital length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracic Interfascial Plane Blocks and Outcomes After Minithoracotomy for Valve Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Sreekanth R Cheruku,&nbsp;Amanda A Fox,&nbsp;Hooman Heravi,&nbsp;Neelan Doolabh,&nbsp;Jennifer Davis,&nbsp;Jenny He,&nbsp;Christopher Deonarine,&nbsp;Lauren Bereuter,&nbsp;Joan Reisch,&nbsp;Farzin Ahmed,&nbsp;Lisa Skariah,&nbsp;Anthony Machi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10892532221136386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i> Thoracic interfascial plane blocks are increasingly used for pain management after minimally invasive thoracotomy for valve repair and replacement procedures. We hypothesized that the addition of these blocks to the intercostal nerve block injected by the surgeon would further reduce pain scores and opioid utilization. <i>Methods.</i> In this retrospective cohort study, 400 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive thoracotomy for mitral or aortic valve replacement and were extubated within 2 hours of surgery were enrolled. The maximum pain score and opioid utilization on the day of surgery and other outcome variables were compared between patients who received interfascial plane blocks and those who did not. <i>Results.</i>193 (48%) received at least one interfascial plane block while 207 (52%) received no interfascial plane block. Patients who received a thoracic interfascial plane block had a maximum VAS score on the day of surgery (mean 7.4 ± 2.5) after the block was administered which was significantly lower than patients in the control group who did not receive the block (mean 7.9 ± 2.2) (<i>P</i> = .02). Opioid consumption in the interfascial plane block group on the day of surgery was not significantly different from the control group. <i>Conclusion.</i> Compared to intercostal blocks alone, the addition of thoracic interfascial plane blocks was associated with a modest reduction in maximum VAS score on the day of surgery. However, no difference in opioid consumption was noted. Patients who received interfascial plane blocks also had decreased blood transfusion requirements and a shorter hospital length of stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892532221136386\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892532221136386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

介绍。胸间膜平面阻滞越来越多地用于微创开胸手术后的疼痛管理。我们假设在外科医生注射的肋间神经阻滞的基础上增加这些阻滞会进一步降低疼痛评分和阿片类药物的使用。方法。在这项回顾性队列研究中,400名连续接受微创开胸二尖瓣或主动脉瓣置换术并在手术后2小时内拔管的患者入组。比较接受筋膜间平面阻滞和未接受筋膜间平面阻滞的患者在手术当天的最大疼痛评分和阿片类药物使用以及其他结果变量。结果:193例(48%)接受了至少一次筋膜间面阻滞,207例(52%)未接受筋膜间面阻滞。接受胸筋膜间平面阻滞的患者在阻滞后手术当日VAS评分最高(平均7.4±2.5),显著低于未接受阻滞的对照组患者(平均7.9±2.2)(P = 0.02)。筋膜间平面阻滞组手术当日阿片类药物消耗与对照组无显著差异。结论。与单独的肋间阻滞相比,增加胸筋膜间平面阻滞与手术当天最大VAS评分的适度降低有关。然而,没有注意到阿片类药物消费的差异。接受筋膜间平面阻滞的患者输血需求减少,住院时间缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoracic Interfascial Plane Blocks and Outcomes After Minithoracotomy for Valve Surgery.

Introduction. Thoracic interfascial plane blocks are increasingly used for pain management after minimally invasive thoracotomy for valve repair and replacement procedures. We hypothesized that the addition of these blocks to the intercostal nerve block injected by the surgeon would further reduce pain scores and opioid utilization. Methods. In this retrospective cohort study, 400 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive thoracotomy for mitral or aortic valve replacement and were extubated within 2 hours of surgery were enrolled. The maximum pain score and opioid utilization on the day of surgery and other outcome variables were compared between patients who received interfascial plane blocks and those who did not. Results.193 (48%) received at least one interfascial plane block while 207 (52%) received no interfascial plane block. Patients who received a thoracic interfascial plane block had a maximum VAS score on the day of surgery (mean 7.4 ± 2.5) after the block was administered which was significantly lower than patients in the control group who did not receive the block (mean 7.9 ± 2.2) (P = .02). Opioid consumption in the interfascial plane block group on the day of surgery was not significantly different from the control group. Conclusion. Compared to intercostal blocks alone, the addition of thoracic interfascial plane blocks was associated with a modest reduction in maximum VAS score on the day of surgery. However, no difference in opioid consumption was noted. Patients who received interfascial plane blocks also had decreased blood transfusion requirements and a shorter hospital length of stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信