在QIP基于绩效的公式下,养老院的COVID缓解:绩效真的很重要吗,应该吗?

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elizabeth Plummer, William F Wempe
{"title":"在QIP基于绩效的公式下,养老院的COVID缓解:绩效真的很重要吗,应该吗?","authors":"Elizabeth Plummer,&nbsp;William F Wempe","doi":"10.1177/10775587221096260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Quality Incentive Program (QIP) distributed US$2 billion to nursing homes (NHs) that met performance goals primarily related to their COVID-19 infection rates. We examine how QIP affected 15,331 NHs with different facility and community attributes, and the extent to which QIP payments per resident-week (QIP$) were associated with NHs' COVID-related attributes. We find that QIP$ was primarily determined by <i>county</i> (not facility) infection rates. QIP distributed US$2 billion to NHs for months in which they experienced virtually no COVID-19 cases; US$0 was distributed for months in which they experienced more than 300,000 cases. We find that QIP$ was larger for smaller, nonprofit NHs located in more rural and economically distressed communities. Regression analyses reveal that recipients of larger QIP$ maintained greater supplies of personal protective equipment, conducted more staff testing, and limited admissions of infected residents, and that greater staff testing and limited admissions are also associated with NHs' sustained success in receiving QIP payments. Policymakers should consider whether performance-based payment systems are optimal for addressing public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing Home COVID Relief Under QIP's Performance-Based Formula: Does Performance Actually Matter, and Should It?\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Plummer,&nbsp;William F Wempe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10775587221096260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Quality Incentive Program (QIP) distributed US$2 billion to nursing homes (NHs) that met performance goals primarily related to their COVID-19 infection rates. We examine how QIP affected 15,331 NHs with different facility and community attributes, and the extent to which QIP payments per resident-week (QIP$) were associated with NHs' COVID-related attributes. We find that QIP$ was primarily determined by <i>county</i> (not facility) infection rates. QIP distributed US$2 billion to NHs for months in which they experienced virtually no COVID-19 cases; US$0 was distributed for months in which they experienced more than 300,000 cases. We find that QIP$ was larger for smaller, nonprofit NHs located in more rural and economically distressed communities. Regression analyses reveal that recipients of larger QIP$ maintained greater supplies of personal protective equipment, conducted more staff testing, and limited admissions of infected residents, and that greater staff testing and limited admissions are also associated with NHs' sustained success in receiving QIP payments. Policymakers should consider whether performance-based payment systems are optimal for addressing public health emergencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587221096260\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587221096260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质量激励计划(QIP)向实现主要与COVID-19感染率相关的绩效目标的养老院(NHs)分发了20亿美元。我们研究了QIP如何影响具有不同设施和社区属性的15,331个NHs,以及每个居民周的QIP支付(QIP$)与NHs的covid相关属性的关联程度。我们发现QIP$主要由县(而不是设施)感染率决定。QIP向NHs分配了20亿美元,在这几个月里,NHs几乎没有出现COVID-19病例;在他们经历了30多万例病例的几个月里,分发了0美元。我们发现,位于农村和经济困难社区的小型非营利NHs的QIP$较大。回归分析显示,获得较大QIP资金的受助者维持了更多的个人防护装备供应,进行了更多的工作人员检测,并限制了受感染居民的入院,并且更多的工作人员检测和有限的入院也与NHs在获得QIP支付方面的持续成功有关。决策者应考虑基于绩效的支付制度是否最适合处理突发公共卫生事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing Home COVID Relief Under QIP's Performance-Based Formula: Does Performance Actually Matter, and Should It?

The Quality Incentive Program (QIP) distributed US$2 billion to nursing homes (NHs) that met performance goals primarily related to their COVID-19 infection rates. We examine how QIP affected 15,331 NHs with different facility and community attributes, and the extent to which QIP payments per resident-week (QIP$) were associated with NHs' COVID-related attributes. We find that QIP$ was primarily determined by county (not facility) infection rates. QIP distributed US$2 billion to NHs for months in which they experienced virtually no COVID-19 cases; US$0 was distributed for months in which they experienced more than 300,000 cases. We find that QIP$ was larger for smaller, nonprofit NHs located in more rural and economically distressed communities. Regression analyses reveal that recipients of larger QIP$ maintained greater supplies of personal protective equipment, conducted more staff testing, and limited admissions of infected residents, and that greater staff testing and limited admissions are also associated with NHs' sustained success in receiving QIP payments. Policymakers should consider whether performance-based payment systems are optimal for addressing public health emergencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信