Alexis Q Dean, Charles B Stauft, Julianne D Twomey, Joshua Tan, Luca Varani, Tony T Wang, Baolin Zhang
{"title":"针对 SARS-CoV-2 变体的双特异性抗体的结合和中和活性比较评估","authors":"Alexis Q Dean, Charles B Stauft, Julianne D Twomey, Joshua Tan, Luca Varani, Tony T Wang, Baolin Zhang","doi":"10.1093/abt/tbac032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are a vital component in the fight against COVID-19 pandemic, having the potential of both therapeutic and prophylactic applications. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 are particularly promising, given their ability to bind simultaneously to two distinct sites of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the viral spike protein. Such antibodies are complex molecules associated with multi-faceted mechanisms of action that require appropriate bioassays to ensure product quality and manufacturing consistency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed procedures for biolayer interferometry (BLI) and a cell-based virus neutralisation assay, the focus reduction neutralisation test (FRNT). Using both assays, we tested a panel of five BsAbs against different spike variants (Ancestral, Delta and Omicron) to evaluate the use of these analytical methods in assessing binding and neutralisation activities of anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found comparable trends between BLI-derived binding affinity and FRNT-based virus neutralisation activity. Antibodies that displayed high binding affinity against a variant were often followed by potent neutralisation at lower concentrations, whereas those with low binding affinity also demonstrated reduced neutralisation activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support the utility of BLI and FRNT assays in measuring variant-specific binding and virus neutralisation activity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36655,"journal":{"name":"Antibody Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Assessment of the Binding and Neutralisation Activity of Bispecific Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Q Dean, Charles B Stauft, Julianne D Twomey, Joshua Tan, Luca Varani, Tony T Wang, Baolin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/abt/tbac032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are a vital component in the fight against COVID-19 pandemic, having the potential of both therapeutic and prophylactic applications. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 are particularly promising, given their ability to bind simultaneously to two distinct sites of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the viral spike protein. Such antibodies are complex molecules associated with multi-faceted mechanisms of action that require appropriate bioassays to ensure product quality and manufacturing consistency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed procedures for biolayer interferometry (BLI) and a cell-based virus neutralisation assay, the focus reduction neutralisation test (FRNT). Using both assays, we tested a panel of five BsAbs against different spike variants (Ancestral, Delta and Omicron) to evaluate the use of these analytical methods in assessing binding and neutralisation activities of anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found comparable trends between BLI-derived binding affinity and FRNT-based virus neutralisation activity. Antibodies that displayed high binding affinity against a variant were often followed by potent neutralisation at lower concentrations, whereas those with low binding affinity also demonstrated reduced neutralisation activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support the utility of BLI and FRNT assays in measuring variant-specific binding and virus neutralisation activity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibody Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibody Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/abt/tbac032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibody Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/abt/tbac032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:针对SARS-CoV-2的中和抗体是抗击COVID-19大流行的重要组成部分,具有治疗和预防应用的潜力。针对 SARS-CoV-2 的双特异性抗体(BsAbs)特别有前景,因为它们能同时与病毒尖峰蛋白受体结合域(RBD)的两个不同位点结合。这种抗体是复杂的分子,具有多方面的作用机制,需要进行适当的生物测定,以确保产品质量和生产一致性:方法:我们开发了生物层干涉测量法(BLI)和基于细胞的病毒中和试验--聚焦还原中和试验(FRNT)。使用这两种检测方法,我们测试了由五种 BsAbs 组成的针对不同尖峰变体(祖先型、德尔塔型和奥密克隆型)的小组,以评估这些分析方法在评估抗 SARS-CoV-2 疗法的结合和中和活性方面的应用:结果:我们发现 BLI 衍生的结合亲和力与 FRNT 衍生的病毒中和活性之间存在相似趋势。对变异体表现出高结合亲和力的抗体往往在较低浓度下就能产生强效中和作用,而低结合亲和力的抗体也表现出较低的中和活性:结果支持 BLI 和 FRNT 检测法在测量抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的变异体特异性结合力和病毒中和活性方面的实用性。
Comparative Assessment of the Binding and Neutralisation Activity of Bispecific Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants.
Background: Neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are a vital component in the fight against COVID-19 pandemic, having the potential of both therapeutic and prophylactic applications. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 are particularly promising, given their ability to bind simultaneously to two distinct sites of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the viral spike protein. Such antibodies are complex molecules associated with multi-faceted mechanisms of action that require appropriate bioassays to ensure product quality and manufacturing consistency.
Methods: We developed procedures for biolayer interferometry (BLI) and a cell-based virus neutralisation assay, the focus reduction neutralisation test (FRNT). Using both assays, we tested a panel of five BsAbs against different spike variants (Ancestral, Delta and Omicron) to evaluate the use of these analytical methods in assessing binding and neutralisation activities of anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics.
Results: We found comparable trends between BLI-derived binding affinity and FRNT-based virus neutralisation activity. Antibodies that displayed high binding affinity against a variant were often followed by potent neutralisation at lower concentrations, whereas those with low binding affinity also demonstrated reduced neutralisation activity.
Conclusion: The results support the utility of BLI and FRNT assays in measuring variant-specific binding and virus neutralisation activity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.