不同教学资源对不同执行功能水平学龄前儿童大小概念形成的效果。

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Aleksander N Veraksa, Anastasia N Sidneva, Margarita S Aslanova, Valeria A Plotnikova
{"title":"不同教学资源对不同执行功能水平学龄前儿童大小概念形成的效果。","authors":"Aleksander N Veraksa,&nbsp;Anastasia N Sidneva,&nbsp;Margarita S Aslanova,&nbsp;Valeria A Plotnikova","doi":"10.11621/pir.2022.0405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown the great importance of early mathematical development as a predictor of subsequent success, which poses the question of how to organize preschool mathematical education with a view to the children's age characteristics, including their cognitive development. In other words, mathematical concepts and actions should be formed with the help of teaching resources appropriate to the child's development.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of three teaching resources (examples, models, and symbols) in formation of the concept of magnitude in older preschoolers (ages 6-7) with different levels of executive function.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Four training programs (with 15 twenty-minute lessons each) were developed and conducted in a formative experiment for older preschoolers with different levels of development of executive functions. The lessons addressed the concept of magnitude (length, area, volume), using different types of teaching resources: exemplars (in traditional and game variants), models, and symbols. The total sample of 116 subjects (44% boys) was divided into 4 groups for each of the programs, plus a control group in which no sessions were conducted. The groups were equalized according to the initial level of development of concepts of magnitude and the level of development of executive functions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant increase in the quality of mastery of the concept of magnitude in three experimental groups (\"symbolic,\" \"traditional,\" and \"traditional with imaginary characters\") compared with the control group. The formative effect of the \"model-building\" program showed no significant differences from the effect of the child's natural development (the control group). We also showed that children with a low level of regulation learned mathematical concepts more effectively with the \"symbolic\" program; children with a medium level of regulation with the \"symbolic\" and any variant of the \"traditional\" program; and children with a high level of regulation with the \"symbolic\" and \"model-building\" programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underline the importance of both the type of teaching resources used and the level of development of voluntary regulation, when teaching mathematics to preschoolers.</p>","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"15 4","pages":"62-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903239/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Different Teaching Resources for Forming the Concept of Magnitude in Older Preschoolers with Varied Levels of Executive Functions.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksander N Veraksa,&nbsp;Anastasia N Sidneva,&nbsp;Margarita S Aslanova,&nbsp;Valeria A Plotnikova\",\"doi\":\"10.11621/pir.2022.0405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown the great importance of early mathematical development as a predictor of subsequent success, which poses the question of how to organize preschool mathematical education with a view to the children's age characteristics, including their cognitive development. In other words, mathematical concepts and actions should be formed with the help of teaching resources appropriate to the child's development.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of three teaching resources (examples, models, and symbols) in formation of the concept of magnitude in older preschoolers (ages 6-7) with different levels of executive function.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Four training programs (with 15 twenty-minute lessons each) were developed and conducted in a formative experiment for older preschoolers with different levels of development of executive functions. The lessons addressed the concept of magnitude (length, area, volume), using different types of teaching resources: exemplars (in traditional and game variants), models, and symbols. The total sample of 116 subjects (44% boys) was divided into 4 groups for each of the programs, plus a control group in which no sessions were conducted. The groups were equalized according to the initial level of development of concepts of magnitude and the level of development of executive functions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant increase in the quality of mastery of the concept of magnitude in three experimental groups (\\\"symbolic,\\\" \\\"traditional,\\\" and \\\"traditional with imaginary characters\\\") compared with the control group. The formative effect of the \\\"model-building\\\" program showed no significant differences from the effect of the child's natural development (the control group). We also showed that children with a low level of regulation learned mathematical concepts more effectively with the \\\"symbolic\\\" program; children with a medium level of regulation with the \\\"symbolic\\\" and any variant of the \\\"traditional\\\" program; and children with a high level of regulation with the \\\"symbolic\\\" and \\\"model-building\\\" programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underline the importance of both the type of teaching resources used and the level of development of voluntary regulation, when teaching mathematics to preschoolers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"62-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:研究表明,早期数学发展对未来的成功具有重要的预测作用,这就提出了如何根据儿童的年龄特征,包括他们的认知发展来组织学前数学教育的问题。换句话说,数学概念和数学动作的形成应该借助适合儿童发展的教学资源。目的:探讨实例、模型和符号三种教学资源对6-7岁不同执行功能水平学龄前儿童大小概念形成的影响。设计:针对不同执行功能发展水平的大龄学龄前儿童,开发了四个训练项目(每个项目15节,每节20分钟),并进行了形成性实验。课程涉及大小(长度,面积,体积)的概念,使用不同类型的教学资源:范例(传统和游戏变体),模型和符号。总共116名受试者(44%为男孩)被分为4组,每组进行一个项目,另外还有一个对照组,没有进行任何课程。这些组是根据大小概念的初始发展水平和执行功能的发展水平来划分的。结果:与对照组相比,三个实验组(“符号”、“传统”和“带有虚构字符的传统”)对大小概念的掌握质量有统计学上的显著提高。“建立模型”项目的形成效果与儿童自然发展(对照组)的形成效果无显著差异。我们还发现,调节水平低的儿童通过“符号”程序更有效地学习数学概念;对“象征性”和“传统”节目的任何变体具有中等水平的调节能力的儿童;而在“象征性”和“模型构建”项目中具有高水平调节能力的儿童。结论:研究结果强调了在对学龄前儿童进行数学教学时,所使用的教学资源类型和自愿调节的发展水平的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of Different Teaching Resources for Forming the Concept of Magnitude in Older Preschoolers with Varied Levels of Executive Functions.

Effectiveness of Different Teaching Resources for Forming the Concept of Magnitude in Older Preschoolers with Varied Levels of Executive Functions.

Effectiveness of Different Teaching Resources for Forming the Concept of Magnitude in Older Preschoolers with Varied Levels of Executive Functions.

Background: Studies have shown the great importance of early mathematical development as a predictor of subsequent success, which poses the question of how to organize preschool mathematical education with a view to the children's age characteristics, including their cognitive development. In other words, mathematical concepts and actions should be formed with the help of teaching resources appropriate to the child's development.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of three teaching resources (examples, models, and symbols) in formation of the concept of magnitude in older preschoolers (ages 6-7) with different levels of executive function.

Design: Four training programs (with 15 twenty-minute lessons each) were developed and conducted in a formative experiment for older preschoolers with different levels of development of executive functions. The lessons addressed the concept of magnitude (length, area, volume), using different types of teaching resources: exemplars (in traditional and game variants), models, and symbols. The total sample of 116 subjects (44% boys) was divided into 4 groups for each of the programs, plus a control group in which no sessions were conducted. The groups were equalized according to the initial level of development of concepts of magnitude and the level of development of executive functions.

Results: There was a statistically significant increase in the quality of mastery of the concept of magnitude in three experimental groups ("symbolic," "traditional," and "traditional with imaginary characters") compared with the control group. The formative effect of the "model-building" program showed no significant differences from the effect of the child's natural development (the control group). We also showed that children with a low level of regulation learned mathematical concepts more effectively with the "symbolic" program; children with a medium level of regulation with the "symbolic" and any variant of the "traditional" program; and children with a high level of regulation with the "symbolic" and "model-building" programs.

Conclusion: The findings underline the importance of both the type of teaching resources used and the level of development of voluntary regulation, when teaching mathematics to preschoolers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信