马凡氏综合征患者Stanford B主动脉夹层的血管内治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yujiro Yokoyama, Junji Tsukagoshi, Sean Hamlin, Hisato Takagi, Toshiki Kuno, Hiroo Takayama
{"title":"马凡氏综合征患者Stanford B主动脉夹层的血管内治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yujiro Yokoyama,&nbsp;Junji Tsukagoshi,&nbsp;Sean Hamlin,&nbsp;Hisato Takagi,&nbsp;Toshiki Kuno,&nbsp;Hiroo Takayama","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12441-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with Marfan Syndrome with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains under debate.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through December 2021 to identify studies that investigated outcomes in MFS patients with TBAD who underwent TEVAR. Data regarding patient characteristics, perioperative and late outcomes were extracted.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twelve studies were identified including 120 patients. The mean age was 40.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.8-43.6). 40.4% (95% CI: 10.8-70.0) of cases were performed emergently. 76.2% (95% CI: 64.6-87.8) of patients had a history of previous aortic surgery. In-hospital mortality was 3.7% (95% CI: 0.6-6.8). Primary endoleak occurred in 15.2% (95% CI: 8.6-21.8), which was comprised of type 1 (9.3% [95% CI: 3.9-14.6]) and type 2 (7.1% [95% CI: 2.3-12.0]) endoleaks. During mean follow-up period of 37.4 months (95% CI: 24.1-50.7), secondary endoleak was reported in 14.1% (95% CI: 7.1-21.1), which was comprised of type 1 (7.4% [95% CI: 2.4-12.5]) and type 2 (4.0% [95% CI: 0.3-7.7]) endoleak. Repeat TEVAR was performed in 15.5% (95% CI: 9.3-21.8) and open aortic surgery in 18.6% (95% CI: 9.6-27.5). Long-term mortality was 11.9% (95% CI: 6.5-17.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis showed that TEVAR for TBAD in patients with MFS has low perioperative morbidity and mortality but was associated with a high rate of late reintervention. This treatment option should be limited to emergent cases and to patients deemed unsuitable for open repair. Lifelong follow-up with imaging is mandatory in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular therapy for Stanford B aortic dissection for patients with Marfan Syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yujiro Yokoyama,&nbsp;Junji Tsukagoshi,&nbsp;Sean Hamlin,&nbsp;Hisato Takagi,&nbsp;Toshiki Kuno,&nbsp;Hiroo Takayama\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12441-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with Marfan Syndrome with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains under debate.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through December 2021 to identify studies that investigated outcomes in MFS patients with TBAD who underwent TEVAR. Data regarding patient characteristics, perioperative and late outcomes were extracted.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twelve studies were identified including 120 patients. The mean age was 40.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.8-43.6). 40.4% (95% CI: 10.8-70.0) of cases were performed emergently. 76.2% (95% CI: 64.6-87.8) of patients had a history of previous aortic surgery. In-hospital mortality was 3.7% (95% CI: 0.6-6.8). Primary endoleak occurred in 15.2% (95% CI: 8.6-21.8), which was comprised of type 1 (9.3% [95% CI: 3.9-14.6]) and type 2 (7.1% [95% CI: 2.3-12.0]) endoleaks. During mean follow-up period of 37.4 months (95% CI: 24.1-50.7), secondary endoleak was reported in 14.1% (95% CI: 7.1-21.1), which was comprised of type 1 (7.4% [95% CI: 2.4-12.5]) and type 2 (4.0% [95% CI: 0.3-7.7]) endoleak. Repeat TEVAR was performed in 15.5% (95% CI: 9.3-21.8) and open aortic surgery in 18.6% (95% CI: 9.6-27.5). Long-term mortality was 11.9% (95% CI: 6.5-17.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis showed that TEVAR for TBAD in patients with MFS has low perioperative morbidity and mortality but was associated with a high rate of late reintervention. This treatment option should be limited to emergent cases and to patients deemed unsuitable for open repair. Lifelong follow-up with imaging is mandatory in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12441-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12441-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导论:胸椎血管内主动脉修复术(TEVAR)在马凡综合征合并Stanford B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)患者中的作用仍存在争议。证据获取:MEDLINE和EMBASE检索到2021年12月,以确定调查接受TEVAR的MFS合并TBAD患者结局的研究。提取有关患者特征、围手术期和晚期预后的数据。证据综合:纳入12项研究,包括120例患者。平均年龄为40.2岁(95%可信区间[CI], 36.8-43.6)。40.4% (95% CI: 10.8 ~ 70.0)的病例接受急诊治疗。76.2% (95% CI: 64.6 ~ 87.8)患者既往有主动脉手术史。住院死亡率为3.7% (95% CI: 0.6-6.8)。原发性内漏发生率为15.2% (95% CI: 8.6-21.8),其中包括1型(9.3% [95% CI: 3.9-14.6])和2型(7.1% [95% CI: 2.3-12.0])内漏。平均随访37.4个月(95% CI: 24.1-50.7), 14.1% (95% CI: 7.1-21.1)报告继发性内漏,包括1型(7.4% [95% CI: 2.4-12.5])和2型(4.0% [95% CI: 0.3-7.7])内漏。15.5%的患者进行了重复TEVAR (95% CI: 9.3-21.8), 18.6%的患者进行了主动脉开腹手术(95% CI: 9.6-27.5)。长期死亡率为11.9% (95% CI: 6.5-17.3)。结论:我们的分析显示,MFS患者的TBAD TEVAR围手术期发病率和死亡率较低,但与后期再干预率高相关。这种治疗方案应限于紧急病例和认为不适合开放修复的患者。在这一人群中,终身随访和影像学检查是强制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endovascular therapy for Stanford B aortic dissection for patients with Marfan Syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: The role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with Marfan Syndrome with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains under debate.

Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through December 2021 to identify studies that investigated outcomes in MFS patients with TBAD who underwent TEVAR. Data regarding patient characteristics, perioperative and late outcomes were extracted.

Evidence synthesis: Twelve studies were identified including 120 patients. The mean age was 40.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.8-43.6). 40.4% (95% CI: 10.8-70.0) of cases were performed emergently. 76.2% (95% CI: 64.6-87.8) of patients had a history of previous aortic surgery. In-hospital mortality was 3.7% (95% CI: 0.6-6.8). Primary endoleak occurred in 15.2% (95% CI: 8.6-21.8), which was comprised of type 1 (9.3% [95% CI: 3.9-14.6]) and type 2 (7.1% [95% CI: 2.3-12.0]) endoleaks. During mean follow-up period of 37.4 months (95% CI: 24.1-50.7), secondary endoleak was reported in 14.1% (95% CI: 7.1-21.1), which was comprised of type 1 (7.4% [95% CI: 2.4-12.5]) and type 2 (4.0% [95% CI: 0.3-7.7]) endoleak. Repeat TEVAR was performed in 15.5% (95% CI: 9.3-21.8) and open aortic surgery in 18.6% (95% CI: 9.6-27.5). Long-term mortality was 11.9% (95% CI: 6.5-17.3).

Conclusions: Our analysis showed that TEVAR for TBAD in patients with MFS has low perioperative morbidity and mortality but was associated with a high rate of late reintervention. This treatment option should be limited to emergent cases and to patients deemed unsuitable for open repair. Lifelong follow-up with imaging is mandatory in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery publishes scientific papers on cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信