流行病-大流行影响清单有效性的证据(简短的医疗保健模块):内部结构及其与其他变量的关联。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
John Q Young, Molly McCann-Pineo, Rehana Rasul, Prashant Malhotra, Sophia Jan, Karen Friedman, Samantha S Corley, Andrew C Yacht, Stephen Barone, Mayer Bellehsen, Nidhi Parashar, Rebecca M Schwartz
{"title":"流行病-大流行影响清单有效性的证据(简短的医疗保健模块):内部结构及其与其他变量的关联。","authors":"John Q Young,&nbsp;Molly McCann-Pineo,&nbsp;Rehana Rasul,&nbsp;Prashant Malhotra,&nbsp;Sophia Jan,&nbsp;Karen Friedman,&nbsp;Samantha S Corley,&nbsp;Andrew C Yacht,&nbsp;Stephen Barone,&nbsp;Mayer Bellehsen,&nbsp;Nidhi Parashar,&nbsp;Rebecca M Schwartz","doi":"10.1080/19338244.2022.2093823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has subjected healthcare workers to enormous stress. Measuring the impact of this public health emergency is essential to developing strategies that can effectively promote resilience and wellness. The Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory Supplemental Healthcare Module-Brief Version (EPII-SHMb) was developed to measure impacts among occupational cohorts serving on the front lines of healthcare. While this instrument has been utilized in COVID-19 related studies, little is known about its psychometric properties. This study collects evidence for validity of the EPII-SHMb by evaluating its internal structure and how its scores associate with other variables. Physicians and nursing staff across a large New York health system were cross-sectionally surveyed using an online questionnaire between June and November 2020. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 3-factor solution, identifying factors <i>Lack of Workplace Safety</i> (7 items), <i>Death/Dying of Patients</i> (3 items), and <i>Lack of Outside Support</i> (2 items). Internal consistency was high overall and within physician/nursing and gender subgroups (Cronbach's alpha: 0.70 - 0.81). Median scores on Death/Dying of Patients were higher among those who directly cared for COVID-19 patients or worked in COVID-19 hospital units. These results are promising. Additional studies evaluating other dimensions of validity are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":8173,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health","volume":"78 2","pages":"98-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for validity of the epidemic-pandemic impacts inventory (brief healthcare module): Internal structure and association with other variables.\",\"authors\":\"John Q Young,&nbsp;Molly McCann-Pineo,&nbsp;Rehana Rasul,&nbsp;Prashant Malhotra,&nbsp;Sophia Jan,&nbsp;Karen Friedman,&nbsp;Samantha S Corley,&nbsp;Andrew C Yacht,&nbsp;Stephen Barone,&nbsp;Mayer Bellehsen,&nbsp;Nidhi Parashar,&nbsp;Rebecca M Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19338244.2022.2093823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has subjected healthcare workers to enormous stress. Measuring the impact of this public health emergency is essential to developing strategies that can effectively promote resilience and wellness. The Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory Supplemental Healthcare Module-Brief Version (EPII-SHMb) was developed to measure impacts among occupational cohorts serving on the front lines of healthcare. While this instrument has been utilized in COVID-19 related studies, little is known about its psychometric properties. This study collects evidence for validity of the EPII-SHMb by evaluating its internal structure and how its scores associate with other variables. Physicians and nursing staff across a large New York health system were cross-sectionally surveyed using an online questionnaire between June and November 2020. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 3-factor solution, identifying factors <i>Lack of Workplace Safety</i> (7 items), <i>Death/Dying of Patients</i> (3 items), and <i>Lack of Outside Support</i> (2 items). Internal consistency was high overall and within physician/nursing and gender subgroups (Cronbach's alpha: 0.70 - 0.81). Median scores on Death/Dying of Patients were higher among those who directly cared for COVID-19 patients or worked in COVID-19 hospital units. These results are promising. Additional studies evaluating other dimensions of validity are necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"98-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2022.2093823\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2022.2093823","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

COVID-19大流行给医护人员带来了巨大的压力。衡量这一突发公共卫生事件的影响对于制定能够有效促进复原力和健康的战略至关重要。流行病-大流行影响清单补充医疗保健模块简要版本(EPII-SHMb)的开发是为了衡量服务于医疗保健一线的职业队列的影响。虽然该仪器已用于COVID-19相关研究,但对其心理测量特性知之甚少。本研究通过评估epi - shmb的内部结构及其得分与其他变量的关联来收集有效性的证据。在2020年6月至11月期间,纽约一个大型卫生系统的医生和护理人员使用在线问卷进行了横断面调查。探索性因素分析结果为3因素解决方案,确定了缺乏工作场所安全(7项),患者死亡/死亡(3项)和缺乏外部支持(2项)的因素。内部一致性总体上很高,在医生/护理和性别亚组中也是如此(Cronbach's alpha: 0.70 - 0.81)。在直接照顾COVID-19患者或在COVID-19医院单位工作的患者中,患者死亡/死亡的中位数得分较高。这些结果是有希望的。评估其他效度维度的额外研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence for validity of the epidemic-pandemic impacts inventory (brief healthcare module): Internal structure and association with other variables.

The COVID-19 pandemic has subjected healthcare workers to enormous stress. Measuring the impact of this public health emergency is essential to developing strategies that can effectively promote resilience and wellness. The Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory Supplemental Healthcare Module-Brief Version (EPII-SHMb) was developed to measure impacts among occupational cohorts serving on the front lines of healthcare. While this instrument has been utilized in COVID-19 related studies, little is known about its psychometric properties. This study collects evidence for validity of the EPII-SHMb by evaluating its internal structure and how its scores associate with other variables. Physicians and nursing staff across a large New York health system were cross-sectionally surveyed using an online questionnaire between June and November 2020. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 3-factor solution, identifying factors Lack of Workplace Safety (7 items), Death/Dying of Patients (3 items), and Lack of Outside Support (2 items). Internal consistency was high overall and within physician/nursing and gender subgroups (Cronbach's alpha: 0.70 - 0.81). Median scores on Death/Dying of Patients were higher among those who directly cared for COVID-19 patients or worked in COVID-19 hospital units. These results are promising. Additional studies evaluating other dimensions of validity are necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health , originally founded in 1919 as the Journal of Industrial Hygiene, and perhaps most well-known as the Archives of Environmental Health, reports, integrates, and consolidates the latest research, both nationally and internationally, from fields germane to environmental health, including epidemiology, toxicology, exposure assessment, modeling and biostatistics, risk science and biochemistry. Publishing new research based on the most rigorous methods and discussion to put this work in perspective for public health, public policy, and sustainability, the Archives addresses such topics of current concern as health significance of chemical exposure, toxic waste, new and old energy technologies, industrial processes, and the environmental causation of disease such as neurotoxicity, birth defects, cancer, and chronic degenerative diseases. For more than 90 years, this noted journal has provided objective documentation of the effects of environmental agents on human and, in some cases, animal populations and information of practical importance on which decisions are based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信