为新诊断为癌症的成人提供小组护理安排。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Oscar Perez-Concha, David Goldstein, Mark F Harris, Maarit A Laaksonen, Mark Hanly, Sue Suchy, Claire M Vajdic
{"title":"为新诊断为癌症的成人提供小组护理安排。","authors":"Oscar Perez-Concha,&nbsp;David Goldstein,&nbsp;Mark F Harris,&nbsp;Maarit A Laaksonen,&nbsp;Mark Hanly,&nbsp;Sue Suchy,&nbsp;Claire M Vajdic","doi":"10.1071/PY22078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicare-subsidised Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) support Australian general practitioners to implement shared care between collaborating health professionals for patients with chronic medical conditions and complex needs. We assessed the prevalence of TCAs, factors associated with TCA uptake and visits to TCA-subsidised allied health practitioners, for adults newly diagnosed with cancer in New South Wales, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a retrospective individual patient data linkage study with 13 951 45 and Up Study participants diagnosed with incident cancer during 2006-16. We used a proportional hazards model to estimate the factors associated with receipt of a TCA after cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6630 patients had a TCA plan initiated (47.5%). A TCA was more likely for patients aged ≥65years, those with higher service utilisation 4-15months prior to cancer diagnosis, a higher number of comorbidities, lower self-rated overall health status, living in areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage, lower educational attainment and those with no private health insurance. A total of 4084 (61.6%) patients with a TCA had at least one TCA-subsidised allied health visit within 24months of the TCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCAs appear to be well targeted at cancer patients with chronic health conditions and lower socioeconomic status. Nevertheless, not all patients with a TCA subsequently attended a TCA-subsidised allied healthcare professional. This suggests either a misunderstanding of the plan, the receipt of allied health via other public schemes, a low prioritisation of the plan compared to other health care, or suboptimal availability of these services.</p>","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"29 1","pages":"20-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptake of Team Care Arrangements for adults newly diagnosed with cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Perez-Concha,&nbsp;David Goldstein,&nbsp;Mark F Harris,&nbsp;Maarit A Laaksonen,&nbsp;Mark Hanly,&nbsp;Sue Suchy,&nbsp;Claire M Vajdic\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PY22078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicare-subsidised Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) support Australian general practitioners to implement shared care between collaborating health professionals for patients with chronic medical conditions and complex needs. We assessed the prevalence of TCAs, factors associated with TCA uptake and visits to TCA-subsidised allied health practitioners, for adults newly diagnosed with cancer in New South Wales, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a retrospective individual patient data linkage study with 13 951 45 and Up Study participants diagnosed with incident cancer during 2006-16. We used a proportional hazards model to estimate the factors associated with receipt of a TCA after cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6630 patients had a TCA plan initiated (47.5%). A TCA was more likely for patients aged ≥65years, those with higher service utilisation 4-15months prior to cancer diagnosis, a higher number of comorbidities, lower self-rated overall health status, living in areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage, lower educational attainment and those with no private health insurance. A total of 4084 (61.6%) patients with a TCA had at least one TCA-subsidised allied health visit within 24months of the TCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCAs appear to be well targeted at cancer patients with chronic health conditions and lower socioeconomic status. Nevertheless, not all patients with a TCA subsequently attended a TCA-subsidised allied healthcare professional. This suggests either a misunderstanding of the plan, the receipt of allied health via other public schemes, a low prioritisation of the plan compared to other health care, or suboptimal availability of these services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"20-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗补贴的团队护理安排(TCAs)支持澳大利亚全科医生在合作的卫生专业人员之间为患有慢性疾病和复杂需求的患者实施共享护理。我们评估了澳大利亚新南威尔士州新诊断为癌症的成年人TCA的患病率、与TCA摄取相关的因素以及TCA补贴的联合健康从业人员的就诊情况。方法:我们对2006- 2016年期间诊断为偶发性癌症的13 951 45和Up研究参与者进行了回顾性个体患者数据链接研究。我们使用比例风险模型来估计与癌症诊断后接受TCA相关的因素。结果:共有6630例患者启动了TCA计划(47.5%)。年龄≥65岁、癌症诊断前4-15个月服务利用率较高、合并症数量较多、自评整体健康状况较低、生活在社会经济劣势较大的地区、受教育程度较低以及没有私人健康保险的患者更容易发生TCA。共有4084例(61.6%)TCA患者在TCA后24个月内至少进行过一次由TCA资助的联合健康访问。结论:TCAs似乎很好地针对慢性健康状况和低社会经济地位的癌症患者。然而,并不是所有的TCA患者随后都到TCA资助的专职医疗保健专业人员那里就诊。这表明,要么是对该计划的误解,要么是通过其他公共计划获得联合医疗服务,要么是与其他医疗保健相比,该计划的优先级较低,要么是这些服务的可得性不够理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uptake of Team Care Arrangements for adults newly diagnosed with cancer.

Background: Medicare-subsidised Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) support Australian general practitioners to implement shared care between collaborating health professionals for patients with chronic medical conditions and complex needs. We assessed the prevalence of TCAs, factors associated with TCA uptake and visits to TCA-subsidised allied health practitioners, for adults newly diagnosed with cancer in New South Wales, Australia.

Methods: We carried out a retrospective individual patient data linkage study with 13 951 45 and Up Study participants diagnosed with incident cancer during 2006-16. We used a proportional hazards model to estimate the factors associated with receipt of a TCA after cancer diagnosis.

Results: In total, 6630 patients had a TCA plan initiated (47.5%). A TCA was more likely for patients aged ≥65years, those with higher service utilisation 4-15months prior to cancer diagnosis, a higher number of comorbidities, lower self-rated overall health status, living in areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage, lower educational attainment and those with no private health insurance. A total of 4084 (61.6%) patients with a TCA had at least one TCA-subsidised allied health visit within 24months of the TCA.

Conclusions: TCAs appear to be well targeted at cancer patients with chronic health conditions and lower socioeconomic status. Nevertheless, not all patients with a TCA subsequently attended a TCA-subsidised allied healthcare professional. This suggests either a misunderstanding of the plan, the receipt of allied health via other public schemes, a low prioritisation of the plan compared to other health care, or suboptimal availability of these services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian journal of primary health
Australian journal of primary health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues. Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信