横断面调查调查患者对重新安排因COVID-19大流行而取消的筛查结肠镜检查的态度和偏好。

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
K D Valentine, Lauren Leavitt, Steven J Atlas, Emily Chen, Jasmine Ha, Sanja Percac-Lima, Kathleen M Fairfield, Neil Korsen, Paul K J Han, James M Richter, Leigh Simmons, Karen R Sepucha
{"title":"横断面调查调查患者对重新安排因COVID-19大流行而取消的筛查结肠镜检查的态度和偏好。","authors":"K D Valentine,&nbsp;Lauren Leavitt,&nbsp;Steven J Atlas,&nbsp;Emily Chen,&nbsp;Jasmine Ha,&nbsp;Sanja Percac-Lima,&nbsp;Kathleen M Fairfield,&nbsp;Neil Korsen,&nbsp;Paul K J Han,&nbsp;James M Richter,&nbsp;Leigh Simmons,&nbsp;Karen R Sepucha","doi":"10.1177/23814683221141377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Early in the COVID-19 pandemic colonoscopies for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening were canceled. Patient perceptions of the benefits and risks of routine screening relative to health concerns associated with the COVID-19 pandemic were unknown. <b>Purpose.</b> Assess patient anxiety, worry, and interest in CRC screening during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods.</b> A random sample of 200 patients aged 45 to 75 y with colonoscopy cancellation due to COVID-19 in March to May 2020 were surveyed. Anxiety, COVID-19 and CRC risk perceptions, COVID-19 and CRC worry, likelihood of following through with colonoscopy in the next month, and interest in alternatives to colonoscopy were assessed. Subsequent screening was tracked for 12 mo. <b>Results.</b> Respondents (<i>N</i> = 127/200, 63.5%) were on average 60 y old, female (59%), college educated (62% college degree or more), and White (91%). A substantial portion of patients (46%) stated they may not follow through with a colonoscopy in the next month. There was greater interest in stool-based testing than in delaying screening (48% v. 26%). Women, older patients, and patients indicating tolerance of uncertainty due to complexity reported they were less likely to follow through with colonoscopy in the next month. Greater interest in stool-based testing was related to lower perceptions of CRC risk. Greater interest in delaying screening was related to less worry about CRC and less tolerance of risk. Over 12 mo, 60% of participants completed screening. Patients who stated they were more likely to screen in the next month were more likely to complete CRC screening (<i>P</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusions.</b> Respondents who had a colonoscopy canceled during the COVID-19 pandemic varied in interest in rescheduling the procedure. A shared decision-making approach may help patients address varying concerns and select the best approach to screening for them.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>In the wake of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost half of patients stated they were not likely to follow through with a colonoscopy in the short term, about half were interested in screening with a stool-based test, and only one-quarter were interested in delaying screening until next year.Patients who perceived themselves at higher risk of colorectal cancer were less interested in stool-based testing, and patients who were more worried about colorectal cancer were less interested in delaying screening.A shared decision-making approach may be necessary to tailor screening discussions for patients during subsequent waves of the pandemic, other occasions where resources are limited and patient preferences vary, or where patients hold conflicting views of screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"7 2","pages":"23814683221141377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/10/10.1177_23814683221141377.PMC9749064.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-sectional Survey Examining Patient Attitudes and Preferences for Rescheduling Screening Colonoscopies Canceled due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"K D Valentine,&nbsp;Lauren Leavitt,&nbsp;Steven J Atlas,&nbsp;Emily Chen,&nbsp;Jasmine Ha,&nbsp;Sanja Percac-Lima,&nbsp;Kathleen M Fairfield,&nbsp;Neil Korsen,&nbsp;Paul K J Han,&nbsp;James M Richter,&nbsp;Leigh Simmons,&nbsp;Karen R Sepucha\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23814683221141377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Early in the COVID-19 pandemic colonoscopies for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening were canceled. Patient perceptions of the benefits and risks of routine screening relative to health concerns associated with the COVID-19 pandemic were unknown. <b>Purpose.</b> Assess patient anxiety, worry, and interest in CRC screening during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods.</b> A random sample of 200 patients aged 45 to 75 y with colonoscopy cancellation due to COVID-19 in March to May 2020 were surveyed. Anxiety, COVID-19 and CRC risk perceptions, COVID-19 and CRC worry, likelihood of following through with colonoscopy in the next month, and interest in alternatives to colonoscopy were assessed. Subsequent screening was tracked for 12 mo. <b>Results.</b> Respondents (<i>N</i> = 127/200, 63.5%) were on average 60 y old, female (59%), college educated (62% college degree or more), and White (91%). A substantial portion of patients (46%) stated they may not follow through with a colonoscopy in the next month. There was greater interest in stool-based testing than in delaying screening (48% v. 26%). Women, older patients, and patients indicating tolerance of uncertainty due to complexity reported they were less likely to follow through with colonoscopy in the next month. Greater interest in stool-based testing was related to lower perceptions of CRC risk. Greater interest in delaying screening was related to less worry about CRC and less tolerance of risk. Over 12 mo, 60% of participants completed screening. Patients who stated they were more likely to screen in the next month were more likely to complete CRC screening (<i>P</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusions.</b> Respondents who had a colonoscopy canceled during the COVID-19 pandemic varied in interest in rescheduling the procedure. A shared decision-making approach may help patients address varying concerns and select the best approach to screening for them.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>In the wake of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost half of patients stated they were not likely to follow through with a colonoscopy in the short term, about half were interested in screening with a stool-based test, and only one-quarter were interested in delaying screening until next year.Patients who perceived themselves at higher risk of colorectal cancer were less interested in stool-based testing, and patients who were more worried about colorectal cancer were less interested in delaying screening.A shared decision-making approach may be necessary to tailor screening discussions for patients during subsequent waves of the pandemic, other occasions where resources are limited and patient preferences vary, or where patients hold conflicting views of screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"23814683221141377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/10/10.1177_23814683221141377.PMC9749064.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221141377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221141377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景。在COVID-19大流行早期,结肠直肠癌(CRC)筛查的结肠镜检查被取消。患者对与COVID-19大流行相关的健康问题相关的常规筛查的益处和风险的看法尚不清楚。目的。评估患者在COVID-19大流行期间对CRC筛查的焦虑、担忧和兴趣。方法。随机抽取2020年3月至5月因新冠肺炎取消结肠镜检查的患者200例,年龄45 ~ 75岁。评估焦虑、COVID-19和CRC风险认知、COVID-19和CRC担忧、下个月完成结肠镜检查的可能性以及对结肠镜检查替代方案的兴趣。随后随访12个月。结果。受访者(N = 127/200, 63.5%)平均年龄为60岁,女性(59%),大学学历(62%),白人(91%)。相当一部分患者(46%)表示他们可能不会在下个月进行结肠镜检查。与延迟筛查相比,对基于粪便的检测更感兴趣(48%对26%)。女性、老年患者和由于复杂性而对不确定性有耐受性的患者报告说,他们在下个月进行结肠镜检查的可能性较小。对粪便检测的兴趣越大,对CRC风险的认知就越低。对延迟筛查的兴趣越大,对结直肠癌的担忧就越少,对风险的耐受性也越低。超过12个月,60%的参与者完成了筛查。表示更有可能在下个月进行筛查的患者更有可能完成CRC筛查(P = 0.01)。结论。在COVID-19大流行期间取消结肠镜检查的受访者对重新安排手术的兴趣各不相同。共同的决策方法可以帮助患者解决不同的问题,并为他们选择最佳的筛查方法。亮点:在第一波COVID-19大流行之后,近一半的患者表示他们不太可能在短期内坚持进行结肠镜检查,约一半的患者对粪便检查感兴趣,只有四分之一的患者有兴趣将筛查推迟到明年。认为自己结直肠癌风险较高的患者对基于粪便的检查不太感兴趣,而更担心结直肠癌的患者对延迟筛查不太感兴趣。在随后的大流行浪潮中,在资源有限和患者偏好不同的其他场合,或患者对筛查的看法相互矛盾的情况下,可能需要采用共同决策方法来为患者量身定制筛查讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cross-sectional Survey Examining Patient Attitudes and Preferences for Rescheduling Screening Colonoscopies Canceled due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cross-sectional Survey Examining Patient Attitudes and Preferences for Rescheduling Screening Colonoscopies Canceled due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cross-sectional Survey Examining Patient Attitudes and Preferences for Rescheduling Screening Colonoscopies Canceled due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cross-sectional Survey Examining Patient Attitudes and Preferences for Rescheduling Screening Colonoscopies Canceled due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic colonoscopies for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening were canceled. Patient perceptions of the benefits and risks of routine screening relative to health concerns associated with the COVID-19 pandemic were unknown. Purpose. Assess patient anxiety, worry, and interest in CRC screening during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. A random sample of 200 patients aged 45 to 75 y with colonoscopy cancellation due to COVID-19 in March to May 2020 were surveyed. Anxiety, COVID-19 and CRC risk perceptions, COVID-19 and CRC worry, likelihood of following through with colonoscopy in the next month, and interest in alternatives to colonoscopy were assessed. Subsequent screening was tracked for 12 mo. Results. Respondents (N = 127/200, 63.5%) were on average 60 y old, female (59%), college educated (62% college degree or more), and White (91%). A substantial portion of patients (46%) stated they may not follow through with a colonoscopy in the next month. There was greater interest in stool-based testing than in delaying screening (48% v. 26%). Women, older patients, and patients indicating tolerance of uncertainty due to complexity reported they were less likely to follow through with colonoscopy in the next month. Greater interest in stool-based testing was related to lower perceptions of CRC risk. Greater interest in delaying screening was related to less worry about CRC and less tolerance of risk. Over 12 mo, 60% of participants completed screening. Patients who stated they were more likely to screen in the next month were more likely to complete CRC screening (P = 0.01). Conclusions. Respondents who had a colonoscopy canceled during the COVID-19 pandemic varied in interest in rescheduling the procedure. A shared decision-making approach may help patients address varying concerns and select the best approach to screening for them.

Highlights: In the wake of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost half of patients stated they were not likely to follow through with a colonoscopy in the short term, about half were interested in screening with a stool-based test, and only one-quarter were interested in delaying screening until next year.Patients who perceived themselves at higher risk of colorectal cancer were less interested in stool-based testing, and patients who were more worried about colorectal cancer were less interested in delaying screening.A shared decision-making approach may be necessary to tailor screening discussions for patients during subsequent waves of the pandemic, other occasions where resources are limited and patient preferences vary, or where patients hold conflicting views of screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信