复发或转移性宫颈癌患者接受I期研究性治疗的肿瘤预后预测因素

Q3 Medicine
Ji Son, Heather Y Lin, Siqing Fu, Amadeo B Biter, Ecaterina E Dumbrava, Daniel D Karp, Aung Naing, Shubham Pant, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Jordi Rodon, Vivek Subbiah, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Timothy A Yap, Michael M Frumovitz, Amir A Jazaeri, Pedro T Ramirez, Shannon N Westin, Ying Yuan, Funda Meric-Bernstam, David S Hong
{"title":"复发或转移性宫颈癌患者接受I期研究性治疗的肿瘤预后预测因素","authors":"Ji Son,&nbsp;Heather Y Lin,&nbsp;Siqing Fu,&nbsp;Amadeo B Biter,&nbsp;Ecaterina E Dumbrava,&nbsp;Daniel D Karp,&nbsp;Aung Naing,&nbsp;Shubham Pant,&nbsp;Sarina A Piha-Paul,&nbsp;Jordi Rodon,&nbsp;Vivek Subbiah,&nbsp;Apostolia M Tsimberidou,&nbsp;Timothy A Yap,&nbsp;Michael M Frumovitz,&nbsp;Amir A Jazaeri,&nbsp;Pedro T Ramirez,&nbsp;Shannon N Westin,&nbsp;Ying Yuan,&nbsp;Funda Meric-Bernstam,&nbsp;David S Hong","doi":"10.36401/JIPO-22-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors that are predictive of response and survival in patients with cervical cancer referred to phase I clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with cervical cancer who received at least one dose of a phase I investigational agent at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and multivariable regression analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 65 patients with a median age of 41 years (range, 20-74), 3 prior therapies (range, 1-7), and 67.7% squamous carcinoma. The rate of distant metastasis at trial entry was 84.6%. The most common molecular alterations included PIK3CA (46.5%), PD-L1+ (46.2%), EPH (30.0%), and CREBBP (23.1%); 23.1% had received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Phase I trials were for immunotherapy (58.5%) or targeted therapy (41.5%). The rate of biomarker matching was 21.5%. For all patients, median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.2) and OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.0-10.6). Factors at study entry associated with worse survival were presence of bone metastasis (PFS 1.6 vs 4.4 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; <i>p</i> = 0.001; OS 3.8 vs 10.0 months: HR, 3.9; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and absolute lymphocyte count below 1000/μL (PFS 1.8 vs 5.2 months: HR, 2.9; <i>p</i> = 0.0004; OS 7.0 vs 10.6 months: HR, 3.2; <i>p</i> = 0.0009). Factors associated only with worse OS were absolute neutrophil count above 4700/μL, hemoglobin below 10.5 g/dL, and smoking status. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events were seen in 16.9% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bone metastasis and absolute lymphocyte count below normal range at phase I study entry portend poor survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":16081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology","volume":"6 1","pages":"10-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/4f/i2590-017X-6-1-10.PMC9888522.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ji Son,&nbsp;Heather Y Lin,&nbsp;Siqing Fu,&nbsp;Amadeo B Biter,&nbsp;Ecaterina E Dumbrava,&nbsp;Daniel D Karp,&nbsp;Aung Naing,&nbsp;Shubham Pant,&nbsp;Sarina A Piha-Paul,&nbsp;Jordi Rodon,&nbsp;Vivek Subbiah,&nbsp;Apostolia M Tsimberidou,&nbsp;Timothy A Yap,&nbsp;Michael M Frumovitz,&nbsp;Amir A Jazaeri,&nbsp;Pedro T Ramirez,&nbsp;Shannon N Westin,&nbsp;Ying Yuan,&nbsp;Funda Meric-Bernstam,&nbsp;David S Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.36401/JIPO-22-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors that are predictive of response and survival in patients with cervical cancer referred to phase I clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with cervical cancer who received at least one dose of a phase I investigational agent at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and multivariable regression analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 65 patients with a median age of 41 years (range, 20-74), 3 prior therapies (range, 1-7), and 67.7% squamous carcinoma. The rate of distant metastasis at trial entry was 84.6%. The most common molecular alterations included PIK3CA (46.5%), PD-L1+ (46.2%), EPH (30.0%), and CREBBP (23.1%); 23.1% had received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Phase I trials were for immunotherapy (58.5%) or targeted therapy (41.5%). The rate of biomarker matching was 21.5%. For all patients, median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.2) and OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.0-10.6). Factors at study entry associated with worse survival were presence of bone metastasis (PFS 1.6 vs 4.4 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; <i>p</i> = 0.001; OS 3.8 vs 10.0 months: HR, 3.9; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and absolute lymphocyte count below 1000/μL (PFS 1.8 vs 5.2 months: HR, 2.9; <i>p</i> = 0.0004; OS 7.0 vs 10.6 months: HR, 3.2; <i>p</i> = 0.0009). Factors associated only with worse OS were absolute neutrophil count above 4700/μL, hemoglobin below 10.5 g/dL, and smoking status. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events were seen in 16.9% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bone metastasis and absolute lymphocyte count below normal range at phase I study entry portend poor survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"10-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/4f/i2590-017X-6-1-10.PMC9888522.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36401/JIPO-22-23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JIPO-22-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:我们的目的是确定临床、病理和治疗因素,这些因素可以预测宫颈癌患者的I期临床试验的反应和生存。方法:纳入2014年至2022年期间在我院接受至少一剂I期研究药物治疗的宫颈癌患者。采用log-rank检验分析无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的差异,并进行多变量回归分析。结果:我们纳入65例患者,中位年龄41岁(范围20-74岁),既往治疗3例(范围1-7岁),67.7%为鳞状癌。试验开始时远处转移率为84.6%。最常见的分子改变包括PIK3CA(46.5%)、PD-L1+(46.2%)、EPH(30.0%)和CREBBP (23.1%);23.1%先前接受过检查点抑制剂。I期试验为免疫治疗(58.5%)或靶向治疗(41.5%)。生物标志物匹配率为21.5%。所有患者的中位PFS为3.6个月(95% CI, 2.0-5.2), OS为9.3个月(95% CI, 7.0-10.6)。研究开始时与较差生存率相关的因素是存在骨转移(PFS 1.6 vs 4.4个月:风险比[HR], 2.8;P = 0.001;OS 3.8 vs 10.0个月:HR 3.9;p < 0.0001),绝对淋巴细胞计数低于1000/μL (PFS 1.8 vs 5.2月:HR, 2.9;P = 0.0004;OS 7.0 vs 10.6个月:HR, 3.2;P = 0.0009)。与OS恶化相关的唯一因素是绝对中性粒细胞计数高于4700/μL、血红蛋白低于10.5 g/dL和吸烟状况。16.9%的病例出现3+级治疗相关不良事件。结论:在I期研究开始时,骨转移和绝对淋巴细胞计数低于正常范围预示着复发或转移性宫颈癌患者的生存率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer.

Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer.

Introduction: We aimed to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors that are predictive of response and survival in patients with cervical cancer referred to phase I clinical trials.

Methods: Patients with cervical cancer who received at least one dose of a phase I investigational agent at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and multivariable regression analysis was performed.

Results: We included 65 patients with a median age of 41 years (range, 20-74), 3 prior therapies (range, 1-7), and 67.7% squamous carcinoma. The rate of distant metastasis at trial entry was 84.6%. The most common molecular alterations included PIK3CA (46.5%), PD-L1+ (46.2%), EPH (30.0%), and CREBBP (23.1%); 23.1% had received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Phase I trials were for immunotherapy (58.5%) or targeted therapy (41.5%). The rate of biomarker matching was 21.5%. For all patients, median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.2) and OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.0-10.6). Factors at study entry associated with worse survival were presence of bone metastasis (PFS 1.6 vs 4.4 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; p = 0.001; OS 3.8 vs 10.0 months: HR, 3.9; p < 0.0001) and absolute lymphocyte count below 1000/μL (PFS 1.8 vs 5.2 months: HR, 2.9; p = 0.0004; OS 7.0 vs 10.6 months: HR, 3.2; p = 0.0009). Factors associated only with worse OS were absolute neutrophil count above 4700/μL, hemoglobin below 10.5 g/dL, and smoking status. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events were seen in 16.9% of cases.

Conclusion: Bone metastasis and absolute lymphocyte count below normal range at phase I study entry portend poor survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信