基于NGS和基于NGS和fish联合检测肝内胆管癌中FGFR2融合物的首次熟练测试

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Olaf Neumann, Ulrich Lehmann, Stephan Bartels, Nicole Pfarr, Thomas Albrecht, Katharina Ilm, Jens Christmann, Anna-Lena Volckmar, Hannah Goldschmid, Martina Kirchner, Michael Allgäuer, Maria Walker, Hans Kreipe, Andrea Tannapfel, Wilko Weichert, Peter Schirmacher, Daniel Kazdal, Albrecht Stenzinger
{"title":"基于NGS和基于NGS和fish联合检测肝内胆管癌中FGFR2融合物的首次熟练测试","authors":"Olaf Neumann,&nbsp;Ulrich Lehmann,&nbsp;Stephan Bartels,&nbsp;Nicole Pfarr,&nbsp;Thomas Albrecht,&nbsp;Katharina Ilm,&nbsp;Jens Christmann,&nbsp;Anna-Lena Volckmar,&nbsp;Hannah Goldschmid,&nbsp;Martina Kirchner,&nbsp;Michael Allgäuer,&nbsp;Maria Walker,&nbsp;Hans Kreipe,&nbsp;Andrea Tannapfel,&nbsp;Wilko Weichert,&nbsp;Peter Schirmacher,&nbsp;Daniel Kazdal,&nbsp;Albrecht Stenzinger","doi":"10.1002/cjp2.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harbours druggable genetic lesions including <i>FGFR2</i> gene fusions. Reliable and accurate detection of these fusions is becoming a critical component of the molecular work-up, but real-world data on the performance of fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH) and targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) are very limited. Bridging this gap, we report results of the first round robin test for <i>FGFR2</i> fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and contextualise test data with genomic architecture. A cohort of 10 cholangiocarcinoma (4 fusion positive and 6 fusion negative) was tested by the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Data were validated by four academic pathology departments in Germany. Fusion-positive cases comprised <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>BICC1</i>, <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>DBP</i>, <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>TRIM8</i>, and <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>ATE1</i> fusions. In a second step, a round robin test involving 21 academic and non-academic centres testing with RNA-based NGS approaches was carried out; five participants performed FISH testing in addition. Thirteen of 16 (81%) centres successfully passed the NGS only and 3 of 5 (60%) centres passed the combined NGS + FISH round robin test. Identified obstacles were bioinformatic pipelines not optimised for the detection of <i>FGFR2</i> fusions and assays not capable of detecting unknown fusion partners. This study shows the benefit of targeted RNA-NGS for the detection of <i>FGFR2</i> gene fusions. Due to the marked heterogeneity of the genomic architecture of these fusions, fusion partner agnostic (i.e. open) methodological approaches that are capable of identifying yet unknown fusion partners are superior. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls in subsequent bioinformatic analysis and limitations of FISH-based tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":"9 2","pages":"100-107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pathsocjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjp2.308","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First proficiency testing for NGS-based and combined NGS- and FISH-based detection of FGFR2 fusions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Olaf Neumann,&nbsp;Ulrich Lehmann,&nbsp;Stephan Bartels,&nbsp;Nicole Pfarr,&nbsp;Thomas Albrecht,&nbsp;Katharina Ilm,&nbsp;Jens Christmann,&nbsp;Anna-Lena Volckmar,&nbsp;Hannah Goldschmid,&nbsp;Martina Kirchner,&nbsp;Michael Allgäuer,&nbsp;Maria Walker,&nbsp;Hans Kreipe,&nbsp;Andrea Tannapfel,&nbsp;Wilko Weichert,&nbsp;Peter Schirmacher,&nbsp;Daniel Kazdal,&nbsp;Albrecht Stenzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjp2.308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harbours druggable genetic lesions including <i>FGFR2</i> gene fusions. Reliable and accurate detection of these fusions is becoming a critical component of the molecular work-up, but real-world data on the performance of fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH) and targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) are very limited. Bridging this gap, we report results of the first round robin test for <i>FGFR2</i> fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and contextualise test data with genomic architecture. A cohort of 10 cholangiocarcinoma (4 fusion positive and 6 fusion negative) was tested by the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Data were validated by four academic pathology departments in Germany. Fusion-positive cases comprised <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>BICC1</i>, <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>DBP</i>, <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>TRIM8</i>, and <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>ATE1</i> fusions. In a second step, a round robin test involving 21 academic and non-academic centres testing with RNA-based NGS approaches was carried out; five participants performed FISH testing in addition. Thirteen of 16 (81%) centres successfully passed the NGS only and 3 of 5 (60%) centres passed the combined NGS + FISH round robin test. Identified obstacles were bioinformatic pipelines not optimised for the detection of <i>FGFR2</i> fusions and assays not capable of detecting unknown fusion partners. This study shows the benefit of targeted RNA-NGS for the detection of <i>FGFR2</i> gene fusions. Due to the marked heterogeneity of the genomic architecture of these fusions, fusion partner agnostic (i.e. open) methodological approaches that are capable of identifying yet unknown fusion partners are superior. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls in subsequent bioinformatic analysis and limitations of FISH-based tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"100-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pathsocjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjp2.308\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjp2.308\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjp2.308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

肝内胆管癌含有可药物治疗的遗传病变,包括FGFR2基因融合。这些融合物的可靠和准确检测正在成为分子工作的关键组成部分,但关于荧光原位杂交(FISH)和基于靶向rna的下一代测序(NGS)性能的实际数据非常有限。为了弥补这一差距,我们报告了胆管癌中FGFR2融合物的第一轮循环测试结果,并将测试数据与基因组结构联系起来。德国海德堡大学医院病理研究所对10例胆管癌患者(4例融合阳性,6例融合阴性)进行了检测。数据由德国四个学术病理部门验证。融合阳性病例包括FGFR2::BICC1、FGFR2::DBP、FGFR2::TRIM8和FGFR2::ATE1融合。第二步,进行了一轮循环测试,涉及21个学术和非学术中心,使用基于rna的NGS方法进行测试;另外5名参与者进行了FISH测试。16个中心中有13个(81%)成功通过了NGS, 5个中心中有3个(60%)通过了NGS + FISH联合循环测试。确定的障碍是未优化检测FGFR2融合的生物信息管道和无法检测未知融合伴侣的测定。这项研究显示了靶向RNA-NGS检测FGFR2基因融合的益处。由于这些融合的基因组结构具有明显的异质性,能够识别未知融合伙伴的融合伙伴不可知(即开放)方法是优越的。此外,我们强调了随后的生物信息学分析的陷阱和基于fish的测试的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

First proficiency testing for NGS-based and combined NGS- and FISH-based detection of FGFR2 fusions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

First proficiency testing for NGS-based and combined NGS- and FISH-based detection of FGFR2 fusions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harbours druggable genetic lesions including FGFR2 gene fusions. Reliable and accurate detection of these fusions is becoming a critical component of the molecular work-up, but real-world data on the performance of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) are very limited. Bridging this gap, we report results of the first round robin test for FGFR2 fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and contextualise test data with genomic architecture. A cohort of 10 cholangiocarcinoma (4 fusion positive and 6 fusion negative) was tested by the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Data were validated by four academic pathology departments in Germany. Fusion-positive cases comprised FGFR2::BICC1, FGFR2::DBP, FGFR2::TRIM8, and FGFR2::ATE1 fusions. In a second step, a round robin test involving 21 academic and non-academic centres testing with RNA-based NGS approaches was carried out; five participants performed FISH testing in addition. Thirteen of 16 (81%) centres successfully passed the NGS only and 3 of 5 (60%) centres passed the combined NGS + FISH round robin test. Identified obstacles were bioinformatic pipelines not optimised for the detection of FGFR2 fusions and assays not capable of detecting unknown fusion partners. This study shows the benefit of targeted RNA-NGS for the detection of FGFR2 gene fusions. Due to the marked heterogeneity of the genomic architecture of these fusions, fusion partner agnostic (i.e. open) methodological approaches that are capable of identifying yet unknown fusion partners are superior. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls in subsequent bioinformatic analysis and limitations of FISH-based tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信