氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮在自杀想法和行为中的作用:系统综述。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Fabrice Jollant, Romain Colle, Thi Mai Loan Nguyen, Emmanuelle Corruble, Alain M Gardier, Martin Walter, Mocrane Abbar, Gerd Wagner
{"title":"氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮在自杀想法和行为中的作用:系统综述。","authors":"Fabrice Jollant,&nbsp;Romain Colle,&nbsp;Thi Mai Loan Nguyen,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Corruble,&nbsp;Alain M Gardier,&nbsp;Martin Walter,&nbsp;Mocrane Abbar,&nbsp;Gerd Wagner","doi":"10.1177/20451253231151327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 2% of the general population experience suicidal ideas each year and a large number of them will attempt suicide. Evidence-based therapeutic options to manage suicidal crisis are currently limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to overview the findings on the use of ketamine and esketamine for the treatment of suicidal ideas and acts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>PubMed, article references, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to June 30, 2022. Meta-analyses published within the last 2 years were also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 12 randomized controlled trials with reduction of suicidal ideation as the primary objective and 14 trials as secondary objectives. Intravenous racemic ketamine was superior to control drugs (placebo or midazolam) within the first 72 h, in spite of large placebo effects. Adverse events were minor and transient. In contrast, intranasal esketamine did not differ from placebo in large-scale studies. Limitations, clinical considerations, and opportunities for future research include the following points: large placebo effects when studying suicidal ideation reduction; small concerns about blinding quality due to dissociative effects; no studies on the risk/prevention of suicidal acts and mortality; lack of studies beyond affective disorders; no studies in adolescents and older people; lack of knowledge of long-term side effects, notably liability for abuse; no robust predictive markers; limited understanding of the mechanisms of ketamine on suicidal ideas; need for improved assessment of suicidal ideation in clinical trials; need for studies in outpatient settings, emergency room, and liaison consultation; need for research on ketamine administration; limited knowledge on the positive and negative effects of concomitant treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, there is compelling evidence for a favorable short-term benefit-risk balance with intravenous racemic ketamine but not intranasal esketamine. The place of ketamine will have to be defined within a multimodal care strategy for suicidal patients. Caution remains necessary for clinical use, and pharmacovigilance will be essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/68/10.1177_20451253231151327.PMC9912570.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ketamine and esketamine in suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Fabrice Jollant,&nbsp;Romain Colle,&nbsp;Thi Mai Loan Nguyen,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Corruble,&nbsp;Alain M Gardier,&nbsp;Martin Walter,&nbsp;Mocrane Abbar,&nbsp;Gerd Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20451253231151327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 2% of the general population experience suicidal ideas each year and a large number of them will attempt suicide. Evidence-based therapeutic options to manage suicidal crisis are currently limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to overview the findings on the use of ketamine and esketamine for the treatment of suicidal ideas and acts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>PubMed, article references, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to June 30, 2022. Meta-analyses published within the last 2 years were also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 12 randomized controlled trials with reduction of suicidal ideation as the primary objective and 14 trials as secondary objectives. Intravenous racemic ketamine was superior to control drugs (placebo or midazolam) within the first 72 h, in spite of large placebo effects. Adverse events were minor and transient. In contrast, intranasal esketamine did not differ from placebo in large-scale studies. Limitations, clinical considerations, and opportunities for future research include the following points: large placebo effects when studying suicidal ideation reduction; small concerns about blinding quality due to dissociative effects; no studies on the risk/prevention of suicidal acts and mortality; lack of studies beyond affective disorders; no studies in adolescents and older people; lack of knowledge of long-term side effects, notably liability for abuse; no robust predictive markers; limited understanding of the mechanisms of ketamine on suicidal ideas; need for improved assessment of suicidal ideation in clinical trials; need for studies in outpatient settings, emergency room, and liaison consultation; need for research on ketamine administration; limited knowledge on the positive and negative effects of concomitant treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, there is compelling evidence for a favorable short-term benefit-risk balance with intravenous racemic ketamine but not intranasal esketamine. The place of ketamine will have to be defined within a multimodal care strategy for suicidal patients. Caution remains necessary for clinical use, and pharmacovigilance will be essential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/68/10.1177_20451253231151327.PMC9912570.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253231151327\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253231151327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:每年有超过2%的普通人群有自杀念头,其中很多人会尝试自杀。目前管理自杀危机的循证治疗选择有限。目的:本研究的目的是概述氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮用于治疗自杀念头和行为的研究结果。设计:系统回顾。数据来源和方法:截至2022年6月30日,PubMed,文章参考文献和Clinicaltrials.gov。我们也回顾了最近2年内发表的meta分析。结果:我们确定了12项随机对照试验,以减少自杀意念为主要目标,14项试验为次要目标。静脉外消旋氯胺酮在最初72小时内优于对照药物(安慰剂或咪达唑仑),尽管安慰剂效应很大。不良事件轻微且短暂。相比之下,鼻用艾氯胺酮在大规模研究中与安慰剂没有差异。局限性、临床考虑和未来研究的机会包括以下几点:研究减少自杀意念时安慰剂效应大;由于解离效应,对致盲质量的关注较少;没有关于自杀行为和死亡率的风险/预防的研究;缺乏情感性障碍以外的研究;没有针对青少年和老年人的研究;缺乏对长期副作用,特别是滥用责任的认识;没有可靠的预测标记;对氯胺酮抑制自杀念头的机制了解有限;改进临床试验中自杀意念评估的必要性需要在门诊、急诊室和联络会诊进行研究;氯胺酮给药研究的必要性;对伴随治疗的正面和负面影响了解有限。结论:总的来说,有令人信服的证据表明静脉注射氯胺酮有良好的短期利益-风险平衡,而鼻腔注射氯胺酮则没有。必须在针对自杀患者的多模式护理策略中确定氯胺酮的使用位置。临床使用仍需谨慎,药物警戒将是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ketamine and esketamine in suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review.

Ketamine and esketamine in suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review.

Ketamine and esketamine in suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review.

Ketamine and esketamine in suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review.

Background: More than 2% of the general population experience suicidal ideas each year and a large number of them will attempt suicide. Evidence-based therapeutic options to manage suicidal crisis are currently limited.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to overview the findings on the use of ketamine and esketamine for the treatment of suicidal ideas and acts.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources and methods: PubMed, article references, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to June 30, 2022. Meta-analyses published within the last 2 years were also reviewed.

Results: We identified 12 randomized controlled trials with reduction of suicidal ideation as the primary objective and 14 trials as secondary objectives. Intravenous racemic ketamine was superior to control drugs (placebo or midazolam) within the first 72 h, in spite of large placebo effects. Adverse events were minor and transient. In contrast, intranasal esketamine did not differ from placebo in large-scale studies. Limitations, clinical considerations, and opportunities for future research include the following points: large placebo effects when studying suicidal ideation reduction; small concerns about blinding quality due to dissociative effects; no studies on the risk/prevention of suicidal acts and mortality; lack of studies beyond affective disorders; no studies in adolescents and older people; lack of knowledge of long-term side effects, notably liability for abuse; no robust predictive markers; limited understanding of the mechanisms of ketamine on suicidal ideas; need for improved assessment of suicidal ideation in clinical trials; need for studies in outpatient settings, emergency room, and liaison consultation; need for research on ketamine administration; limited knowledge on the positive and negative effects of concomitant treatments.

Conclusion: Overall, there is compelling evidence for a favorable short-term benefit-risk balance with intravenous racemic ketamine but not intranasal esketamine. The place of ketamine will have to be defined within a multimodal care strategy for suicidal patients. Caution remains necessary for clinical use, and pharmacovigilance will be essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信