成人膝关节稳定肌的神经肌肉激活的性别特异性差异-系统回顾。

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Martina Steiner, Heiner Baur, Angela Blasimann
{"title":"成人膝关节稳定肌的神经肌肉激活的性别特异性差异-系统回顾。","authors":"Martina Steiner,&nbsp;Heiner Baur,&nbsp;Angela Blasimann","doi":"10.1186/s40945-022-00158-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common injuries of the knee. Women have a higher injury rate for ACL ruptures than men. Various indicators for this sex-specific difference are controversially discussed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>A systematic review of the literature that compares surface electromyography (EMG) values of adult female and male subjects to find out if there is a difference in neuromuscular activation of the knee stabilizing muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review has been guided and informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies which examined sex-specific differences with surface EMG measurements (integral, root mean squares, mean values, analysis of time and amplitude) of the knee stabilizing muscles were retrieved via searches from the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, CENTRAL and SPORTDiscus. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed with the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) study quality assessment tool. A synthesis of results was performed for relevant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies with 462 healthy participants, 233 women (mean age 21.9 (± 2.29) years) and 299 men (mean age 22.6 (± 2.43) years), were included in the systematic review. The methodological quality of the studies was mostly rated \"fair\" (40%). A significantly higher activity of the muscles vastus lateralis and vastus medialis was found in females, in three studies. Two studies found significantly lower neuromuscular activity in the muscles biceps femoris and semitendinosus in females. All other included studies found no significant differences or reported even contradicting results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The controversial findings do not allow for a concluding answer to the question of a sex-specific neuromuscular activation. Further research with higher statistical power and a more homogeneous methodical procedure (tasks and data normalisation) of the included studies may provide insight into possibly existing sex-specific differences in neuromuscular activation. This systematic review could help to improve the methodical design of future studies to get a more valid conclusion of the issue.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CRD42020189504.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"13 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930324/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex-specific differences in neuromuscular activation of the knee stabilizing muscles in adults - a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Martina Steiner,&nbsp;Heiner Baur,&nbsp;Angela Blasimann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40945-022-00158-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common injuries of the knee. Women have a higher injury rate for ACL ruptures than men. Various indicators for this sex-specific difference are controversially discussed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>A systematic review of the literature that compares surface electromyography (EMG) values of adult female and male subjects to find out if there is a difference in neuromuscular activation of the knee stabilizing muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review has been guided and informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies which examined sex-specific differences with surface EMG measurements (integral, root mean squares, mean values, analysis of time and amplitude) of the knee stabilizing muscles were retrieved via searches from the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, CENTRAL and SPORTDiscus. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed with the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) study quality assessment tool. A synthesis of results was performed for relevant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies with 462 healthy participants, 233 women (mean age 21.9 (± 2.29) years) and 299 men (mean age 22.6 (± 2.43) years), were included in the systematic review. The methodological quality of the studies was mostly rated \\\"fair\\\" (40%). A significantly higher activity of the muscles vastus lateralis and vastus medialis was found in females, in three studies. Two studies found significantly lower neuromuscular activity in the muscles biceps femoris and semitendinosus in females. All other included studies found no significant differences or reported even contradicting results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The controversial findings do not allow for a concluding answer to the question of a sex-specific neuromuscular activation. Further research with higher statistical power and a more homogeneous methodical procedure (tasks and data normalisation) of the included studies may provide insight into possibly existing sex-specific differences in neuromuscular activation. This systematic review could help to improve the methodical design of future studies to get a more valid conclusion of the issue.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CRD42020189504.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930324/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-022-00158-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-022-00158-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

前言:前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂是膝关节最常见的损伤之一。女性的前交叉韧带破裂损伤率高于男性。对这种性别差异的各种指标进行了有争议的讨论。目的:系统回顾文献,比较成年女性和男性受试者的表面肌电图(EMG)值,以了解膝关节稳定肌的神经肌肉激活是否存在差异。方法:本系统评价以系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南为指导。通过检索PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、CENTRAL和SPORTDiscus数据库,研究了膝关节稳定肌肉表面肌电测量(积分、均方根、平均值、时间和振幅分析)的性别差异。纳入研究的偏倚风险采用国家心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)研究质量评估工具进行评估。对相关结果进行综合分析。结果:15项研究纳入了462名健康参与者,其中233名女性(平均年龄21.9(±2.29)岁)和299名男性(平均年龄22.6(±2.43)岁)。研究的方法学质量大多被评为“一般”(40%)。在三个研究中发现,女性的股外侧肌和股内侧肌的活动明显更高。两项研究发现,女性股二头肌和半腱肌的神经肌肉活动明显较低。所有其他纳入的研究都没有发现显著差异,甚至报告了相互矛盾的结果。结论:有争议的发现不允许一个结论性的答案,一个性别特异性的神经肌肉激活的问题。对纳入的研究进行更高的统计能力和更均匀的方法程序(任务和数据归一化)的进一步研究可能会深入了解神经肌肉激活中可能存在的性别特异性差异。这一系统综述有助于改进未来研究的方法设计,从而得出更有效的结论。试验注册号:CRD42020189504。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sex-specific differences in neuromuscular activation of the knee stabilizing muscles in adults - a systematic review.

Sex-specific differences in neuromuscular activation of the knee stabilizing muscles in adults - a systematic review.

Introduction: The rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common injuries of the knee. Women have a higher injury rate for ACL ruptures than men. Various indicators for this sex-specific difference are controversially discussed.

Aim: A systematic review of the literature that compares surface electromyography (EMG) values of adult female and male subjects to find out if there is a difference in neuromuscular activation of the knee stabilizing muscles.

Methods: This systematic review has been guided and informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies which examined sex-specific differences with surface EMG measurements (integral, root mean squares, mean values, analysis of time and amplitude) of the knee stabilizing muscles were retrieved via searches from the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, CENTRAL and SPORTDiscus. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed with the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) study quality assessment tool. A synthesis of results was performed for relevant outcomes.

Results: Fifteen studies with 462 healthy participants, 233 women (mean age 21.9 (± 2.29) years) and 299 men (mean age 22.6 (± 2.43) years), were included in the systematic review. The methodological quality of the studies was mostly rated "fair" (40%). A significantly higher activity of the muscles vastus lateralis and vastus medialis was found in females, in three studies. Two studies found significantly lower neuromuscular activity in the muscles biceps femoris and semitendinosus in females. All other included studies found no significant differences or reported even contradicting results.

Conclusion: The controversial findings do not allow for a concluding answer to the question of a sex-specific neuromuscular activation. Further research with higher statistical power and a more homogeneous methodical procedure (tasks and data normalisation) of the included studies may provide insight into possibly existing sex-specific differences in neuromuscular activation. This systematic review could help to improve the methodical design of future studies to get a more valid conclusion of the issue.

Trial registration: CRD42020189504.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信