数位重植练习:三种大鼠模型的比较。

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2021-01-07 eCollection Date: 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1722537
Bolaji Oyawale Mofikoya, Andrew Omotayo Ugburo, Orimisan Belie
{"title":"数位重植练习:三种大鼠模型的比较。","authors":"Bolaji Oyawale Mofikoya, Andrew Omotayo Ugburo, Orimisan Belie","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1722537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digit replantation is a complex surgery that nearly always needs to be done as an emergency. As such it is often difficult to teach. Several models have been developed to train surgeons in this procedure. We compare three rat models of replantation with the aim of ascertaining which most simulates the digit replantation. Inbred albino rats were selected and divided into three groups of 13 each, tail, penile, and hind replant groups. Three rats in each group were anesthetized, the specific amputation injury is created and is replanted for the anatomic component of the study. For the comparative section, 10 animals were anesthesized and the amputated parts were replanted under standard conditions. The parameters measured included weight, vessels and nerve diameters, method of fixation, total ischemia and replant times, the patency rates (after operation and at one week post surgery), as well as postoperative complications. All rats survived in the procedure. There was patency in all groups immediately. Rat tail group had 90%, penile group 100%, and hind limb group 90% survival 1 week after the replantation. There was one mortality in the hind limb group. The penile replant group was the shortest ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001), and all vessel sizes were comparable except the central artery of the tail which was significantly smaller ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). The processes of the hind limb group most simulated the human digit replant procedure, though the ischemia and total replant times are significantly longer ( <i>p</i>  < 0.005). Though the immediate and 1 week patency rates were similar in all three groups, the hind limb replantation model involved steps most similar to human digit replant surgery and is recommended as the preferred teaching model.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"37-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904978/pdf/10-1055-s-0040-1722537.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digit Replantation Practice: A Comparison of Three Rat Models.\",\"authors\":\"Bolaji Oyawale Mofikoya, Andrew Omotayo Ugburo, Orimisan Belie\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0040-1722537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Digit replantation is a complex surgery that nearly always needs to be done as an emergency. As such it is often difficult to teach. Several models have been developed to train surgeons in this procedure. We compare three rat models of replantation with the aim of ascertaining which most simulates the digit replantation. Inbred albino rats were selected and divided into three groups of 13 each, tail, penile, and hind replant groups. Three rats in each group were anesthetized, the specific amputation injury is created and is replanted for the anatomic component of the study. For the comparative section, 10 animals were anesthesized and the amputated parts were replanted under standard conditions. The parameters measured included weight, vessels and nerve diameters, method of fixation, total ischemia and replant times, the patency rates (after operation and at one week post surgery), as well as postoperative complications. All rats survived in the procedure. There was patency in all groups immediately. Rat tail group had 90%, penile group 100%, and hind limb group 90% survival 1 week after the replantation. There was one mortality in the hind limb group. The penile replant group was the shortest ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001), and all vessel sizes were comparable except the central artery of the tail which was significantly smaller ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). The processes of the hind limb group most simulated the human digit replant procedure, though the ischemia and total replant times are significantly longer ( <i>p</i>  < 0.005). Though the immediate and 1 week patency rates were similar in all three groups, the hind limb replantation model involved steps most similar to human digit replant surgery and is recommended as the preferred teaching model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"37-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904978/pdf/10-1055-s-0040-1722537.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

断指再植是一项复杂的手术,几乎总是需要在紧急情况下进行。因此,这种手术通常很难教授。目前已开发出多种模型来训练外科医生进行这种手术。我们对三种大鼠再植模型进行了比较,旨在确定哪种模型最能模拟指骨再植手术。我们挑选了近交系白化大鼠,将其分为三组,每组 13 只,分别为尾部、阴茎和后部再植组。每组三只大鼠均被麻醉,制造特定的截肢损伤,并进行解剖部分的再植研究。在比较部分,对 10 只动物进行麻醉,并在标准条件下对截肢部位进行再植。测量的参数包括体重、血管和神经直径、固定方法、总缺血和再植时间、通畅率(术后和术后一周)以及术后并发症。所有大鼠均在手术中存活。所有组别都能立即通畅。大鼠尾部组 90%、阴茎组 100%、后肢组 90%在再植后一周内存活。后肢组有一只死亡。阴茎再植组手术时间最短( p p p p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digit Replantation Practice: A Comparison of Three Rat Models.

Digit replantation is a complex surgery that nearly always needs to be done as an emergency. As such it is often difficult to teach. Several models have been developed to train surgeons in this procedure. We compare three rat models of replantation with the aim of ascertaining which most simulates the digit replantation. Inbred albino rats were selected and divided into three groups of 13 each, tail, penile, and hind replant groups. Three rats in each group were anesthetized, the specific amputation injury is created and is replanted for the anatomic component of the study. For the comparative section, 10 animals were anesthesized and the amputated parts were replanted under standard conditions. The parameters measured included weight, vessels and nerve diameters, method of fixation, total ischemia and replant times, the patency rates (after operation and at one week post surgery), as well as postoperative complications. All rats survived in the procedure. There was patency in all groups immediately. Rat tail group had 90%, penile group 100%, and hind limb group 90% survival 1 week after the replantation. There was one mortality in the hind limb group. The penile replant group was the shortest ( p  < 0.001), and all vessel sizes were comparable except the central artery of the tail which was significantly smaller ( p  < 0.001). The processes of the hind limb group most simulated the human digit replant procedure, though the ischemia and total replant times are significantly longer ( p  < 0.005). Though the immediate and 1 week patency rates were similar in all three groups, the hind limb replantation model involved steps most similar to human digit replant surgery and is recommended as the preferred teaching model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信