护理院执业护士采用的干预措施:改进和验证现有的奥马哈系统护理干预集。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Yu Jin Kang, Yinfei Duan, Christine A Mueller, Barbara J McMorris, Joseph E Gaugler, Karen A Monsen
{"title":"护理院执业护士采用的干预措施:改进和验证现有的奥马哈系统护理干预集。","authors":"Yu Jin Kang,&nbsp;Yinfei Duan,&nbsp;Christine A Mueller,&nbsp;Barbara J McMorris,&nbsp;Joseph E Gaugler,&nbsp;Karen A Monsen","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2021-0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Demands on long-term services and supports for older adults are growing, although geriatric workforce shortages have persisted for decades. Methods to define and quantify practice of licensed nurses in nursing homes are needed for work optimization within limited nurse resources available in nursing homes. This study aimed to refine and validate observable nursing interventions for nursing homes, using the Omaha System. <b>Methods:</b> Based on the existing corpus of Omaha System interventions for acute care nursing, this multi-phase, multi-method study included a mapping procedure of interviews from licensed nurses in nursing homes, the evaluation of content validity and coding of the interventions using a survey, and inter-observer reliability assessment using TimeCaT. <b>Results:</b> This study validated 57 observable interventions for nursing homes. Of the previously identified acute care nursing interventions, eight interventions were deemed out of scope. One additional intervention was identified. Refined intervention definitions were related to procedures common in acute care settings such as tracheal intubations/extubations and nasogastric tube insertion that were not performed in nursing homes. Expert agreement for content validity and coding of the interventions was high (S-CVI = 0.97), and inter-observer reliability levels (Cohen's κ value >0.4; proportion agreement >60%) were acceptable for all case studies. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> The validated observable Omaha System nursing interventions for nursing home practice have potential for use in future studies of nursing home practice to understand evidence-based practice, and gaps in care provided. The methodology may be extended to define observable interventions for other roles and settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions Employed By Licensed Nurses in Nursing Homes: Refinement and Validation of an Existing Omaha System Nursing Intervention Set.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Jin Kang,&nbsp;Yinfei Duan,&nbsp;Christine A Mueller,&nbsp;Barbara J McMorris,&nbsp;Joseph E Gaugler,&nbsp;Karen A Monsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/RTNP-2021-0112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Demands on long-term services and supports for older adults are growing, although geriatric workforce shortages have persisted for decades. Methods to define and quantify practice of licensed nurses in nursing homes are needed for work optimization within limited nurse resources available in nursing homes. This study aimed to refine and validate observable nursing interventions for nursing homes, using the Omaha System. <b>Methods:</b> Based on the existing corpus of Omaha System interventions for acute care nursing, this multi-phase, multi-method study included a mapping procedure of interviews from licensed nurses in nursing homes, the evaluation of content validity and coding of the interventions using a survey, and inter-observer reliability assessment using TimeCaT. <b>Results:</b> This study validated 57 observable interventions for nursing homes. Of the previously identified acute care nursing interventions, eight interventions were deemed out of scope. One additional intervention was identified. Refined intervention definitions were related to procedures common in acute care settings such as tracheal intubations/extubations and nasogastric tube insertion that were not performed in nursing homes. Expert agreement for content validity and coding of the interventions was high (S-CVI = 0.97), and inter-observer reliability levels (Cohen's κ value >0.4; proportion agreement >60%) were acceptable for all case studies. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> The validated observable Omaha System nursing interventions for nursing home practice have potential for use in future studies of nursing home practice to understand evidence-based practice, and gaps in care provided. The methodology may be extended to define observable interventions for other roles and settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2021-0112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2021-0112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景和目的:尽管老年劳动力短缺已经持续了几十年,但对老年人长期服务和支持的需求正在增长。在养老院有限的护士资源范围内,需要确定和量化持证护士的实践方法来优化工作。本研究旨在使用奥马哈系统来完善和验证疗养院的可观察护理干预措施。方法:基于现有的奥马哈系统急性护理干预语料库,本研究采用多阶段、多方法,包括对养老院执业护士进行访谈,使用问卷调查对干预措施的内容效度和编码进行评估,并使用TimeCaT进行观察者间信度评估。结果:本研究验证了57项可观察的养老院干预措施。在先前确定的急性护理干预措施中,有8项干预措施被认为超出了范围。确定了一个额外的干预措施。精细化的干预定义与急性护理环境中常见的程序有关,如气管插管/拔管和鼻胃管插入,这些在疗养院中没有进行。专家对干预措施的内容效度和编码的一致性很高(S-CVI = 0.97),观察者间的信度水平(Cohen's κ值>0.4;比例一致性>60%)在所有案例研究中都是可接受的。对实践的启示:经过验证的可观察的奥马哈系统护理干预措施在养老院实践中有可能在未来的养老院实践研究中使用,以了解循证实践,以及所提供护理的差距。该方法可以扩展到为其他角色和环境定义可观察的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions Employed By Licensed Nurses in Nursing Homes: Refinement and Validation of an Existing Omaha System Nursing Intervention Set.

Background and Purpose: Demands on long-term services and supports for older adults are growing, although geriatric workforce shortages have persisted for decades. Methods to define and quantify practice of licensed nurses in nursing homes are needed for work optimization within limited nurse resources available in nursing homes. This study aimed to refine and validate observable nursing interventions for nursing homes, using the Omaha System. Methods: Based on the existing corpus of Omaha System interventions for acute care nursing, this multi-phase, multi-method study included a mapping procedure of interviews from licensed nurses in nursing homes, the evaluation of content validity and coding of the interventions using a survey, and inter-observer reliability assessment using TimeCaT. Results: This study validated 57 observable interventions for nursing homes. Of the previously identified acute care nursing interventions, eight interventions were deemed out of scope. One additional intervention was identified. Refined intervention definitions were related to procedures common in acute care settings such as tracheal intubations/extubations and nasogastric tube insertion that were not performed in nursing homes. Expert agreement for content validity and coding of the interventions was high (S-CVI = 0.97), and inter-observer reliability levels (Cohen's κ value >0.4; proportion agreement >60%) were acceptable for all case studies. Implications for Practice: The validated observable Omaha System nursing interventions for nursing home practice have potential for use in future studies of nursing home practice to understand evidence-based practice, and gaps in care provided. The methodology may be extended to define observable interventions for other roles and settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信