网络评论中的错误信息和反驳如何影响人们接种COVID-19疫苗的意愿:心理抗拒和误解的作用

IF 3.4 2区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1177/10776990221084606

Yanqing Sun, Fangcao Lu

{"title":"网络评论中的错误信息和反驳如何影响人们接种COVID-19疫苗的意愿:心理抗拒和误解的作用","authors":"Yanqing Sun, Fangcao Lu","doi":"10.1177/10776990221084606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated how exposure to negative and misleading online comments about the COVID-19 vaccination persuasive messages and the ensuing corrective rebuttals of these comments affected people's attitudes and intentions regarding vaccination. An online experiment was performed with 344 adults in the United States. The results showed that rebuttals by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, rather than those by social media users, indirectly increased people's willingness to receive the vaccine by reducing their psychological reactance to persuasive messages and their belief in the misinformation contained in the comments. Rebuttals by social media users became more effective in reducing reactance when people initially had stronger pro-vaccination attitudes.","PeriodicalId":48095,"journal":{"name":"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly","volume":"100 1","pages":"145-171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936178/pdf/10.1177_10776990221084606.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Misinformation and Rebuttals in Online Comments Affect People's Intention to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines: The Roles of Psychological Reactance and Misperceptions.\",\"authors\":\"Yanqing Sun, Fangcao Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10776990221084606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated how exposure to negative and misleading online comments about the COVID-19 vaccination persuasive messages and the ensuing corrective rebuttals of these comments affected people's attitudes and intentions regarding vaccination. An online experiment was performed with 344 adults in the United States. The results showed that rebuttals by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, rather than those by social media users, indirectly increased people's willingness to receive the vaccine by reducing their psychological reactance to persuasive messages and their belief in the misinformation contained in the comments. Rebuttals by social media users became more effective in reducing reactance when people initially had stronger pro-vaccination attitudes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"145-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936178/pdf/10.1177_10776990221084606.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221084606\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221084606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究调查了接触关于COVID-19疫苗接种的负面和误导性在线评论的说服性信息以及随后对这些评论的纠正性反驳如何影响人们对疫苗接种的态度和意图。美国344名成年人参与了一项在线实验。结果显示，疾病控制与预防中心的反驳，而不是社交媒体用户的反驳，通过减少人们对说服性信息的心理抗拒和对评论中包含的错误信息的信念，间接增加了人们接受疫苗的意愿。当人们最初对疫苗接种持更强烈的支持态度时，社交媒体用户的反驳更有效地减少了抵制情绪。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How Misinformation and Rebuttals in Online Comments Affect People's Intention to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines: The Roles of Psychological Reactance and Misperceptions.

This study investigated how exposure to negative and misleading online comments about the COVID-19 vaccination persuasive messages and the ensuing corrective rebuttals of these comments affected people's attitudes and intentions regarding vaccination. An online experiment was performed with 344 adults in the United States. The results showed that rebuttals by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, rather than those by social media users, indirectly increased people's willingness to receive the vaccine by reducing their psychological reactance to persuasive messages and their belief in the misinformation contained in the comments. Rebuttals by social media users became more effective in reducing reactance when people initially had stronger pro-vaccination attitudes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly focuses on research in journalism and mass communication. Each issue features reports of original investigation, presenting the latest developments in theory and methodology of communication, international communication, journalism history, and social and legal problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly also contains book reviews. Refereed. Published four times a year.