阿那白拉治疗意大利家族性地中海热的预算影响分析。

Q2 Medicine
A Aiello, E E Mariano, M Prada, L Cioni, C Teruzzi, R Manna
{"title":"阿那白拉治疗意大利家族性地中海热的预算影响分析。","authors":"A Aiello,&nbsp;E E Mariano,&nbsp;M Prada,&nbsp;L Cioni,&nbsp;C Teruzzi,&nbsp;R Manna","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2023.2176091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is a hereditary autoinflammatory disease that significantly reduces occupational productivity and quality-of-life in affected patients. Italy has an estimated FMF prevalence of 1 in 60,000 people. While colchicine is the primary treatment for FMF, biologics are administered to intolerant and non-responder patients. Anakinra and canakinumab are the only biologics approved and reimbursed for FMF in Italy. Both medicines have demonstrated efficacy in FMF patients yet differ in treatment costs. This study aimed to perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) following anakinra's reimbursement for FMF treatment, considering pharmaceutical costs from the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 'Reference scenario' (all patients treated with canakinumab) was compared to an 'Alternative scenario', with increased anakinra market shares. The target population was estimated based on the Italian population, epidemiological and market research data. Drugs costs were estimated based on Summary of Product Characteristics and net ex-factory prices. Sensitivity analyses were implemented to test results' robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base case analysis showed an overall cumulative expenditure of €30,586,628 for 'Reference scenario' and € 16,465,548 for 'Alternative scenario'. A cumulative savings of €14,121,080 (46.2%) was calculated over 3 years as a result of the reimbursement and increasing uptake of anakinra. The sensitivity analyses, even considering a discount of 50% for canakinumab, confirmed the base case results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anakinra's introduction, in FMF treatment, provides a financially sustainable option for Italian patients, with savings increasing according to greater use of anakinra.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/f4/ZJMA_11_2176091.PMC9930828.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Budget impact analysis of anakinra in the treatment of familial Mediterranean fever in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"A Aiello,&nbsp;E E Mariano,&nbsp;M Prada,&nbsp;L Cioni,&nbsp;C Teruzzi,&nbsp;R Manna\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20016689.2023.2176091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is a hereditary autoinflammatory disease that significantly reduces occupational productivity and quality-of-life in affected patients. Italy has an estimated FMF prevalence of 1 in 60,000 people. While colchicine is the primary treatment for FMF, biologics are administered to intolerant and non-responder patients. Anakinra and canakinumab are the only biologics approved and reimbursed for FMF in Italy. Both medicines have demonstrated efficacy in FMF patients yet differ in treatment costs. This study aimed to perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) following anakinra's reimbursement for FMF treatment, considering pharmaceutical costs from the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 'Reference scenario' (all patients treated with canakinumab) was compared to an 'Alternative scenario', with increased anakinra market shares. The target population was estimated based on the Italian population, epidemiological and market research data. Drugs costs were estimated based on Summary of Product Characteristics and net ex-factory prices. Sensitivity analyses were implemented to test results' robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base case analysis showed an overall cumulative expenditure of €30,586,628 for 'Reference scenario' and € 16,465,548 for 'Alternative scenario'. A cumulative savings of €14,121,080 (46.2%) was calculated over 3 years as a result of the reimbursement and increasing uptake of anakinra. The sensitivity analyses, even considering a discount of 50% for canakinumab, confirmed the base case results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anakinra's introduction, in FMF treatment, provides a financially sustainable option for Italian patients, with savings increasing according to greater use of anakinra.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/f4/ZJMA_11_2176091.PMC9930828.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2176091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2176091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

家族性地中海热(FMF)是一种遗传性自身炎症性疾病,可显著降低患者的职业生产力和生活质量。据估计,意大利的FMF患病率为六万分之一。虽然秋水仙碱是FMF的主要治疗方法,但生物制剂也用于不耐受和无反应的患者。Anakinra和canakinumab是意大利唯一批准并报销FMF的生物制剂。这两种药物已证明对FMF患者有效,但治疗费用不同。本研究旨在从意大利国家医疗保健服务(NHS)的角度考虑药品成本,对anakinra的FMF治疗报销进行预算影响分析(BIA)。方法:将“参考方案”(所有接受canakinumab治疗的患者)与“替代方案”(增加了anakinra的市场份额)进行比较。目标人群是根据意大利人口、流行病学和市场研究数据估计的。药品成本是根据产品特性摘要和净出厂价格估算的。对检验结果的稳健性进行敏感性分析。结果:基本案例分析显示,“参考方案”的总累计支出为30,586,628欧元,“替代方案”的总累计支出为16,465,548欧元。在3年的时间里,由于报销和阿那那的增加,累计节省了14,121,080欧元(46.2%)。即使考虑到canakinumab 50%的折扣,敏感性分析也证实了基本情况的结果。结论:在FMF治疗中引入Anakinra,为意大利患者提供了经济上可持续的选择,随着更多使用Anakinra,储蓄增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Budget impact analysis of anakinra in the treatment of familial Mediterranean fever in Italy.

Budget impact analysis of anakinra in the treatment of familial Mediterranean fever in Italy.

Budget impact analysis of anakinra in the treatment of familial Mediterranean fever in Italy.

Budget impact analysis of anakinra in the treatment of familial Mediterranean fever in Italy.

Introduction: Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is a hereditary autoinflammatory disease that significantly reduces occupational productivity and quality-of-life in affected patients. Italy has an estimated FMF prevalence of 1 in 60,000 people. While colchicine is the primary treatment for FMF, biologics are administered to intolerant and non-responder patients. Anakinra and canakinumab are the only biologics approved and reimbursed for FMF in Italy. Both medicines have demonstrated efficacy in FMF patients yet differ in treatment costs. This study aimed to perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) following anakinra's reimbursement for FMF treatment, considering pharmaceutical costs from the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) perspective.

Methods: A 'Reference scenario' (all patients treated with canakinumab) was compared to an 'Alternative scenario', with increased anakinra market shares. The target population was estimated based on the Italian population, epidemiological and market research data. Drugs costs were estimated based on Summary of Product Characteristics and net ex-factory prices. Sensitivity analyses were implemented to test results' robustness.

Results: The base case analysis showed an overall cumulative expenditure of €30,586,628 for 'Reference scenario' and € 16,465,548 for 'Alternative scenario'. A cumulative savings of €14,121,080 (46.2%) was calculated over 3 years as a result of the reimbursement and increasing uptake of anakinra. The sensitivity analyses, even considering a discount of 50% for canakinumab, confirmed the base case results.

Conclusions: Anakinra's introduction, in FMF treatment, provides a financially sustainable option for Italian patients, with savings increasing according to greater use of anakinra.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信