巨细胞动脉炎在新诊断的风湿性多肌痛患者中的患病率和特征——一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lara C Burg, Pantelis Karakostas, Charlotte Behning, Peter Brossart, Tanaz A Kermani, Valentin S Schäfer
{"title":"巨细胞动脉炎在新诊断的风湿性多肌痛患者中的患病率和特征——一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Lara C Burg,&nbsp;Pantelis Karakostas,&nbsp;Charlotte Behning,&nbsp;Peter Brossart,&nbsp;Tanaz A Kermani,&nbsp;Valentin S Schäfer","doi":"10.1177/1759720X221149963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is known that giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) often occur together. So far, the prevalence of GCA in newly diagnosed PMR patients has not been evaluated in a prospective ultrasound study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of GCA using vascular ultrasound in patients with newly diagnosed PMR.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A consecutive cohort of newly diagnosed PMR patients was prospectively evaluated for the presence of GCA with the use of systematic musculoskeletal and vascular ultrasound examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 60 patients with newly diagnosed PMR were prospectively enrolled. Symptoms and laboratory findings were collected. All patients underwent ultrasound of shoulder and hip joints, and vascular ultrasound evaluating the facial, temporal, carotid, vertebral and axillary arteries. Patients were diagnosed with GCA if they had ultrasound imaging findings of GCA. Patients with PMR (PMR-group) and patients with PMR and GCA (PMR-GCA-group) were compared, and a C-reactive protein (CRP) cut-off value was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GCA was diagnosed in 28 of 60 PMR patients (46%). The PMR-group consisted of 20 (62.5%) females with a mean age of 69 (±9.9) years, while the PMR-GCA-group consisted of 11 (39.3%) females with a mean age of 74 (±8.4) years. In 13 of 28 patients (46%) in the PMR-GCA-group, GCA was subclinical and only diagnosed by ultrasound. The PMR-GCA-group showed higher values of joint effusion and significantly higher CRP values. A CRP cut-off value of 26.5 mg/litre (reference range 0-5 mg/litre) yielded a sensitivity of 66% with a specificity of 73% for GCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCA was found in 46% of newly diagnosed PMR patients; 22% of the patients with PMR had asymptomatic GCA. Joint effusions were higher in the PMR-GCA-group, with significant results for the hip joint. A CRP cut-off value of ⩾26.5 mg/litre in PMR can help in the identification of subclinical GCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":23056,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/07/10.1177_1759720X221149963.PMC9909075.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and characteristics of giant cell arteritis in patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica - a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Lara C Burg,&nbsp;Pantelis Karakostas,&nbsp;Charlotte Behning,&nbsp;Peter Brossart,&nbsp;Tanaz A Kermani,&nbsp;Valentin S Schäfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1759720X221149963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is known that giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) often occur together. So far, the prevalence of GCA in newly diagnosed PMR patients has not been evaluated in a prospective ultrasound study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of GCA using vascular ultrasound in patients with newly diagnosed PMR.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A consecutive cohort of newly diagnosed PMR patients was prospectively evaluated for the presence of GCA with the use of systematic musculoskeletal and vascular ultrasound examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 60 patients with newly diagnosed PMR were prospectively enrolled. Symptoms and laboratory findings were collected. All patients underwent ultrasound of shoulder and hip joints, and vascular ultrasound evaluating the facial, temporal, carotid, vertebral and axillary arteries. Patients were diagnosed with GCA if they had ultrasound imaging findings of GCA. Patients with PMR (PMR-group) and patients with PMR and GCA (PMR-GCA-group) were compared, and a C-reactive protein (CRP) cut-off value was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GCA was diagnosed in 28 of 60 PMR patients (46%). The PMR-group consisted of 20 (62.5%) females with a mean age of 69 (±9.9) years, while the PMR-GCA-group consisted of 11 (39.3%) females with a mean age of 74 (±8.4) years. In 13 of 28 patients (46%) in the PMR-GCA-group, GCA was subclinical and only diagnosed by ultrasound. The PMR-GCA-group showed higher values of joint effusion and significantly higher CRP values. A CRP cut-off value of 26.5 mg/litre (reference range 0-5 mg/litre) yielded a sensitivity of 66% with a specificity of 73% for GCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCA was found in 46% of newly diagnosed PMR patients; 22% of the patients with PMR had asymptomatic GCA. Joint effusions were higher in the PMR-GCA-group, with significant results for the hip joint. A CRP cut-off value of ⩾26.5 mg/litre in PMR can help in the identification of subclinical GCA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/07/10.1177_1759720X221149963.PMC9909075.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221149963\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221149963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:已知巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)和风湿性多肌痛(PMR)常同时发生。到目前为止,在新诊断的PMR患者中,GCA的患病率尚未在前瞻性超声研究中得到评估。目的:本研究的目的是评估血管超声在新诊断的PMR患者中GCA的患病率。设计:通过系统的肌肉骨骼和血管超声检查,前瞻性地评估新诊断的PMR患者是否存在GCA。方法:前瞻性纳入60例新诊断的PMR患者。收集症状和实验室结果。所有患者均行肩关节和髋关节超声检查,并行血管超声检查评估面部、颞、颈动脉、椎动脉和腋窝动脉。如果患者有GCA的超声成像结果,则诊断为GCA。比较PMR患者(PMR-组)和PMR合并GCA患者(PMR-GCA组),并评估c反应蛋白(CRP)临界值。结果:60例PMR患者中有28例(46%)诊断为GCA。pmr组20例(62.5%)女性,平均年龄69(±9.9)岁;pmr - gca组11例(39.3%)女性,平均年龄74(±8.4)岁。在pmr -GCA组的28例患者中,有13例(46%)的GCA是亚临床的,只能通过超声诊断。pmr - gca组关节积液增高,CRP值明显增高。CRP临界值为26.5 mg/升(参考范围0-5 mg/升),对GCA的敏感性为66%,特异性为73%。结论:46%的新诊断PMR患者存在GCA;22%的PMR患者有无症状GCA。关节积液在pmr - gca组较高,对髋关节有显著效果。在PMR中小于26.5 mg/升的CRP临界值可以帮助识别亚临床GCA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prevalence and characteristics of giant cell arteritis in patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica - a prospective cohort study.

Prevalence and characteristics of giant cell arteritis in patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica - a prospective cohort study.

Prevalence and characteristics of giant cell arteritis in patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica - a prospective cohort study.

Prevalence and characteristics of giant cell arteritis in patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica - a prospective cohort study.

Background: It is known that giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) often occur together. So far, the prevalence of GCA in newly diagnosed PMR patients has not been evaluated in a prospective ultrasound study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of GCA using vascular ultrasound in patients with newly diagnosed PMR.

Design: A consecutive cohort of newly diagnosed PMR patients was prospectively evaluated for the presence of GCA with the use of systematic musculoskeletal and vascular ultrasound examination.

Methods: Overall, 60 patients with newly diagnosed PMR were prospectively enrolled. Symptoms and laboratory findings were collected. All patients underwent ultrasound of shoulder and hip joints, and vascular ultrasound evaluating the facial, temporal, carotid, vertebral and axillary arteries. Patients were diagnosed with GCA if they had ultrasound imaging findings of GCA. Patients with PMR (PMR-group) and patients with PMR and GCA (PMR-GCA-group) were compared, and a C-reactive protein (CRP) cut-off value was evaluated.

Results: GCA was diagnosed in 28 of 60 PMR patients (46%). The PMR-group consisted of 20 (62.5%) females with a mean age of 69 (±9.9) years, while the PMR-GCA-group consisted of 11 (39.3%) females with a mean age of 74 (±8.4) years. In 13 of 28 patients (46%) in the PMR-GCA-group, GCA was subclinical and only diagnosed by ultrasound. The PMR-GCA-group showed higher values of joint effusion and significantly higher CRP values. A CRP cut-off value of 26.5 mg/litre (reference range 0-5 mg/litre) yielded a sensitivity of 66% with a specificity of 73% for GCA.

Conclusion: GCA was found in 46% of newly diagnosed PMR patients; 22% of the patients with PMR had asymptomatic GCA. Joint effusions were higher in the PMR-GCA-group, with significant results for the hip joint. A CRP cut-off value of ⩾26.5 mg/litre in PMR can help in the identification of subclinical GCA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of musculoskeletal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信